wu :: forums (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
riddles >> medium >> Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
(Message started by: Aryabhatta on Jun 8th, 2008, 11:26am)

Title: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 8th, 2008, 11:26am
Interesting result:

Show that, any integer n can be written in the form

n = sum ak k2 where k ranges from 1 to m for some positive integer m and each ak is either 1 or -1.

(note: m is dependent on n)

For example:

2 = - 12 - 22 -32 + 42

Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Barukh on Jun 8th, 2008, 9:26pm
[hide]Since for every k, k2 - (k+1)2 - (k+2)2 + (k+3)2 = 4, it  suffices to show that the statement holds for n = 1, 2, 3.[/hide]

Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 8th, 2008, 9:55pm
Very nice proof Barukh!

I had a much much more complicated proof and I also used (in fact needed) the help of a computer... but the result was stronger: There are an infinite number of such representations for each n.

Your proof can easily be extended to do the same.

Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Eigenray on Jun 8th, 2008, 11:45pm
In fact we can show that there is always an m < C*n1/3.

What's the best value of C you can prove?  (For n sufficiently large, i.e., bound limsup (smallest m)/n1/3)

Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 9th, 2008, 12:25am
The proof I have shows that any m for which

(m(m+1)(2m+1) -2s)/12 > 128

and LHS is an integer will do.

so it seems like C = 1 from that (though I am not sure).



Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Eigenray on Jun 9th, 2008, 1:34am
What is s?  And clearly the liminf is 31/3.

Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 9th, 2008, 10:16am
Sorry. s = n, the number which we intend to write as sum of squares.


Title: Re: Sum of squares with coeffs as 1 or -1
Post by Eigenray on Jun 9th, 2008, 10:39am
Interesting.  It looks like you are attacking it from the left.  I was thinking: [hide]we can make the difference O(n2/3) using the first O(n1/3) terms of the form k2, then make it O(n1/3) using O(n1/3) terms of the form 2k+1; with at most one more term we make the error 0 mod 4, then use O(n1/3) 4s[/hide].  But I did not feel like putting in the constants.

We had a similar problem [link=http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/%7Ewwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_easy;action=display;num=1134435769]before[/link].



Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board