|
||
Title: 16 = x^8 Post by Barukh on Nov 25th, 2008, 9:12am Prove that number 16 is, modulo EVERY odd prime, an 8th power. Edited according to pex's remark. |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by towr on Nov 25th, 2008, 9:38am I don't think you need to specify 'odd', since 0 is an 8th power as well. |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by pex on Nov 25th, 2008, 11:36am on 11/25/08 at 09:12:09, Barukh wrote:
16 = 48 (mod 3) For some reason I suspect that that was not your intention... ::) Edit - just realizing you probably mean "modulo EVERY odd prime"... |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Immanuel_Bonfils on Nov 25th, 2008, 12:29pm Except 2, isn't a prime always odd? |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by ThudanBlunder on Nov 25th, 2008, 4:30pm on 11/25/08 at 12:29:06, Immanuel_Bonfils wrote:
Isn't "every odd prime" shorter than "every prime, except 2"? |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Noke Lieu on Nov 25th, 2008, 5:03pm except if 2 is the only even prime, then it's quite odd... ::) |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Eigenray on Nov 26th, 2008, 7:59am on 11/25/08 at 09:38:04, towr wrote:
Yes, but "mod p" is actually code for "in http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/bbq.gifp", and 16 is not an 8-th power in http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/bbq.gif2. So it is not true in general that if a is almost everywhere locally an n-th power, then a is globally an n-th power. But it is true if the field you are working in contains a primitive n-th root of unity. Thus, an integer is a square mod p for almost all p iff it is the square of an integer. (In fact more is true: let K be a number field, and suppose that the field obtained by adjoining a primitive 2t root of unity is a cyclic extension of K. If 2t is the largest power of 2 dividing n, then any element of K which is locally an n-th power almost everywhere is an n-th power in K. So for K=http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/bbq.gif, the result holds as long as 8 doesn't divide n.) By the way, Wang used this fact (that 16 is almost everywhere locally an 8-th power) to find a counterexample to Grunwald's theorem, 15 years after it was first "proved"! |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Barukh on Nov 26th, 2008, 10:23am Oops... I've just realized there was a flaw in my argument, and so, actually, I don't know the proof of this statement (which in any case remains a theorem). ??? |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Eigenray on Nov 27th, 2008, 7:51am Hmm, should I give a hint then? Consider two cases depending on whether [hide]p http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/equiv.gif 1 mod 8[/hide]. |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Barukh on Nov 28th, 2008, 11:16am on 11/27/08 at 07:51:05, Eigenray wrote:
??? Doesn't help too much. I tried to consider different cases [hide] p mod 4, and got to conclusion that when p = 1 mod 4, -4 is the 4th power mod p[/hide], but can't prove it. But I am sure you had something easier in mind. |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Eigenray on Nov 28th, 2008, 12:25pm Think about the group (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/bbz.gif/p)*. Why is p http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/ne.gif 1 mod 8 significant? |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Barukh on Dec 1st, 2008, 4:31am on 11/28/08 at 12:25:56, Eigenray wrote:
As it's posted, I can't see anything except the order of any element is not divisible by 8... BTW, considering Legendre symbol, the statement follows for both p = 1, 7 mod 8 (since then (2/p) = 1). |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Eigenray on Dec 1st, 2008, 11:06am And which finite abelian groups do you think have the property that every multiple of 4 is also a multiple of 8? |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Eigenray on Dec 6th, 2008, 1:20pm If G is a finite abelian group, consider the chain G http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/supseteq.gif G2 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/supseteq.gif G4 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/supseteq.gif G8, where Gn = { gn : g http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/in.gif G }. |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Barukh on Dec 8th, 2008, 4:30am OK, I think I got it. Let's see: given a cyclic group G of order n, generated by an element g, the subgroup Gk is generated by gk and has order n/gcd(n,k). If p http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/ne.gif 1 mod 8, then p-1 = 2st, where s http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif 2, t odd. Then, gcd(p-1, 4) = gcd(p-1, 8), and therefore G4 = G8. But 16 = 24, and we are done! Makes sense? |
||
Title: Re: 16 = x^8 Post by Eigenray on Dec 8th, 2008, 8:09am Yep. In fact, for any finite abelian group G, the index of G2 in G is a power of 2 (the number of even summands when you write G as a direct sum of cyclic groups -- or, to be fancy, the rank when you tensor the Z-module G with Z/2). So if G > G2 > G4 > G8, then |G| must be divisible by 8. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |