|
||
Title: Detective Hopper Post by Iceman on Aug 31st, 2007, 11:19am The detective Hopper is investigating a case, and some facts bring him to a drug addict, a naked man w/o consciousness he never saw before. The man is just lying still in an empty room, except for the syringe and elastic bend, thus he clearly overdosed himself. The detective requests an ambulance right a way, using the living room's phone. When he returns to the room, the detective soon realizes that the man's vision isn't 20/20. He also realizes that he was married, and what particular footwear he wears. But how? |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by SMQ on Aug 31st, 2007, 11:40am [hide]With long-term use, eyeglasses, rings, and sandals would all leave distinctive markingson the skin...[/hide] --SMQ |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by denis on Aug 31st, 2007, 12:39pm While he was in the living room, the detective saw [hide]the different family pictures on the fireplace[/hide] that provided all those details. |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by gotit on Aug 31st, 2007, 2:10pm Detective Hopper might have [hide]checked the telephone diary that was kept beside the telephone.He found that the phone numbers of some eye clinics were written in the diary.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by gotit on Aug 31st, 2007, 3:33pm The living room [hide]was quiet well organized.Hopper realized that it is unlikely for a bachelor,who is also a drug-addict,to keep his house so organized.[/hide]So he guessed that the man must have been married. |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by gotit on Aug 31st, 2007, 4:41pm [hide]Hopper finds that the right toe(or may be the left) of the man is missing.So he cannot wear sandals.[/hide] So he realizes that the man must be wearing shoes. |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by Grimbal on Sep 1st, 2007, 5:40am There is a white cane, black glasses and a picture of his wife. ::) For the footwear, being naked would imply he doesn't wear any. |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by Iceman on Sep 2nd, 2007, 6:02am on 08/31/07 at 11:40:39, SMQ wrote:
Yes, [hide]he had deep marks.[/hide] 8) |
||
Title: Re: Detective Hopper Post by Iceman on Sep 3rd, 2007, 7:03am SMQ, I don't want to depreciate your fine idea, but do you like Conan Doyle? ;) ::) |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |