User Tools

Site Tools


math104-f21:hw4

HW 4

1. If xRx \in \R and there is a Cauchy sequence (an)(a_n) in Q\Q such that x=LIManx = LIM a_n, then show that x=limanx = \lim a_n.

2. For any aRa \in \R, prove that liman/n!=0\lim a^n / n! = 0.

3. Let A={qQ:q2<3}A = \{ q \in \Q: q^2 < 3 \}, let x=sup(A)x = \sup(A), prove that x2=3x^2 = 3.

4. Let s1=1s_1 = 1, and sn+1=1+sns_{n+1} = \sqrt{1 + s_n}. Assume that sns_n converges to cc, show that c=(5+1)/2 c=(\sqrt{5}+1)/2.

5. Let (an)(a_n) be a bounded sequence in R\R, and A=limsup(an)A = \lim sup(a_n), show that for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, the set {nNAϵanA+ϵ}\{ n \in \N \mid A - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq A+\epsilon \} is infinite.

Solution

1. Suffice to show that, for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there is an NN, such that for all n>Nn>N, we have anxϵ, |a_n - x| \leq \epsilon, which is xϵanx+ϵ. x - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq x + \epsilon. By Cauchy condition for ana_n, take ϵ1=ϵ\epsilon_1 = \epsilon, there exists N1>0N_1 > 0, such that for all n,m>N1n,m> N_1, we have anam<ϵ1|a_n - a_m| < \epsilon_1, in particular, we have amϵanam+ϵ. a_m - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq a_m + \epsilon. Consider the sequence (am)m=N1(a_m)_{m = N_1}^\infty, then we have its formal limit satisfies, for all n>N1n > N_1, xϵ=(LIMam)ϵan(LIMam)+ϵ=x+ϵ. x - \epsilon = (LIM a_m) - \epsilon \leq a_n \leq (LIM a_m) + \epsilon = x + \epsilon. Finally, take N=N1N = N_1.

2. Take any N>2aN > 2|a|, then for any n>Nn > N, we have an/an1=a/n<1/2 |a_{n} / a_{n-1}| = |a| / n < 1/2 Hence anaN(1/2)nN|a_{n}| \leq |a_{N}| (1/2)^{n-N}, take limit nn \to \infty shows the result.

3. Since AA is bounded above, we know the x=sup(A)x=sup(A) exists. Suppose x2<3x^2 < 3, then by the same argument as in Prop 5.5.12, we have a small enough ϵ>0\epsilon>0, such that (x+ϵ)2<3(x+\epsilon)^2 < 3, then let qq be a rational number, such that x<q<x+ϵx < q < x+\epsilon, we have q2<3q^2 < 3, hence qAq \in A. This contradicts with with xx being the supsup of AA. Suppose x2>3x^2 > 3, then we can find small enough ϵ>0\epsilon>0, such that (xϵ)2>3(x-\epsilon)^2 > 3, in particular xϵx-\epsilon is also an upperbound of AA, hence contradict with xx being the upper bound, hence x2=3x^2 = 3.

4. Since sn+12=1+sns_{n+1}^2 = 1 + s_n, and (sn)(s_n) converges, hence limsn+12=lim(1+sn) \lim s_{n+1}^2 = \lim(1 + s_n) which gives c2=1+c c^2 = 1 + c solving this gives $c = (\pm \sqrt{5}+1)/2 . Since sns_n are all positive by induction and, we see c=(5+1)/2c = ( \sqrt{5}+1)/2

5. This is covered in last Friday's lecture, where we proved that L=lim sup(an)L=\limsup(a_n) is a limit point of ana_n. Here we give the proof again.

We prove by contradiction, suppose there is an ϵ>0\epsilon>0, such that there are only finitely many terms in (an)(a_n) contained in [Lϵ,L+ϵ][L-\epsilon, L+\epsilon]. Then there exists an N1N_1, such that for all n>N1n>N_1, anL>ϵ|a_n - L| > \epsilon. By property of lim sup\limsup, we know there also exists N2N_2, such that for all n>N2n > N_2, an<L+ϵa_n < L + \epsilon. Then, for n>N=max(N1,N2)n > N= \max(N_1, N_2), we have anL>ϵ,an<L+ϵan<Lϵ. |a_n - L| > \epsilon, \quad a_n < L + \epsilon \Rightarrow a_n < L - \epsilon. Taking lim sup\limsup on the left, we get L \leq L - \epsilon$, which is a contradiction.

math104-f21/hw4.txt · Last modified: 2022/01/11 08:36 by pzhou