User Tools

Site Tools


math104-s22:notes:lecture_5

Lecture 5

  • Cauchy sequence: “we don't know where we are heading, but we agree with each other more and more”.
  • Cauchy sequence is equivalent to convergent sequences…. in R\R.
  • Limit sets and subsequences.

Cauchy Sequences

First, the definition. Let (an)(a_n) be a sequence in R\R, we say (an)(a_n) is Cauchy, if for any ϵ>0\epsilon> 0 , we have N>0N>0, such that for all n,m>Nn,m>N, we have anam<ϵ|a_n - a_m | < \epsilon.

Lemma : Convergent sequence is Cauchy.
Pf: suppose anaa_n \to a. We need to show that for any ϵ>0\epsilon> 0 , we have N>0N>0, such that for all n,m>Nn,m>N, we have anam<ϵ|a_n - a_m | < \epsilon. Let ϵ1=ϵ/2\epsilon_1 = \epsilon /2 , then by convergence of ana_n, we have N1>0N_1>0, such that ana<ϵ1|a_n - a| < \epsilon_1 for all n>N1n > N_1. Thus for any n,m>N1n,m > N_1, we have anamana+amaϵ1+ϵ1=ϵ |a_n - a_m| \leq |a_n -a | + |a_m - a| \leq \epsilon_1 + \epsilon_1 = \epsilon Thus, let N=N1N=N_1 would work.

Lemma : If AnanBnA_n \geq a_n \geq B_n, and limAn=limBn=a\lim A_n = \lim B_n = a, then liman=a\lim a_n = a.
Pf: for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, we have N>0N>0 such that, for all n>Nn > N, Ana<ϵ,Bna<ϵ|A_n - a| < \epsilon, |B_n - a| < \epsilon, then anAna+ϵ,anBnaϵ a_n \leq A_n \leq a+\epsilon, \quad a_n \geq B_n \geq a-\epsilon Thus ,anaϵ|a_n - a| \leq \epsilon for all n>N n > N, hence anaa_n \to a.

Lemma : Let (an)(a_n) be a bounded sequence. (an)(a_n) is convergent if and only if lim supan=lim infan\limsup a_n = \liminf a_n.
Pf: Assume lim supan=lim infan=a\limsup a_n = \liminf a_n = a. Let An=supmnam,Bn=infmnamA_n = \sup_{m \geq n} a_m, B_n = \inf_{m \geq n} a_m, then AnanBnA_n \geq a_n \geq B_n. By preview lemma, we know anaa_n \to a.

Assume (an)(a_n) is convergent to aa. Then, for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there is an N>0N>0, that for all n>Nn > N, ana<ϵ|a_n - a|<\epsilon. In particular, we know lim supana+ϵ\limsup a_n \leq a+\epsilon. Since this is true for all ϵ>0\epsilon>0, we have lim supana\limsup a_n \leq a. Similarly, lim infana\liminf a_n \geq a. On the other hand, since AnBnA_n \geq B_n, we have lim supan=limAnlimBn=lim infan\limsup a_n = \lim A_n \geq \lim B_n = \liminf a_n. Hence, lim supan=lim infan=a\limsup a_n = \liminf a_n = a.

Lemma: Cauchy sequence is bounded. (Exercise)

Lemma: If lim supan=A\limsup a_n = A, then for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, and any N>0N > 0, there exists n>Nn>N with anA<ϵ|a_n - A| < \epsilon. Similarly, if lim supan=B\limsup a_n = B, then for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, and any N>0N > 0, there exists n>Nn>N with anB<ϵ|a_n - B| < \epsilon.
Pf: Since An=supm>namA_n = \sup_{m>n} a_m is a monotone decreasing sequence with limit AA, then for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and N>0N>0, we can find M>NM > N such that A+ϵ/2>AMAA+\epsilon/2 > A_{M} \geq A. By definition of AMA_{M}, there exists some ana_n with nMn \geq M, that AMan>AMϵ/2A_{M} \geq a_n > A_{M} - \epsilon/2. Now, we have anAanAM+AMAϵ/2+ϵ/2=ϵ |a_n - A| \leq |a_n - A_M| + |A_M - A| \leq \epsilon/2 + \epsilon/2 = \epsilon The result is proven.

Theorem : Cauchy sequence in R\R is convergent.
Proof: Let (an)(a_n) be a Cauchy sequence. By previous lemma, it is bounded. Let A=lim supanA = \limsup a_n and B=lim infanB = \liminf a_n, we only need to show that A=BA = B to show liman\lim a_n exists. We know ABA \geq B for all bounded sequence ana_n, suppose A>BA > B, and let ϵ=(AB)/3\epsilon = (A-B)/3. Then, by Cauchyness of (an)(a_n), we there is an N>0N>0, such that for all n,m>Nn,m> N, we have anam<ϵ|a_n - a_m| < \epsilon. By previous lemma, there exists n>Nn>N, with anA<ϵ|a_n - A|<\epsilon, and m>Nm>N with amB<ϵ|a_m - B| < \epsilon. Hence ABAan+anam+amB<3ϵ=AB, |A - B| \leq |A-a_n|+|a_n - a_m| + |a_m - B| < 3 \epsilon = |A-B|, notice the inequality is strict, hence we have a contradiction. Thus A=BA = B.

Subsequence and Subsequntial Limit

If n1<n2<n_1 < n_2 < \cdots is a strictly increasing sequence in N\N, and (an)(a_n) is a sequence, then (ank)(a_{n_k}) is a subsequence of (an)(a_n).

In this section, we can ask, even if (an)(a_n) itself does not converge to some aRa \in \R, can we cherry-picking some nice subsequence in (an)(a_n) that does converge.

Example:

  • an=(1)n+1/na_n = (-1)^n + 1/n has a convergent subsequences, that converges to +1+1; and another subseq convergent to 1-1.

Definition: Let (an)(a_n) be a sequence in R\R, if aRa \in \R is the limit of a sequence of (an)(a_n), we say aa is a subsequential limit.

Lemma : aa is a subsequential limit of (an)(a_n) \Leftrightarrow for any ϵ>0,N>0\epsilon>0, N>0, there exists an n>Nn>N, with ana<ϵ|a_n - a| < \epsilon. Equivalently, for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, the set Aϵ={nana<ϵ}A_\epsilon = \{n \mid |a_n - a| < \epsilon \} is infinite.

Pf: \Rightarrow : let anka_{n_k} be a subseq that converges to nn, then we can find among member within this subsequence.

$ \Lefgarrow$: it's a good opportunity to introduce the Cantor's diagonal trick. For any positive integer kk, we know A1/kA_{1/k} is infinite, we write it in the kk-th row, as A1/k=nk,1<nk,2< A_{1/k} = n_{k,1} < n_{k,2}< \cdots As k=1,2,k=1,2,\cdots, we have an semi-infinite matrix of indices. We may check that nk,ink+1,in_{k, i } \leq n_{k+1, i}. Thus nk,knk+1,k<nk+1,k+1n_{k,k} \leq n_{k+1, k} < n_{k+1, k+1}, hence along the diagonal, we have strictly increasing sequence. Consider the subsequence ankka_{n_{kk}}, that will converge to aa.

math104-s22/notes/lecture_5.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/31 21:37 by pzhou