User Tools

Site Tools


math104-f21:hw5

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
math104-f21:hw5 [2021/09/24 16:19]
pzhou created
math104-f21:hw5 [2022/01/11 18:31] (current)
24.253.46.239 ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
Line 5: Line 5:
 1. Prove that there is a sequence in R\R, whose subsequential limit set is the entire set R\R 1. Prove that there is a sequence in R\R, whose subsequential limit set is the entire set R\R
  
-2. Prove that lim sup(an+bn)lim sup(an)+lim sup(bn)\limsup(a_n+b_n) \leq \limsup(a_n) + \limsup(b_n) +2. Prove that $\limsup(a_n+b_n) \leq \limsup(a_n) + \limsup(b_n) ,where, where (a_n)and and (b_n)areboundedsequencesin are bounded sequences in \R$. 
  
 3. Give an explicit way to enumerate the set Z\Z, and then Z2\Z^2. 3. Give an explicit way to enumerate the set Z\Z, and then Z2\Z^2.
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 5. Prove that the set of maps {f:N{0,1}}\{f: \N \to \{0,1\}\} is not countable.   5. Prove that the set of maps {f:N{0,1}}\{f: \N \to \{0,1\}\} is not countable.  
 +
 +===== Solution =====
 +
 +1. Let (an)(a_n) be any sequence that enumerate of Q\Q. For any xRx \in \R, to show that xx is a subsequential limit of ana_n, we only need to show that for any $\epsilon>0and and N>0,thereisa, there is a n>N,with, with |a_n - x| < \epsilon.Supposethereisnosuchan. Suppose there is no such an n,i.e.,forall, i.e., for all n > N,wehave, we have |a_n - x|>\epsilon$, then that means there are at most NN rational numbers within $[x-\epsilon, x+\epsilon]$, which is absurd. 
 +
 +2. Let An=sup{ammn}A_n = \sup \{ a_m | m \geq n\}, and Bn=sup{bmmn}B_n = \sup \{ b_m | m \geq n\}, and Cn=sup{am+bmmn}C_n = \sup \{a_m + b_m \mid m \geq n\}. We claim that CnAn+BnC_n \leq A_n + B_n. Indeed, for any mnm \geq n, am+bmAn+Bna_m + b_m \leq A_n + B_n, hence An+BnA_n + B_n is an upper bound of the set {am+bmmn}\{a_m + b_m \mid m \geq n\}, thus CnAn+BnC_n \leq A_n + B_n. Hence, taking limit nn\to \infty, we get limnCnlimAn+limBn\lim_n C_n \leq \lim A_n + \lim B_n
 +
 +3. To enumerate Z\Z, we can do 0, 1,1, +2,2, 0,  1, -1,  + 2, -2,  \cdots .
 +
 +To enumerate Z2\Z^2, we define a function f:Z2Nf: \Z^2 \to \N, f(a,b)=a+bf(a,b) = |a| + |b|. For nNn \in \N, let  An=f1(n)={(a,b)Z2a+b=n}A_n = f^{-1}(n) = \{(a,b) \in \Z^2 \mid |a|+|b|=n\}. Then Z2=nNAn\Z^2 = \sqcup_{n \in \N} A_n, and each AnA_n is a finite set. We can enumerate A0A_0, then A1A_1, ...
 +
 +4. Let PnP_n denote the set of integer coefficient polynomials of at most degree nnPn={a0+a1x++anxaiZ}P_n = \{a_0 + a_1 x + \cdots + a_n x \mid a_i \in \Z \}. Then the set of integer coefficient polynomial P=n=0nPnP = \cup_{n=0}^n P_n, each each Pn=Zn+1P_n = \Z^{n+1}. Since finite product of countable set is countable, we have PnP_n is countable for all nn. Since countable union of countable sets are countable, we have PP being countable. 
 +
 +5. This is done is class. See Rudin Thm 2.14. 
 +{{math104-f21:pasted:20211001-220110.png}} 
 +
math104-f21/hw5.1632525574.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/09/24 16:19 by pzhou