This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
math105-s22:notes:lecture_6 [2022/02/01 00:30] pzhou created |
math105-s22:notes:lecture_6 [2022/02/03 16:28] (current) pzhou [Lecture 6] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Lecture 6 ====== | ====== Lecture 6 ====== | ||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | ===== Theorem 21 ===== | ||
+ | If are measurable, then is measurable, with . | ||
- | Theorem 21: If $E \In \R^n, F \In \R^k$ are measurable, then is measurable, with $m(E) \times | + | Let's first treat some special case. If $m(E)=0$, and $m(F) = \infty$, what is $m(E \times F)$? You have seen a special case as $m ( \{ 0 \} \times \R)=0\R^2\epsilonn \in \NE \times |
+ | Next, let's prove some nice cases, that . | ||
+ | * are open boxes. | ||
+ | * are open sets (each open set is a **disjoint** union of open boxes and a measure zero set. See Pugh's dyadic proof). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now, how to prove that is measurable? We could use Caratheodory criterion, or, we could use Lebesgue criterion, by constructing outer and inner approximations. Again, we may assume is bounded and is bounded (otherwise, they can be written as disjoint union of bounded measurable pieces, and we can deal with them pieces by pieces, and do countable union in the end). We may assume , for some open boxes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let be a -set and be , such that , and . Define for similarly. Then, by downward monotone continuity of measure, we have | ||
+ | |||
+ | where are open sets, with , and for all . | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, we have | ||
+ | |||
+ | where the last term is a null set, hence . | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Theorem 26 ===== | ||
+ | If is measurable, then is a zero set if and only if almost( = up to a zero set) every slice , () is measure zero. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pf: as usual, we may assume and is contained in the unit square. Suppose is measurable, and for almost all , then we want to show . Let be the set of where . Then, . Since is measureable and has measure 0, we may replace by , and assume for all , . | ||
+ | |||
+ | By inner regularity, we may replace by a closed set . Since E is bounded, hence is compact. Now, we try to cover by open boxes of total area less than . Let the projection to the first factor, than is compact. | ||
+ | * For each , we cover by an open set of $m(V(x))< | ||
+ | * We know , but that's uncountably many set. We can pass to a finite subcover, indexed by . Let $U_i = U(x_i) \RM (\cup_{j< | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
+ | - Can you prove that has measure ? | ||
+ | - In both of the two proofs above, we assumed was bounded, how to deal with the general case? | ||
+ | - Prove that every closed subset (e.g. your favorite Cantor set is a closed set) in is a -set. Is it true that every open set is a -set? | ||
- | Theorem 26: If is measurable, then is a zero set if and only if almost( = up to a zero set) every slice , () is measure zero. | ||