|
||
Title: Is this the correct proof of Goldbach Conjecture? Post by anonymous on Apr 28th, 2003, 4:44pm http://jamesjoe.51.net/papers/paper01.html The proof is in chinese language. Can anyone verify its correctness? |
||
Title: Re: Is this the correct proof of Goldbach Conjectu Post by william wu on Aug 31st, 2003, 4:02am i wish my chinese was good enough to read that :( |
||
Title: Re: Is this the correct proof of Goldbach Conjectu Post by Braincramps on May 10th, 2004, 2:35pm The one-line proof in Mandarin reads: Account closed, please contact us. |
||
Title: Re: Is this the correct proof of Goldbach Conjectu Post by towr on May 10th, 2004, 2:42pm You might consider that this wasn't the case one year ago, when the thread was started.. |
||
Title: Re: Is this the correct proof of Goldbach Conjectu Post by jamesjoe on Aug 20th, 2004, 10:38pm That paper is not correct enough to proof the Goldbach conjectureI |
||
Title: Re: Is this the correct proof of Goldbach Conjectu Post by Grimbal on Aug 21st, 2004, 3:53pm The abstract says: "The author has proved that 4 has the specific solution of ?1+1?, and an even number more than 4 has the general solution of ?1+1?." If he can prove that 1+1 = 4, he can prove anything. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |