|
||||||||
Title: Three Snow Ploughs Post by ThudanBlunder on Feb 19th, 2009, 6:23am It began snowing at a constant rate before midday. Three ploughs set out at midday, 1.00pm, and 2.00pm, repectively, removing snow at a constant rate. If at some later time they all came together simultaneously, what was this time and when did it begin snowing? |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by balakrishnan on Feb 24th, 2009, 2:26pm Since no one has replied(including EigenRay), it clearly means that no one understood what "came together simultaneously" means. |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by towr on Feb 24th, 2009, 2:29pm Yeah, I had been meaning to ask, are they driving the same stretch of road? |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by Grimbal on Feb 24th, 2009, 2:44pm I guess that they follow the same stretch, #1 will slow down more and more and eventually #2, who benefits from the path opened by #1, will catch up on him. It seems under some circumstances, #3 will also catch up on #2. And in one particular case #3 will catch up on #2 exactly when #2 catches up on #1. You need to find in which case. |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by Obob on Feb 24th, 2009, 7:39pm Although mustn't the velocity of the trailing plows tend to infinity in the moments before they catch up? |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by Grimbal on Feb 25th, 2009, 2:01am Even twice infinity for the second one ;) I guess you can solve it ignoring special relativity. Ignore also the physical size of the snow ploughs. |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by ThudanBlunder on Mar 3rd, 2009, 11:35am on 02/24/09 at 14:29:06, towr wrote:
Had more than one (stretch of) road been necessary, I feel sure the question would have mentioned them. As it didn't, one can assume that one (narrow) road is sufficient. on 02/24/09 at 14:26:21, balakrishnan wrote:
It means, when considered as points, their position vectors coincide. on 02/25/09 at 02:01:24, Grimbal wrote:
If this had been a challenge from a Bernoulli, I'm sure Isaac would have solved it in a jiffy. :P on 02/24/09 at 19:39:29, Obob wrote:
They meet before infinity becomes a non-issue. Consider dx/dt, dy/dt, dz/dt, where x,y,z are respective distances travelled in t hours past midday. |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by balakrishnan on Mar 4th, 2009, 7:26am It started snowing at 11:20 am and they met at 2:19:16 pm (ie 2hours, 19 minutes and 16 seconds) Let s be the rate at which it snows. Let R be the rate at which the plough removes the snow. Consider the first plough, Let the position be p1 We see that the equation of motion would be dp1/dt= R/[s(t+t0)] where t is the time (wrt 12 noon) and 12-t0 is the time at which it started snowing. Solving gives t1=t0(esp1/R-1) For the second plough , let p2 be the position. We see that dp2/dt is R/[s(t-t1(p2))] With boundary conditions p2(1)=0, we get t2=(1+t0-st0 p2/R)esp2/R-t0 Similarly for the third plough t3=-t0+esp3/R [0.5(st0 p3/R)2+2+t0-s(1+t0)p3/R) Solving t1=t2=t3 gives t0=2/3 or it started snowing at 11:20 am and they met somewhere between 2:19:15:53 pm and 2:19:15:54 pm(ie 2hours, 19 minutes,15 seconds and 53 ms) |
||||||||
Title: Re: Three Snow Ploughs Post by ThudanBlunder on Mar 17th, 2009, 5:37pm balakrishnan, I think I have the same equations as you, but not exactly the same conclusion. Let s/R = k Let n be the number of hours before midday that it starts snowing. Let x,y,z be the respective distances travelled in t hours past midday. Then dt/dx = k(t + n), with x = 0 when t = 0 Giving t = n(ekx - 1) And dt/dy = t - n(eky - 1), with y = 0 when t = 1 Giving t = eky[1 + n - ny] - n And dt/dz = t - ez[n(1 - z) + 1] - n, with z = 0 when t = 2 Giving t = ekz[0.5nz2 - (n + 1)z + n + 2] - n Let d = the common value of x,y,z when the ploughs meet. Let T = the value of t when the ploughs meet. Then (T + n)/ekd = n = 1 + n - nd = 0.5nd2 - (n + 1)d + n + 2 Leading to n = 1/2 d = 2 T = (e2k - 1)/2 So the time of meeting would seem to depend on the ratio s/R = k Putting k = 1 gives T = (e2 - 1)/2 = 3.194528... In the graph below k = 1 and n = 1/2 CONCLUSION: The 2nd plough was manufactured in a Communist country, after all. LOL |
||||||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |