|
||
Title: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 8th, 2016, 12:31pm A skydiver jumps out of a plane and reaches terminal velocity in freefall. However, his terminal velocity decreases even though there were no air currents and he wasn’t freeflying. What happened? |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by dudiobugtron on Aug 8th, 2016, 3:32pm I guess it depends on how brave the skydiver is. If he is merely quite brave, then [hide]he deployed his parachute[/hide]. However, perhaps if he is very brave, then [hide]he landed[/hide] instead! |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 9th, 2016, 12:55am I meant that at some point he still has terminal velocity but somehow it happens to be slower than the initial terminal velocity. Science is not my thing but I am sure you get what I'm talking about. Needless to say the riddle has omitted facts and it happens to be not exactly an ordinary situation and with a certain coincidence. |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by towr on Aug 9th, 2016, 8:48am [hide]Air is denser the lower you get, therefore the terminal velocity is lower. And it also depends on your position. Head-first and arms at your side you get a higher velocity than with your body into the wind and arms and legs outstretched.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 9th, 2016, 8:57am I guess I am ignorant after all in that, I failed to mention that terminal velocity was significantly slower later on. |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by dudiobugtron on Aug 10th, 2016, 3:29pm on 08/09/16 at 00:55:26, alien2 wrote:
[hide]Zero is not slow enough for you?[/hide] ;) As for my next guess; [hide]The skydiver is actually a 'bungee jumper'[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 10th, 2016, 4:50pm Nope. I'm afraid the riddle has [hide]a tragic end.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 16th, 2016, 4:26am on 08/10/16 at 15:29:55, dudiobugtron wrote:
I'm sorry. You're not speaking my language. For a moment there I thought you was referring to a Japanese plane. |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by Grimbal on Aug 19th, 2016, 8:57am He used the ejectable seat. He fell UP, reached the top of the free-fall curve and then fell down. I am not sure that counts as terminal velocity before the speed is stabilized. Or maybe he vomit in mid-air. Less weight and same surface gives lower terminal velocity. |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 19th, 2016, 12:24pm on 08/19/16 at 08:57:26, Grimbal wrote:
This answer made me laugh. I needn't tell you it is ultimately incorrect. |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by dudiobugtron on Aug 19th, 2016, 11:46pm Perhaps the man was [hide]on another planet. For example, Jupiter.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 20th, 2016, 2:10am on 08/19/16 at 23:46:15, dudiobugtron wrote:
He needn't be [hide]on another planet[/hide] to produce the effect you are looking for. See what I mean? |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by dudiobugtron on Aug 20th, 2016, 3:01am Oh, I think I see! [hide]The man doesn't stop falling when he reaches ground level, and instead continues to fall through a (very unlikely) hole in the ground.[/hide] [hide]Or, perhaps, the hole he fell through was a wormhole, which took him to somewhere with much denser air.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 20th, 2016, 3:42am It ain't [hide]a hole in the ground or a wormhole.[/hide] But keep thinking like that. The clue: [hide]The man had to jump out of the plane. He had no choice.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by towr on Aug 20th, 2016, 1:07pm [hide]He hit water?[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Terminal velocity Post by alien2 on Aug 20th, 2016, 1:12pm on 08/20/16 at 13:07:49, towr wrote:
Yep. [hide]He died in the ocean where he reached terminal velocity.[/hide] |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |