User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:hw:hw2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math105-s22:hw:hw2 [2022/01/27 14:57]
pzhou
math105-s22:hw:hw2 [2022/02/03 23:00] (current)
pzhou [Lemma 3]
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 ==== Lemma 0 ==== ==== Lemma 0 ====
-(stolen from Tao's grad measure theory book)+(stolen from Tao's grad [[https://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/gsm-126-tao5-measure-book.pdf | measure theory book]])
  
 {{:math105-s22:hw:pasted:20220127-143526.png}} {{:math105-s22:hw:pasted:20220127-143526.png}}
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 Hint: This is a hard one. First prove that AA can be written as countable union of bounded closed subsets, then suffice to prove the claim that any bounded closed (hence compact) subset AA is measurable.  Hint: This is a hard one. First prove that AA can be written as countable union of bounded closed subsets, then suffice to prove the claim that any bounded closed (hence compact) subset AA is measurable. 
 +
 +Hint 2: Given AA a closed bounded subset of Rn\R^n, for any $\epsilon>0$, we have some open set UU with m(U)<m(A)+ϵm^*(U) < m^*(A) + \epsilon. Then we just need to show that m(U\A)<ϵm^*(U \RM A) < \epsilon. Note U\AU\RM A is open. Claim: for any closed subset KU\AK \in U \RM A, we have m(K)+m(A)=m(AK)m(U)m^*(K) + m^*(A) = m^*(A \cup K) \leq m^*(U), hence m(K)<ϵm^*(K) < \epsilon. The key point is to show that there exists an increasing sequence of closed subsets KnU\AK_n \In U \RM A, such that limm(Kn)=m(U\A)\lim m^*(K_n) = m^*(U \RM A). Try to construct KnK_n as finite union of almost disjoint closed boxes, e.g., use the dyadic subdivision trick. 
  
 What does a closed set look like? Say, the cantor set in $[0,1]$?  What does a closed set look like? Say, the cantor set in $[0,1]$? 
math105-s22/hw/hw2.1643324260.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/01/27 14:57 by pzhou