User Tools

Site Tools


math105-s22:notes:lecture_5

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math105-s22:notes:lecture_5 [2022/01/31 23:39]
pzhou
math105-s22:notes:lecture_5 [2022/02/01 23:35] (current)
pzhou
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lecture 5 ====== ====== Lecture 5 ======
 \gdef\mcal{\mathcal{M}} \gdef\mcal{\mathcal{M}}
 +
 +[[https://berkeley.zoom.us/rec/share/xjmorYXsD5aEU3_mS6oHTOc413MzXAOIKlj5v1LUWOksJVeNeLzhp-QSVBff_AEF.sRwBxAiQgwZnO3D9 | video ]]
  
 Welcome back to in-person instruction. I will continue type in here as a way to prepare for class.  Welcome back to in-person instruction. I will continue type in here as a way to prepare for class. 
Line 48: Line 50:
  
 ===== Pugh 6.4: Regularity ===== ===== Pugh 6.4: Regularity =====
-Our goal here is to prove that, any Lebesgue measurable set is a Borel set plus or minus a null-set. More precisely. EE is Lebesgue measurable, if and only if there is a GδG_\delta-set (countable intersection of open) GG, and an FσF_\sigma-set, FF, where FEGF \In E \In G, such that m(G)=m(F)m(G) = m(F).+Our goal here is to prove that, any Lebesgue measurable set is a Borel set plus or minus a null-set. More precisely. EE is Lebesgue measurable, if and only if there is a GδG_\delta-set (countable intersection of open) GG, and an FσF_\sigma-set, FF, where FEGF \In E \In G, such that m(G\F)=0m(G \RM F) = 0 (why not asking m(G)=m(F)m(G) = m(F)? )
  
  
math105-s22/notes/lecture_5.1643701193.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/01/31 23:39 by pzhou