HW 2 (with Solution)
Due Thursday Sep 9th, 6pm.
In the following, a sequence (an) means (an)n=0∞, unless otherwise specified. You can only use properties of real number proved in Tao's book, section 5.4.
1. Let (an) be a sequence in Q. Suppose there is a rational 0<r<1, such that ∣an+1−an∣<r∣an−an−1∣, prove that (an) is a Cauchy sequence.
2. Let a0 be any positive integer, and an+1=3+an1. Prove that the (an) is a Cauchy sequence. (Hint: use the previous problem)
3. Let (an) be a Cauchy sequence in Q, and let the sequence (bn) be defined such that bn=a2n. Prove that (bn) is equivalent to (an).
4. If (an) and (bn) are Cauchy sequences, prove that (anbn) is also a Cauchy sequence.
5. If (an), (cn) and (bn) are Cauchy sequences, and (an)∼(cn), prove that (anbn)∼(cnbn).
(Problem 4 and 5 together proves Tao proposition 5.3.10, multiplication of real are well-defined).
Solution
1.
We first note that, for n≥0, by repeated using the given inequality, we have
∣an+1−an∣<rn∣a1−a0∣
We also note that ∣a1−a0∣>(1/r)∣a2−a1∣=0 by assumption.
Then, for any n<m, we have
∣am−an∣≤∣am−am−1∣+∣am−1−am−2∣+⋯+∣an+1−an∣≤∣a1−a0∣(rn+⋯rm−1)≤∣a1−a0∣1−rrn.
For any ϵ>0, we may take integer N large enough, such that
∣a1−a0∣1−rrN<ϵ
Thus, for all n,m>N, we have
∣am−an∣≤∣a1−a0∣1−rrn≤∣a1−a0∣1−rrN≤ϵ.
2.
For integer n≥1, we have
an+1−an=(3+an1)−(3+an−11)=anan−1an−1−an
Note that, for any a0>0, we have a1>3 and all subsequence an>3, hence for n≥2, we have
∣an+1−an∣≤9∣an−1−an∣.
Throw away the first term, we have (an)n=1∞ satisfies the condition of problem 1, with r=1/9, hence it is a Cauchy sequence.
3.
We need to show that, given any ϵ>0, there is an N>0, such that for all n>N, ∣an−bn∣≤ϵ. Since (an) is Cauchy, for the given ϵ>0, there exists an N0>0, such that for any n,m>N0, ∣an−am∣≤ϵ. In particular, if we take m=2n and set N=N0, then we get the desired result.
4.
Since Cauchy sequences are bounded, there exists M>0, such that ∣an∣<M and ∣bn∣<M for all n. Suppose ϵ>0 is given, we need to show that there exists N>0, such that for all n,m>N, ∣anbn−ambm∣≤ϵ. We let ϵ1=ϵ2=ϵ/(2M), then since (an) is Cauchy, there is a N1>0, such that for all n,m>N1, ∣an−am∣<ϵ1. Similarly, using (bn) is Cauchy, we get N2. Let N=max(N1,N2). Then for any n,m>N, we have
∣anbn−ambm∣=∣anbn−anbm+anbm−ambm∣≤∣an∣∣bn−bm∣+∣an−am∣∣bm∣≤M∣bn−bm∣+M∣an−am∣≤Mϵ1+Mϵ2=ϵ.
5.
We need to prove that, for any ϵ>0, exists N>0, such that for all n>N, we have
∣anbn−cnbn∣≤ϵ.
Since Cauchy sequences are bounded, there exists M>0, such that ∣bn∣<M for all n. Let ϵ′=ϵ/M, then since (an)∼(cn), there exists N>0, such that for all n>N, we have ∣an−cn∣<ϵ′, hence
∣anbn−cnbn∣≤∣an−cn∣∣bn∣≤∣an−cn∣M≤ϵ′M=ϵ.