.....
Dear Professor Schwartz:
Your letter to President Dynes of December 8, 2004 was forwarded to me
for response. That letter, like your earlier letter to me, asked about
the methodology for computing the cost of education. Our calculation of
the average cost of education is based upon a methodology developed
many years ago in conjunction with the California Post-Secondary
Education Commission (CPEC).
The denominator is the total number of General Campus FTE students. The
numerator includes direct expenditures for Instruction and the General
Campus share of Instruction-related expenditures, such as Student
Services, Libraries, Organized Activities, Institutional Support, and
Operation & Maintenance of the Physical Plant. Public Service,
Research and Financial Aid expenditures are excluded, along with the
Public Service and Research-related indirect costs of Libraries,
Organized Activities, Institutional Support, and Operation &
Maintenance of the Physical Plant.
As we indicated on page 81 of the Regents’ Budget, the cost to educate
a General Campus student using this methodology is $15,810. The student
share net of financial aid is $4,750. Hence, our statement that General
Campus students now pay 30% of the cost of education.
The University does not attempt to calculate the costs for various
student majors or to differentiate the costs of educating undergraduate
and graduate students. Because faculty teach at all levels and students
from various majors take the same course any attempt to make such a
calculation would require many assumptions. Estimates would vary widely
depending upon which assumptions were used.
In short, I have been through the complexities of commingled effort and
joint products many times with various agencies and individuals in
Sacramento. Based upon that experience I have concluded that any
attempt to disaggregate the cost of education will be based upon
questionable assumptions and that any resultant numbers will be of
little value.
While there is less variability in estimates that combine programs and
levels of student, it is clear that even the aggregated calculation
depends upon the assumptions used. I note, for example, a recent report
from the Legislative Analyst’s Office (Cal Facts: California’s
Economy and Budget in Perspective page 50) states that UC students
pay one-fourth of the cost of education, which they estimate to be
approximately $30,000. Elsewhere in that same document (page 33) they
report two other estimates ($13,429 and $26,564).
cc: President Dynes