Midterm 1: Review
In the first part of this course, we covered the construction of real number, and some results about limit. Here is a list of key concepts
The numbers
N,Z,Q.
The axioms of field, an example of finite field $\F_5$.
The order relation, and ordered set. upper bound, lower bound. The least upper bound property.
R as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences in
Q. Prove many familiar operations and properties of
R.
R has least upper bound property. (hence
sup and
inf of bounded subset in
R exists in
R)
Sequences in
R, notion of convergence
Monotone bounded sequences are convergent (for increasing sequence, the
liman=sup{an:n∈N}; for decreasing one,
liman=inf{an:n∈N}.
lim-sup and lim-inf. The “epsilon of room” philosophy.
Thm: Cauchy sequences are convergent.
Limit Points, 3 equivalent definitions
Sample Problems
Midterm will have 3 of such following questions. It turns out 3 problems of the following kinds maybe either too easy or too hard. The number of problems may vary, but the difficulties will include some easy ones and some hard ones.
True or False? If true, prove your result; if false, give a counter example.
Let
(an) be a Cauchy sequence of irrational numbers, then its limit has to be an irrational number.
Let
S be an ordered set, then any non-empty finite subset
E⊂S has a least upper bound.
If
x is a limit point of sequence
(an), then there exists one
n∈N, such that
an=x.
If
(an) is a sequence bounded above, and
L=limsup(an), then for any
ϵ>0, there exists an integer
N>0, such that
an<L+ϵ.
Let
(an) be a bounded sequence in
R. Let
An=sup{am:0≤m≤n}, then
limAn=limsupan
Let
(an) and
(bn) be convergent sequences with the same limit
x. And choose any function
f:N→{0,1}. We define a new sequence, by mixing
an and
bn cn={anbnif f(n)=0 if f(n)=1 Then,
cn converges to
x.
If
(an) and
(bn) are Cauchy sequence in
R, and they satisfy that
lim(anbn)=1, then
liman=0.
If
(an) is a sequence of positive real numbers, for
n≥1, and
An=(a1+⋯+an)/n, show that if
an is convergent then
An is convergent. Give an example where
An is convergent, but
an is not convergent.
Is there a sequence
(an), where
∣an−an−1∣ is monotone decreasing, but
(an) is not convergent?
Solution
1
Let (an) be a Cauchy sequence of irrational numbers, then its limit has to be an irrational number.
False. Say an=π/n.
2
Let S be an ordered set, then any non-empty finite subset E⊂S has a least upper bound.
True. One can prove this by induction on the size of E.
3
If x is a limit point of sequence (an), then there exists one n∈N, such that an=x.
False. 0=limn1/n.
4
If (an) is a sequence bounded above, and L=limsup(an), then for any ϵ>0, there exists an integer N>0, such that an<L+ϵ.
True. explained in class.
5
Let (an) be a bounded sequence in R. Let An=sup{am:0≤m≤n}, then limAn=limsupan.
False. That's not the definition of limsup. Say an=1/(n+1), for n∈N, then limAn=1, and limsupan=0.
6
Let (an) and (bn) be convergent sequences with the same limit x. And choose any function f:N→{0,1}. We define a new sequence, by mixing an and bn cn={anbnif f(n)=0 if f(n)=1 Then, cn converges to x.
True. By convergence of an and bn, for any ϵ>0, exists N1>0 and N2, such that if n>N1, then ∣an−x∣<ϵ, and if n>N2, then ∣bn−x∣<ϵ. Since cn is either an or bn, hence for n>N=max(N1,N2), we have ∣cn−x∣<ϵ.
7
If (an) and (bn) are Cauchy sequence in R, and they satisfy that lim(anbn)=1, then liman=0.
True. Since if an,bn are convergent, then 1=lim(anbn)=(liman)(limbn), hence liman=0.
8
If (an) is a sequence of positive real numbers, for n≥1, and An=(a1+⋯+an)/n, show that if an is convergent then An is convergent. Give an example where An is convergent, but an is not convergent.
Proof: Let x be the limit of an. Given any ϵ>0, we claim there exists an N>0, such that ∣An−x∣<ϵ for all n>N. Let ϵ1=ϵ/3, and let N1>0 be such that for all n≥N1, we have ∣an−x∣<ϵ1. Since an is convergent, we also have an M>0, such that ∣an∣<M for all n. Then, for any n>N1, we have
An−x=(1/n)m=1∑N1am+(1/n)m=N1+1∑n(am−x)+(N1/n)x
Thus, we have
∣An−x∣≤(1/n)N1M+(1−N1/n)ϵ1+(N1/n)x
we may choose N large enough, such that N1/Nx<ϵ/3, N1/NM<ϵ/3, thus, for any n>N, we have
∣An−x∣≤ϵ/3+ϵ/3+ϵ/3=ϵ.
This finishes the proof of the first claim.
Here is an example where An is convergent, but an is not convergent: an=(−1)n.
9
Is there a sequence (an), where ∣an−an−1∣ is monotone decreasing, but (an) is not convergent?
Yes, for n≥1, an=∑m=1n1/n.