This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
math104-s21:s:martinzhai [2021/09/01 12:20] 110.249.201.35 ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation |
math104-s21:s:martinzhai [2022/01/11 18:31] (current) 24.253.46.239 ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
* __Pointwise Convergence of Sequence of Functions__: | * __Pointwise Convergence of Sequence of Functions__: | ||
* Examples:Running and Shrinking Bumps. | * Examples:Running and Shrinking Bumps. | ||
- | {{ math104-2021sp: | + | {{ math104-s21: |
=== Lecture 18 (Mar 18) - Covered Rudin Chapter 7 === | === Lecture 18 (Mar 18) - Covered Rudin Chapter 7 === | ||
Line 466: | Line 466: | ||
* Example: , then a partition would be . | * Example: , then a partition would be . | ||
* __U(P,f) and L(P,f)__: Given bounded, and partion , we define where $M_i= \sup \{f(x), x\isin [x_{i-1}, | * __U(P,f) and L(P,f)__: Given bounded, and partion , we define where $M_i= \sup \{f(x), x\isin [x_{i-1}, | ||
- | {{ math104-2021sp: | + | {{ math104-s21: |
* __U(f) and L(f)__: Define and . | * __U(f) and L(f)__: Define and . | ||
* Since is bounded, hence such that for all , then partition of , , and , and . | * Since is bounded, hence such that for all , then partition of , , and , and . | ||
Line 539: | Line 539: | ||
==== Questions ==== | ==== Questions ==== | ||
- | - {{math104-2021sp: | + | - {{math104-s21: |
- In general, how to prove a set is infinite(in order to use theorem 11.2 in Ross)? | - In general, how to prove a set is infinite(in order to use theorem 11.2 in Ross)? | ||
- Is there a way/analogy to understand/ | - Is there a way/analogy to understand/ | ||
- Is there a way to actually test if a set is compact or not instead of merely finding finite subcovers for all open covers? | - Is there a way to actually test if a set is compact or not instead of merely finding finite subcovers for all open covers? | ||
- Rudin 4.6 states that if , a limit point, and is continuous at if and only if . Does this theorem hold for but not a limit point of ? | - Rudin 4.6 states that if , a limit point, and is continuous at if and only if . Does this theorem hold for but not a limit point of ? | ||
- | - {{math104-2021sp: | + | - {{math104-s21: |
- Could we regard the global maximum as the maximum of all local minimums? | - Could we regard the global maximum as the maximum of all local minimums? | ||
- Under what circumstance would Taylor Theorem be essential to our proof, since for the question appeared in HW11 Q2, I really do not think using Taylor Theorem is a better way to prove the claim? | - Under what circumstance would Taylor Theorem be essential to our proof, since for the question appeared in HW11 Q2, I really do not think using Taylor Theorem is a better way to prove the claim? | ||
Line 558: | Line 558: | ||
- Is there any covering for a compact set that satisfies total length of the finite subcovers for the set is less than ? (Answer is no) | - Is there any covering for a compact set that satisfies total length of the finite subcovers for the set is less than ? (Answer is no) | ||
- Question 16 on Prof Fan's practice exam. | - Question 16 on Prof Fan's practice exam. | ||
- | - This is my solutions towards the practice exam: {{ math104-2021sp: | + | - This is my solutions towards the practice exam: {{ math104-s21: |