User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:notes:lecture_6

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math105-s22:notes:lecture_6 [2022/02/02 23:42]
pzhou
math105-s22:notes:lecture_6 [2022/02/03 16:28] (current)
pzhou [Lecture 6]
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lecture 6 ====== ====== Lecture 6 ======
 +[[https://berkeley.zoom.us/rec/share/E9YcGb4kx_xuNLrBAVWTWhkZt0Y70DbhrtUMeBjTk6gZYhA8393qWN6W5UO9Yl0_.bMFQSrS0aqiGTY6X| video]]
 ===== Theorem 21 ===== ===== Theorem 21 =====
 If ERn,FRkE \In \R^n, F \In \R^k are measurable, then E×FE \times F is measurable, with m(E)×m(F)=m(E×F)m(E) \times m(F) = m(E \times F) If ERn,FRkE \In \R^n, F \In \R^k are measurable, then E×FE \times F is measurable, with m(E)×m(F)=m(E×F)m(E) \times m(F) = m(E \times F)
  
-Let's first treat some special case. If m(E)=0m(E)=0, and m(F)=m(F) = \infty, what is m(E×F)m(E \times F)? You have seen a special case as m({0}×R)=0m(\{0\} \times \R)=0 in R2\R^2. The general proof is similar, for each ϵ\epsilon, and each nNn \in \N, we can find a countable collection of boxes that covers E×B(0,n)E \times B(0, n) with total volume less than $\epsilon/2^n.Then,welet. Then, we let n=1,2,\cdots$, and put together these collection of boxes into a bigger collection (still countable), that gives a cover of E×RkE \times \R^k with total area less than ϵ\epsilon+Let's first treat some special case. If m(E)=0m(E)=0, and m(F)=m(F) = \infty, what is m(E×F)m(E \times F)? You have seen a special case as m({0}×R)=0m ( \{ 0 \} \times \R)=0 in R2\R^2. The general proof is similar, for each ϵ\epsilon, and each nNn \in \N, we can find a countable collection of boxes that covers E×B(0,n)E \times B(0, n) with total volume less than $\epsilon/2^n.Then,welet. Then, we let n=1,2,\cdots$, and put together these collection of boxes into a bigger collection (still countable), that gives a cover of E×RkE \times \R^k with total area less than ϵ\epsilon
  
 Next, let's prove some nice cases, that m(E×F)=m(E)m(F)m(E \times F) = m(E) m(F) Next, let's prove some nice cases, that m(E×F)=m(E)m(F)m(E \times F) = m(E) m(F)
Line 33: Line 33:
 By inner regularity, we may replace EE by a closed set KK. Since E is bounded, hence KK is compact. Now, we try to cover KK by open boxes of total area less than ϵ\epsilon. Let K1=π(K)K_1= \pi (K) the projection to the first factor, than K1K_1 is compact.  By inner regularity, we may replace EE by a closed set KK. Since E is bounded, hence KK is compact. Now, we try to cover KK by open boxes of total area less than ϵ\epsilon. Let K1=π(K)K_1= \pi (K) the projection to the first factor, than K1K_1 is compact. 
   * For each xIx \in I, we cover KxK_x by an open set V(x)V(x) of $m(V(x))<\epsilon.Wecanfind. We can find U(x) \supset x,that, that U(x) \times V(x) \supset \pi_1^{-1}(U(x)) .Thisispossiblesince. This is possible since K$ is compact.   * For each xIx \in I, we cover KxK_x by an open set V(x)V(x) of $m(V(x))<\epsilon.Wecanfind. We can find U(x) \supset x,that, that U(x) \times V(x) \supset \pi_1^{-1}(U(x)) .Thisispossiblesince. This is possible since K$ is compact.
-  * We know KxU(x)×V(x)K \subset \cup_x U(x) \times V(x), but that's uncountably many set. We can pass to a finite subcover, indexed by x1,,xNx_1, \cdots, x_N. Let $U_i = U(x_i) \RM (\cup_{j<i} U(x_j)),, V_i = V(x_i),thenwestillhave, then we still have U_i \times V_i \supset \pi^{-1} U_i.Thus,. Thus, U_iaredisjoint,andwehave are disjoint, and we have m(\cup U_i) \leq 1and and m(K) \leq \sum_i m(U_i)\times m(V_i) \leq \epsilon$. +  * We know KxU(x)×V(x)K \subset \cup_x U(x) \times V(x), but that's uncountably many set. We can pass to a finite subcover, indexed by x1,,xNx_1, \cdots, x_N. Let $U_i = U(x_i) \RM (\cup_{j<i} U(x_j)),, V_i = V(x_i),thenwestillhave, then we still have U_i \times V_i \supset \pi^{-1} U_i.Thus,. Thus, U_iaredisjoint,andwehave are disjoint, and we have m (\cup U_i) \leq 1and and m (K) \leq \sum_i m(U_i)\times m(V_i) \leq \epsilon$. 
  
 +===== Discussion =====
 +  - Can you prove that {y=x}R2\{y=x\} \In \R^2 has measure 00
 +  - In both of the two proofs above, we assumed EE was bounded, how to deal with the general case? 
 +  - Prove that every closed subset (e.g. your favorite Cantor set is a closed set) in R\R is a GδG_\delta-set. Is it true that every open set is a FσF_\sigma-set? 
  
  
  
    
math105-s22/notes/lecture_6.1643874167.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/02 23:42 by pzhou