User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:hw:start

Table of Contents

Homeworks

HW 12

  1. Following Thursday's class, can you verify explicitly that any closed differential 2-form in R3\R^3 is exact?
  1. (optional) read about Brouer's fixed point theorem in Pugh, and try Pugh Exercise 71, hairy ball theorem.
2022/04/16 09:23 · pzhou

HW 11

This weeks material is mostly conceptual, although the statement and proof in Pugh are all based on concrete formula.

  • Consider the generalized angular forms Ωn1\Omega_{n-1} defined on Rn\0\R^n \RM 0
    • For n=2n=2, we define Ω1=x2(x1dx2x2dx1)\Omega_1 = |x|^{-2} (x_1 dx_2 - x_2 dx_1)
    • For n=3n=3, we define Ω2=x3(x1dx2dx3x2dx1dx3+x3dx1dx2)\Omega_2 = |x|^{-3} (x_1 dx_2 \wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 \wedge dx_3 + x_3 dx_1 \wedge dx_2)
    • Can you prove that dΩ1=0d \Omega_1=0, dΩ2=0d \Omega_2=0?
    • Can you write down the expression for the general nn? Or just prove the general case?
    • Consider the following 2-cell in R3\R^3 (it parametrized the unit sphere), γ:[0,1]2R3,(s,t)(sin(πs)cos(2πt),sin(πs)sin(2πt),cosπs)\gamma: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3, \quad (s,t) \mapsto (\sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \sin (\pi s) \sin (2\pi t), \cos \pi s) What is γΩ2\int_\gamma \Omega_2?
    • Suppose we use a different parametrization of S2S^2, the stereographic projection γ:R2R3,(a,b)(2a1+a2+b2,2b1+a2+b2,1+a2+b21+a2+b2) \gamma: \R^2 \mapsto \R^3, \quad (a,b) \mapsto (\frac{2a}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{2b}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{-1+a^2+b^2}{1+a^2+b^2}) Can you explain why γΩ2\int_{\gamma} \Omega_2 is the same as the previous one?
  • (Optional) Let γ1,γ2,[0,1]R3\gamma_1, \gamma_2, [0,1] \to \R^3 be two smooth loops, i.e. γi(0)=γi(1)\gamma_i(0)=\gamma_i(1) and γi(0)=γi(1)\gamma_i'(0) = \gamma_i'(1). Suppose they have disjoint images. Define a 2-cell ϕ:[0,1]2R3\phi: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3 by ϕ(s,t)=γ1(s)γ2(t)\phi(s,t) = \gamma_1(s) - \gamma_2(t). Prove that (4π)1ϕΩ2(4\pi)^{-1} \int_\phi \Omega_2 is an integer (hence insensitive to small perturbation of γ1,γ2\gamma_1, \gamma_2). This is called the linking number of two knots, and is a topological invariant of links. Can you compute some examples? Can you see its topological meaning?
    • Here is one example (maybe a bit degenerate): imagine two loops with very large radiu, one is lying on the xy plane, one is lying on the xz plane. Say, γ1\gamma_1 is given by z=0,(x+R1)2+y2=R2z=0, (x+R-1)^2 + y^2 = R^2; and γ2\gamma_2 is given by y=0,(xR+1)2+z2=R2y=0, (x-R+1)^2+z^2 = R^2. Can you compute the linking number? Can you picture what happens to the two circles if RR \to \infty?
    • That wasn't very easy to compute. Here is a simpler one: γ1\gamma_1 has the image of a loop z=0,x2+y2=r2z=0, x^2 + y^2 = r^2, with rr very small. And γ2\gamma_2 is the circle y=0,(xR)2+z2=R2y=0, (x-R)^2 + z^2 = R^2, with RR very large.
2022/04/08 14:12 · pzhou

HW 10

Rudin Ch 9,

  • 12 (a,b,c)
  • 13
  • 19

Pugh Ch 5. Ex 14, 24

2022/04/02 12:58 · pzhou

HW 9

  1. Rudin Ex 8.6
  2. Rudin Ex 8.7 (Rudin's Dif=f/xiD_i f = \partial f / \partial x_i)
  3. Show that, for any closed subset ER2E \In \R^2, there is a continuous function f:R2Rf: \R^2 \to \R, such that f1(0)=Ef^{-1}(0) = E. (bonus, can you make ff a smooth function?)
  4. For the implicit function theorem, take n=m=1n=m=1, and interpret it graphically and intuitively.
2022/03/17 22:16 · pzhou

HW 8

1. Read appendix F about Littlewood's three principles, and write some comments about it in your webpage (for example, a summary of what this is about, or questions)

2. Do Pugh Ex 83

3. Let (Rn,1)(\R^n, | \cdot |_{1}) be the normed vector space where (x1,,xn)1:=ixi|(x_1, \cdots, x_n)|_{1}: = \sum_i |x_i| . Let T:RnRnT: \R^n \to \R^n be a linear operator, given by the matrix TijT_{ij}, that sends (xi)(x_i) to (yj)(y_j), where yi=jTijxjy_i = \sum_j T_{ij} x_j. How to compute T\|T \|?

  • optional: if we use max\| - \|_{max} norm on Rn\R^n, how to compute the operator norm T\|T\|?

4. Read about Hölder inequality and Minkowski inequality. In the simplest setting, we have

  • (Hölder inequality), for p,q1p,q \geq 1 that 1/q+1/p=11/q+1/p=1, we have

(i=1nxiyi)(ixip)1/p(iyiq)1/q (\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i y_i|) \leq (\sum_i |x_i|^p)^{1/p} (\sum_i |y_i|^q)^{1/q}

  • (Minkowski inequality) for any p1p\geq 1, (i=1nxi+yip)1/p(ixip)1/p+(iyip)1/p(\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i + y_i|^p)^{1/p} \leq (\sum_i |x_i|^p)^{1/p} + (\sum_i |y_i|^p)^{1/p}

Read about the proof (in wiki, or any textbook about functional analysis, say Folland). Why it works?

2022/03/11 20:46 · pzhou
math105-s22/hw/start.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/20 11:49 by pzhou