User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:hw:hw11

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math105-s22:hw:hw11 [2022/04/08 14:16]
pzhou
math105-s22:hw:hw11 [2022/04/15 16:27] (current)
pzhou [HW 11]
Line 4: Line 4:
   * Consider the generalized angular forms Ωn1\Omega_{n-1} defined on Rn\0\R^n \RM 0   * Consider the generalized angular forms Ωn1\Omega_{n-1} defined on Rn\0\R^n \RM 0
     * For n=2n=2, we define Ω1=x2(x1dx2x2dx1)\Omega_1 = |x|^{-2} (x_1 dx_2 - x_2 dx_1)     * For n=2n=2, we define Ω1=x2(x1dx2x2dx1)\Omega_1 = |x|^{-2} (x_1 dx_2 - x_2 dx_1)
-    * For n=3n=3, we define $\Omega_2 = |x|^{-3} (x_1 dx_2 \wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 \wedge dx_3 + x_1 dx_2 \wedge dx_3)$+    * For n=3n=3, we define $\Omega_2 = |x|^{-3} (x_1 dx_2 \wedge dx_3 - x_2 dx_1 \wedge dx_3 + x_3 dx_1 \wedge dx_2)$
     * Can you prove that dΩ1=0d \Omega_1=0, dΩ2=0d \Omega_2=0     * Can you prove that dΩ1=0d \Omega_1=0, dΩ2=0d \Omega_2=0
     * Can you write down the expression for the general nn? Or just prove the general case?      * Can you write down the expression for the general nn? Or just prove the general case? 
-    * Consider the following 2-cell in R3\R^3 (it parametrized the unit sphere),  \gamma: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3, \quad (s,t) \mapsto (\sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \cos \pi s) What is γΩ2\int_\gamma \Omega_2+    * Consider the following 2-cell in R3\R^3 (it parametrized the unit sphere),  \gamma: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3, \quad (s,t) \mapsto (\sin (\pi s) \cos (2\pi t), \sin (\pi s) \sin (2\pi t), \cos \pi s) What is γΩ2\int_\gamma \Omega_2
     * Suppose we use a different parametrization of S2S^2,[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection |  the stereographic projection]] \gamma: \R^2 \mapsto \R^3, \quad (a,b) \mapsto (\frac{2a}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{2b}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{-1+a^2+b^2}{1+a^2+b^2}) Can you explain why γΩ2\int_{\gamma} \Omega_2 is the same as the previous one?      * Suppose we use a different parametrization of S2S^2,[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereographic_projection |  the stereographic projection]] \gamma: \R^2 \mapsto \R^3, \quad (a,b) \mapsto (\frac{2a}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{2b}{1+a^2+b^2}, \frac{-1+a^2+b^2}{1+a^2+b^2}) Can you explain why γΩ2\int_{\gamma} \Omega_2 is the same as the previous one? 
-  * Let γ1,γ2,[0,1]R3\gamma_1, \gamma_2, [0,1] \to \R^3 be two smooth loops, i.e. γi(0)=γi(1)\gamma_i(0)=\gamma_i(1) and $\gamma_i'(0) = \gamma_i'(1).Supposetheyhavedisjointimages.Definea2cell. Suppose they have disjoint images. Define a 2-cell \phi: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3by by \phi(s,t) = \gamma_1(s) - \gamma_2(t).Provethat. Prove that \int_\phi \Omega_2isinsensitivetosmallperturbationof is insensitive to small perturbation of \gamma_1, \gamma_2$. This is called the Gauss linking number, and is a topological invariant of links. Can you compute some examples? Can you see its topological meaning? [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linking_number | (wiki page)]]+  * (Optional) Let γ1,γ2,[0,1]R3\gamma_1, \gamma_2, [0,1] \to \R^3 be two smooth loops, i.e. γi(0)=γi(1)\gamma_i(0)=\gamma_i(1) and $\gamma_i'(0) = \gamma_i'(1).Supposetheyhavedisjointimages.Definea2cell. Suppose they have disjoint images. Define a 2-cell \phi: [0,1]^2 \to \R^3by by \phi(s,t) = \gamma_1(s) - \gamma_2(t).Provethat. Prove that (4\pi)^{-1} \int_\phi \Omega_2$ is an integer (hence insensitive to small perturbation of γ1,γ2\gamma_1, \gamma_2). This is called the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linking_number | linking number of two knots]], and is a topological invariant of links. Can you compute some examples? Can you see its topological meaning?  
 +    * Here is one example (maybe a bit degenerate)<del>imagine two loops with very large radiu, one is lying on the xy plane, one is lying on the xz planeSay, γ1\gamma_1 is given by z=0,(x+R1)2+y2=R2z=0, (x+R-1)^2 + y^2 = R^2; and γ2\gamma_2 is given by y=0,(xR+1)2+z2=R2y=0, (x-R+1)^2+z^2 = R^2 Can you compute the linking number? Can you picture what happens to the two circles if RR \to \infty?</del> 
 +    * That wasn't very easy to compute. Here is a simpler one: γ1\gamma_1 has the image of a loop z=0,x2+y2=r2z=0, x^2 + y^2 = r^2, with rr very small. And γ2\gamma_2 is the circle $y=0, (x-R)^2 + z^2 = R^2,with, with R$ very large. 
  
  
math105-s22/hw/hw11.1649452563.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/04/08 14:16 by pzhou