Keep It Flowing

A view of a drilling rig and distant production platform in the Soldado Field off Trinidad's southwest coast, September 10, 2011. (Credit: Reuters/Andrea De Silva)

(Reuters) – Hackers are bombarding the world’s computer controlled energy sector, conducting industrial espionage and threatening potential global havoc through oil supply disruption.

This article published by Reuters comes out the same week that researchers at MIT released a report stating the need for better direction of protecting the nation’s electric power infrastructure. I felt this was one of the keenest observations in the article:

“Oil needs to keep on flowing,” said Riemer Brouwer, head of IT security at Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations (ADCO).

“We have a very strategic position in the global oil and gas market,” he added. “If they could bring down one of the big players in the oil and gas market you can imagine what this will do for the oil price – it would blow the market.”

Hackers could finance their operations by using options markets to bet on the price movements caused by disruptions, Brouwer said.

“So far we haven’t had any major incidents,” he said. “But are we really in control? The answer has to be ‘no’.”

So how secure are our systems really? It’s better to be preventative than to know the answer to that.

“Fewer guns, more solar arrays”

There is a large swath of the business community that continues to push for alternative energy infrastructure projects as the stimulus to getting our nation out of the current economic slump and ridding our dubious involvement in strategic energy resource-rich nation-states such as Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Read full article.

Saleh, al-Ahmar, Arcadia Petroleum and the Civil War in Yemen

Anti-government protesters shout slogans while holding a defaced portrait of Yemen's President Ali Abdullah Saleh during a demonstration demanding his ouster in Sanaa June 4, 2011.

As the violence in Yemen continues to escalate and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) probe reveals more about Arcadia Petroleum’s role in securing oil contracts in Yemen, one cannot help but wonder if there exists a more than just tenuous connection between the two high-profile events.

Bitter tensions between Saleh supporters and his defectors–the Al-Ahmar, Hashed, and Sanha camps–have fueled Yemen’s political crisis:

The CFTC’s recent allegations that Arcadia colluded with Yemeni multibillionaire Hamid al-Ahmar in order to receive uncompetitive oil bids coincides with the fomenting civil conflict in Yemen. A leaked September 2009 State Department cable says that:

an internal government shift in control over the country’s valuable oil exports, meant to open up oil bidding to more international buyers, threatened Arcadia’s sway over Yemen’s exports.

It also put at risk an alliance between Arcadia and its “local agent” in Yemen, tribal leader Hamid al-Ahmar, the cable says. Arcadia, in an interview, denied the allegations in the cable, saying it did not employ al-Ahmar as an agent, although it did work with some of his companies in the oil trading business. The company said it always paid official market prices for Yemen’s export oil.

But even if there might be no real relation whatsoever with Saleh’s refusal to relinquish his power and the “internal government shift in control” of the country’s oil resources, the international community cannot ignore the growing humanitarian crisis in Yemen as violence escalates, water resources deplete, and oil revenue remains misappropriated.

Oxfam America releases new report on food insecurity

"power above all determines who eats and who does not" (Oxfam America 2011)

“Rising food prices are tightening the squeeze on populations already struggling to buy adequate food, demanding radical reform of the global food system, Oxfam has warned.”

Link to BBC article (31 May 2011)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-13597657

Key findings of Oxfam report Growing a Better Future:

  • Traders: Four global companies control the movement of most of the world’s food. Three companies – Archer Daniels Midland, Bunge and Cargill – control an estimated 90 percent of the world’s grain trade. Their activities help drive volatile food prices and they profit from them. In the first quarter of 2008, at the height of a global food price crisis, Cargill’s profits were up 86 percent and the company is now heading for its most profitable year yet on the back of further disruptions to global food supplies.
  • India: Despite doubling the size of it economy between 1990 and 2005 the number of hungry people in India increased by 65 million – more than the population of France – because economic development excluded the rural poor and social protection schemes failed to reach them. Today one in four of the world’s hungry people live in India.
  • The world’s poorest people now spend up to 80% of their incomes on food – with those in the Philippines spending proportionately four times more than those in the UK, for instance – and more people will be pushed into hunger as food prices climb.
  • 5-Point Solution:
    1. Investing in Small-Scale Food Producers
    2. Ending Excessive Speculation in Agricultural Commodities
    3. Modernizing Food Aid
    4. Stopping Giveaways to the Corn-Ethanol Industry
    5. Regulating Land and Water Grabs

Speculators Beware!

The United States’ Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) alleges that two firms in 2008 engaged in illegal oil futures speculation. It has taken about three years, but finally some justice will come from this (albeit limited). If only the same charges can be brought against firms that speculated on food commodities will we see retribution for those that were directly affected by the violence that swept the world during the 2007-2008 global food riots.

Upward Bound

Gasoline prices in the United States have been breaking into new inflation-unadjusted territory lately. I pulled some data from the United States’ Energy Information Administration (EIA) that suggests a not so comfortable summer this year. Lets take a quick look at one of EIA’s graphs:

http://eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMM_EPM0U_PTE_NUS_DPG&f=W

If we peer into the actual numerical data, we can observe that average all-conventional U.S. retail gasoline prices over the fourth week of April 2011 (ending April 25) had a mean price of $3.867.

Since the value of the dollar right now is close to what the value of the dollar was during the depths of the liquidity crisis in 2008, I would argue that this is a valid enough reason to compare U.S. gasoline price trends today to price trends in the first half of 2008. The value of the dollar in international currency markets seems to negatively correlate enough with gasoline prices to be used as a complementary metric of the other (I’m too lazy to do the statistics for that right now).

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=dxy&insttype=&freq=2&show=&time=11&x=0&y=0

The U.S. Dollar Index tracks a basket of international currencies against the U.S. dollar. Since quite a bit of oil is exchanged for dollars in commodities markets, it might be useful to also note that the value of the dollar right now is only 1.3% more than the value of the dollar during April of 2008, only marginally worth more since the recession.  Initially, I was led to think that gas prices were perceived by Americans to be high simply because the dollar was weaker which would mean that it would cost more in dollars to purchase a barrel  of oil that would drive up the input costs to produce a gallon of gasoline. But gasoline prices year-over-year from April 2008 to April 2011 have gone up by 6.97%–far outpacing the 1.3% rise in the dollar’s worth (which currently has a downward trajectory) as well as outpacing the 2.5% inflation rate from 2008 to 2011.

Although building forecasting models from somewhat causal relationships between currencies and goods is more complex than this, we’ve at least ruled out the “weak dollar hypothesis.” If we run with the assumption that the U.S. Dollar Futures Index and gasoline prices are negatively correlated anyways, we might get a tiny sense of where gasoline prices in the United States could potentially head in a worst-case, recession style situation:

The circled table cell shows that we paid during the fourth week of April 2008 an average price of $3.615. Notice also the HUGE plummet in prices to $1.685 in December 2008. I suspect that this was due to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s 1st round of quantitative easing maneuvers (QE1) that began in November 2008.

If we look at the rate of change in month-over-month retail gasoline prices of the fourth week of each month from January-July 2008, prices went up 5.38% on average for each month in that series. If we assume the same average rate of  change in month-over-month prices of the fourth week of January until the expected mid-July peak in 2011, we can potentially see gasoline prices hitting a weekly average of $4.294 this summer and then retreating afterwards. But of course there are other factors that could contribute to how prices accelerate or decelerate from now until the end of summer. The Middle East and North Africa is going to be on everyone’s minds (even though there is no reason it should, but that’s an entirely separate conversation) as well as hurricane season in the Gulf Coast.

An Energy Crisis of the Third-World Kind

There has been an international media fanfare circling the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan over the last month since the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, but not all energy disaster coverage is created equal. Perhaps an equal amount of attention has been given to Libya and its oil. But I fear that there are other more neglected disasters which continue to get the silent treatment from the international community.

When Americans or the Western world think of the country of Somalia, what is evoked in their minds? …warlords, famine, piracy, Black Hawk Down? What about nuclear toxic waste?

I first heard about the dumping of toxic and radioactive wastes by European companies off the shores of Somalia from musician K’naan (internationally famous for writing the 2010 World Cup Anthem, “Wavin’ Flag”) as a precursor to the piracy movement in his country, but I merely brushed it aside as a rumor. However, recently, I found a post from a Minnesotan blogger who confirms K’naan’s claims via multiple official independent sources.

Some folks say that silence in the face of violence is often worse than the original crime itself. But some crimes don’t even scratch the surface of the mounting unspoken injustices of the world. As is historically the case, these environmental crimes seem to always implicate the international scramble–heinous or not–for the world’s energy and resources.

The Hubris of Empire

So it seems that once again, brilliant network and computer engineers have found a back door into some of the largest multinational corporations:

“The names and e-mails of customers of Citigroup Inc and other large U.S. companies, as well as College Board students, were exposed in a massive and growing data breach after a computer hacker penetrated online marketer Epsilon.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/04/us-citi-capitalone-data-idUSTRE7321PI20110404

Internet security has always maintained an elusive veil of protection. As much as we would like to think that the mapping of our digital selves onto cyberspace remains within our full control (especially with the advent of social networking services such as Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn), I predict that such breaches of internet security will continue to be on the rise. [1]

With respect to energy security, the most recent string of network hack-ins at major financial and energy corporations over the last couple of months [2][3] present an interesting problem to the wave of so-called “smart grid” initiatives that intend to provide more automation of our electric power systems. The current VPNs and telemetry systems that facilitate automatic generation control (AGC) to keep the United States’ electricity grid secure have historically been remarkably reliable; however, the additional layers of telecommunications infrastructure being proposed for the grid will present more opportunity for similar breaches we’ve seen at financial and oil firms. One can envision distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks orchestrated by a nation state with enough wherewithal on the future smart grid (several hackers at major banks have been traced to China DNS and IP addresses) by shutting down commercial systems to gain economic advantages.

Only time will dictate the fate of nations.

See also
[1] U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team. http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/index.html
[2] “Chinese hackers targeted Morgan Stanley in 2009.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/01/morgan-stanley-chinese-hackers (1 Mar 2011).
[3] “Data theft attacks besiege oil industry.” http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20031291-264.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=News-Security (2 Feb 2011),

i4Energy Web Seminar Series

The i4Energy seminar series is a weekly presentation series hosted by CITRIS (Center for Information Technology in the Interest of Society) at the Sutardja Dai Hall on the University of California, Berkeley campus. All of the presentations are open to the public and host various energy experts of all fields from policy, technology, and industry.

Every week I’ll be posting a new web seminar. So stay tuned!

This presentation is about 2 years old, but highlights the future progress of our electricity grid. Chris Knudsen from PG&E discusses his company’s role in developing the smart grid.

Iraqi Oil and George Soros


I’ve always respected billionaire George Soros for his sound investment strategies and his overall cool, rational demeanor when it comes to discussing markets; but this news just puts a foul stench on his pocket book:

“Last month, after years of wrangling between Kurdistan’s regional capital Erbil and Baghdad over revenues, exports finally started to flow. Foreign investors — among them Russian oligarchs, a British mercenary boss, U.S. politicians, a former diplomat, and funds controlled by the billionaire investor George Soros — who have sunk $5 billion into Kurdistan’s oil fields, hope they will finally begin to enjoy the rewards.”

via http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/10/us-kurdistan-oil-idUSTRE72921820110310