|
||
Title: 271 Post by tereferekuku on Sep 21st, 2009, 12:27pm "Write 271 as the sum of positive real numbers so as to maximize their product." SOLUTION: e^99*e^(271/e-99) |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by towr on Sep 21st, 2009, 1:29pm I don't see any + sign, or a http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/sum.gif. So at the very least you haven't written 271 as the sum of anything. And e^99 + e^(271/e-99) isn't 271 either; it's rather a long way off. |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by tereferekuku on Sep 21st, 2009, 3:21pm OK, sum_1^99{e} + e^{271/e-99}. Is that better? |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by BenVitale on Sep 21st, 2009, 3:35pm I worked on this problem just few days ago. See Here (http://qbyte.org/puzzles/p008s.html) |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by towr on Sep 22nd, 2009, 1:45am on 09/21/09 at 15:21:58, tereferekuku wrote:
|
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by tereferekuku on Sep 22nd, 2009, 3:21am Yes, of course, I meant sum_1^99{e} + e*{271/e-99}, which adds up just fine to 271, but the issue I forgot about is that ALL factors should be equal in order to maximize the product, hence Ben's solution is still slightly bigger than mine. |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by R on Sep 23rd, 2009, 9:11pm What is so special about 271? |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by BenVitale on Sep 23rd, 2009, 10:06pm Consider, for example, 271 is the smallest prime p such that (p - 1) and (p + 1) are each divisible by a cube greater than one. http://primes.utm.edu/curios/page.php/271.html |
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by towr on Sep 24th, 2009, 12:21am on 09/23/09 at 21:11:35, R wrote:
|
||
Title: Re: 271 Post by R on Sep 24th, 2009, 12:57am on 09/23/09 at 22:06:49, BenVitale wrote:
lol ;D Maths have a story behind every number. :P |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |