|
||
Title: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by O2009 on Oct 18th, 2009, 9:59pm Let ABCD be a cyclic quadrilateral with no parallel sides. Let AB and CD intersect at M and let AD and BC intersect at N. Prove that the circle with MN as diameter is orthogonal to the circle through ABCD. |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by humbern on Mar 23rd, 2010, 8:26pm I've been playing with this far too long, with no joy. Cyclic quads, ortho circs, harmonic division. Can the author or a kind soul help out? ...And explain how this is "easy"? |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by towr on Mar 24th, 2010, 3:09am Nice picture, what software did you use for that? Anyway, I think by now we can safely assume this problem isn't easy. I'll move it to medium for now. |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by humbern on Mar 24th, 2010, 8:12am The software is Cinderella. The frustration is mine. Any ideas out there? |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by Ronno on Apr 1st, 2010, 6:10am Yes I agree, this should be at least in medium. Having solved this before I'll give a hint. In your diagram, notice that [hide]AC, BD and LT are concurrent[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by humbern on Apr 2nd, 2010, 2:17pm Thank you! And . . . cool! And . . . I have to think about this.... |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by malchar on Apr 2nd, 2010, 10:24pm What does it mean for circles to be orthogonal? |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by towr on Apr 3rd, 2010, 3:11am on 04/02/10 at 22:24:30, malchar wrote:
|
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by humbern on May 17th, 2010, 9:26am Somebody please post an answer. This is killing me. |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by Grimbal on May 19th, 2010, 5:44am I also don't know the answer. But it seems that the line MN is the polar of the intersection of AC and BD. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InversePoints.html I don't know if that helps. |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by JohanC on May 21st, 2010, 1:05pm on 05/19/10 at 05:44:23, Grimbal wrote:
In that case, you might also be interested in http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/SymmetryInCircle.shtml and http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/InversionDemo.shtml There are some nice applets to play with. |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by Noke Lieu on May 23rd, 2010, 9:04pm ... I struggle to check if I've got the cart before the horse, but taking a simplistic approach... MTN is 90o Point Y is where TN bisects circle ABCD extend PT throught to the other side of the circle ABCD to point Z That also gives TYZ as 90o From there, angle MT(red circle tangent)= angle TZY... and so on. (did have a diag, but can't seem to save it, sorry) actually, I reckon I've stuffed up- This only follows if they're orthongonal. |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by Immanuel_Bonfils on May 27th, 2010, 9:38pm Grimbal went close! Indeed, line MN is polar of the intersection of AC and BD, let's call it X.. But the best is that the line MK is polar of N wrt circumcircle O1, of the quadrilateral ABCD, so MK is perpendicular to ON, let's say at Y, and Y is a point of the circle O2 with diameter MN. So from the condition for Y to be the inverse (or the image) of N wrt O1 we have |OY|.|ON| = |OT|2, where T is a point of O1 and |OT| is his radius. But |OY|.|ON| = |OT|2 is also the power of O wrt O2, so OT is the tangent to O2 taken from O . Done . It's circle inverse geometry, but I think folks aren't much fan of, since I've post some time ago a problem in the subject http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_medium;action=display;num=1214764919 and nothing happened... |
||
Title: Re: Cyclic quadrilateral and orthogonal circle Post by humbern on Jun 1st, 2010, 12:22pm Thank you so much! This is actually really thrilling, although I'm still trying to put your reasoning into the simplest possible terms, given my purely recreational background. But I see the through-line. You might be interested to know that the forward to the recent biography of Donald Coxeter was written by Douglas Hofstadter (of Goedel, Escher, Bach fame), and he recalls his biggest aha! moment of math education as being taught about circle inversion. I'll be thinking about your "nothing happened" problem as soon as I can explain this current one to my co-workers, who have watched me banging my head... |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |