<center>2006.02.01</center>
<a name="returntobenospelling"><h3>return to benospelling?</h3></a>
<p>수요일 아침: ahhh, i can write all the benospelling i want now. &nbsp; woohoo! &nbsp; what will be my first benospelling wurd? &nbsp; heh heh... <tt>:-)</tt> 1 month w/o benospelling down n' 1 new yr's resolution completed. &nbsp; 2day's big silly valley tech/biz news's that <a href="http://www.google.co.kr" target="new"><font color="blue">g</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="yellow">o</font><font color="blue">g</font><font color="green">l</font><font color="red">e</font></a>'s stock (goog) <i>finally</i> took a tumble. &nbsp; i have many friends that werk @ <a href="http://www.google.co.kr" target="new"><font color="blue">g</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="yellow">o</font><font color="blue">g</font><font color="green">l</font><font color="red">e</font></a>, so i don't rejoice in this; but it <i>is</i> interesting news. &nbsp; i <i>do</i> wish that 17 months 'go, i had bought ~$100 goog stock n' also wish i could've dumped tons'f goog stock <i>yesterday</i>. &nbsp; it's funny cos i was looking @ goog stock yesterday just cos i've been researching the stock market a li'l more these days w/ renewed interest in investing. &nbsp; i don't think i'll be investing in individual stocks netime <i>2</i> soon. &nbsp; more likely, i'll just be buying mutual funds 4 a while. &nbsp; neway, i <i>was</i> indeed looking @ goog stock yetserday n' imagining how i could've quadrupled my investment. &nbsp; imagine if i had invested $10,000 n' gotten back $40,000. &nbsp; even after taxes, wouldn't that buy me a new car? *shrug* maybe u can read this forbes.com article about <a href="http://www.google.co.kr" target="new"><font color="blue">g</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="yellow">o</font><font color="blue">g</font><font color="green">l</font><font color="red">e</font></a>:
<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/02/01/google-earnings-stock-cx_ck_0201google.html?partner=benomix.com" target="new"><font face="times new roman" color="black">"reading google's tea leaves."</font></a> &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.co.kr" target="new"><font color="blue">g</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="yellow">o</font><font color="blue">g</font><font color="green">l</font><font color="red">e</font></a> still has 1 kick@$$ cafeteria! &nbsp; according to this article, <a href="http://www.google.co.kr" target="new"><font color="blue">g</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="yellow">o</font><font color="blue">g</font><font color="green">l</font><font color="red">e</font></a>'s 2 secretive 'bout its future. &nbsp; yah, maybe so. &nbsp; it cms that everything's <i>sooo</i> top sekret there. &nbsp; however, all 'round this greater tech industry, that's sort'f the case. &nbsp; would <i>now</i> be a good time to buy goog stock? &nbsp; *shrug* i don't have that kind'f $$$. &nbsp; right??? &nbsp; it takes $$$ to make $$$.
<p>[later] <i>fun with dick and jane</i> was a fun movie. &nbsp; jim carrey is still a funny guy even if i find that his humour <i>has</i> had the tendency to border on annoying in the past. &nbsp; while watching the trailers, i observed a trend 2wards movies 'bout young families, ppl like my sista grace n' her husband steve. &nbsp; wow, the industry cms to c a market in the maturing gen.x, eh?
<p>[later] last nite dubyah had some big speech, n' i guess that's also big news 2day. &nbsp; well, i guess it was some beginning'f the yr speech, but i don't think he sed nething 2 important, just ur typikal rhetoric.
<p>on the kntv nbc 11 morning news, this 1 funny guy mike inouye has been giving traffik reports each morning 4 the past few months. &nbsp; he's a really funny guy n' cmed to be gaining a good deal'f popularity as he got his own segment on show or sumpthin' called sumpthin' like "where in the bay area is mike inouye." &nbsp; neway, he disappeared 4 the last month or so, n' i worried that he left, but i heard the news team mention his name now n' then. &nbsp; apparently, he n' his wife gave birth to  a baby son named mason. &nbsp; he returned this morn, n' the news team chatted it up 'bout his new son.
<p>[later] 오후: a while 'go, i stumbled upon this kewl site that tells u nutritional information about many restaurants: <a href="http://www.dwlz.com/index.html" target="new">"dotti's weight loss zone"</a> (http://www.dwlz.com/index.html). &nbsp; can u believe that the rubio's carnitas street taco is so much healthier than their fish taco? &nbsp; in fact, the carnitas street taco appears to be healthier than the chicken street taco!
<table>
<caption align=top>rubio's baja grill - nutritional info</caption>
<tr>
  <th></th>
</tr>
<tr>
  <th>menu item</th>
  <th>kcals</th>
  <th>fat (g)</th>
  <th>fibre (g)</th>
  <th>carbs (g)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>3 fish tacos</td>
  <td>1130</td>
  <td>29</td>
  <td>10</td>
  <td>90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>3 carnitas street tacos</td>
  <td>640</td>
  <td>25</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>3 chicken street tacos</td>
  <td>640</td>
  <td>22</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>3 carne asada street tacos</td>
  <td>600</td>
  <td>29</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>58</td>
</tr>
</table>
thus it appears that carne asada street tacos trumps the others.
<p>ooh, let's now check out in.n.out!
<table>
<caption align=top>in.n.out - nutritional info</caption>
<tr>
  <th>menu item</th>
  <th>kcals</th>
  <th>fat (g)</th>
  <th>fibre (g)</th>
  <th>carbs (g)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>hamburger w/ onion</td>
  <td>390</td>
  <td>19</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>hamburger w/ onion w/ mustard n' ketchup instead'f spread</td>
  <td>310</td>
  <td>10</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>hamburger w/ onion protein style</td>
  <td>240</td>
  <td>17</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>ch.burger w/ onion</td>
  <td>480</td>
  <td>27</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>ch.burger w/ onion w/ mustard n' ketchup instead'f spread</td>
  <td>400</td>
  <td>18</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>ch.burger w/ onion protein style</td>
  <td>330</td>
  <td>25</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>2x2 w/ onion</td>
  <td>670</td>
  <td>41</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>2x2 w/ onion w/ mustard n' ketchup instead'f spread</td>
  <td>590</td>
  <td>32</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>2x2 w/ onion protein style</td>
  <td>520</td> 
  <td>39</td>
  <td>3</td>
  <td>11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td>french fries</td>
  <td>400</td>
  <td>18</td>
  <td>2</td>
  <td>54</td>
</tr>
</table>
so apparently, protein style's a good idea... however, it's messy, n' the bun tastes 2 good. *sigh* &nbsp; notice that the special sauce's quite the culprit!
<p><a
href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-1808807-10391416?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ebuy%2Ecom%2Fretail%2Fcoupon%2Easp%3Fprid%3D83283908">valentines day 5% off coupon at buy.com for the music, music downloads, and dvds atores - valid feb 1 thru feb 14</a><br><br><br>