User Tools

Site Tools


math104-s22:s:jonathanwang

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math104-s22:s:jonathanwang [2022/02/16 13:47]
jnwang19 [Questions]
math104-s22:s:jonathanwang [2022/04/25 20:00] (current)
jnwang19 [Homework]
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 2/10: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw4.pdf |}} 2/10: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw4.pdf |}}
 +
 +2/24: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw5.pdf |}}
 +
 +3/3: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw6.pdf |}}
 +
 +3/10: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw7.pdf |}}
 +
 +3/17: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw8.pdf |}}
 +
 +4/7: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw9.pdf |}}
 +
 +4/14: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw10.pdf |}}
 +
 +4/21: {{ :math104-s22:s:jonathanwang:hw11.pdf |}}
  
 ====== Questions  ====== ====== Questions  ======
Line 24: Line 38:
  
 4. In Cantor's diagonalization argument, is the reason we can't take the sequence straight downwards because there may be repeated elements? 4. In Cantor's diagonalization argument, is the reason we can't take the sequence straight downwards because there may be repeated elements?
 +
 +5. When Prof Zhou showed Cantor's diagonalization argument on 2/15, he produced a monotonically decreasing subsequence. However, I thought in general, although each sequence has a monotonic subsequence, it could be either increasing or decreasing. Thus, was the choice of monotonically decreasing just WLOG?
math104-s22/s/jonathanwang.1645048040.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/16 13:47 by jnwang19