User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:hw:hw11

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
math105-s22:hw:hw11 [2022/04/13 17:27]
pzhou [HW 11]
math105-s22:hw:hw11 [2022/04/15 16:27] (current)
pzhou [HW 11]
Line 7: Line 7:
     * Can you prove that dΩ1=0d \Omega_1=0, dΩ2=0d \Omega_2=0     * Can you prove that dΩ1=0d \Omega_1=0, dΩ2=0d \Omega_2=0
     * Can you write down the expression for the general nn? Or just prove the general case?      * Can you write down the expression for the general nn? Or just prove the general case? 
-    * Consider the following 2-cell in R3\R^3 (it parametrized the unit sphere),  \gamma: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3, \quad (s,t) \mapsto (\sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \cos \pi s) What is γΩ2\int_\gamma \Omega_2+    * Consider the following 2-cell in R3\R^3 (it parametrized the unit sphere),  \gamma: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3, \quad (s,t) \mapsto (\sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \sin (\pi s) \sin (2\pi t), \cos \pi s) What is γΩ2\int_\gamma \Omega_2
     * Suppose we use a different parametrization of S2S^2,[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection |  the stereographic projection]] \gamma: \R^2 \mapsto \R^3, \quad (a,b) \mapsto (\frac{2a}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{2b}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{-1+a^2+b^2}{1+a^2+b^2}) Can you explain why γΩ2\int_{\gamma} \Omega_2 is the same as the previous one?      * Suppose we use a different parametrization of S2S^2,[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection |  the stereographic projection]] \gamma: \R^2 \mapsto \R^3, \quad (a,b) \mapsto (\frac{2a}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{2b}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{-1+a^2+b^2}{1+a^2+b^2}) Can you explain why γΩ2\int_{\gamma} \Omega_2 is the same as the previous one? 
   * (Optional) Let γ1,γ2,[0,1]R3\gamma_1, \gamma_2, [0,1] \to \R^3 be two smooth loops, i.e. γi(0)=γi(1)\gamma_i(0)=\gamma_i(1) and $\gamma_i'(0) = \gamma_i'(1).Supposetheyhavedisjointimages.Definea2cell. Suppose they have disjoint images. Define a 2-cell \phi: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3by by \phi(s,t) = \gamma_1(s) - \gamma_2(t).Provethat. Prove that (4\pi)^{-1} \int_\phi \Omega_2isaninteger(henceinsensitivetosmallperturbationof is an integer (hence insensitive to small perturbation of \gamma_1, \gamma_2$). This is called the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linking_number | linking number of two knots]], and is a topological invariant of links. Can you compute some examples? Can you see its topological meaning?    * (Optional) Let γ1,γ2,[0,1]R3\gamma_1, \gamma_2, [0,1] \to \R^3 be two smooth loops, i.e. γi(0)=γi(1)\gamma_i(0)=\gamma_i(1) and $\gamma_i'(0) = \gamma_i'(1).Supposetheyhavedisjointimages.Definea2cell. Suppose they have disjoint images. Define a 2-cell \phi: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3by by \phi(s,t) = \gamma_1(s) - \gamma_2(t).Provethat. Prove that (4\pi)^{-1} \int_\phi \Omega_2isaninteger(henceinsensitivetosmallperturbationof is an integer (hence insensitive to small perturbation of \gamma_1, \gamma_2$). This is called the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linking_number | linking number of two knots]], and is a topological invariant of links. Can you compute some examples? Can you see its topological meaning? 
math105-s22/hw/hw11.1649896069.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/04/13 17:27 by pzhou