|
||
Title: prove sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 Post by tony123 on Aug 4th, 2007, 9:35am prove sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 // title changed --towr (I'm not good at coming up with titles either, but when the entire problem statement fits there, why not!) |
||
Title: Re: prove Post by K Sengupta on Aug 5th, 2007, 2:01am At the outset, I would like to state that I found the fundamental tenets inclusive of the problem problem very interesting and I am positing a proposed solution in my subsequent post. However, the problem title appears to be a duplication of a title corresponding to a previous contribution by the same author . In my opinion this is at direct variance with the provisions governing the website. Accordingly, I would request for moderator intervention to change the problem title. |
||
Title: Re: prove Post by K Sengupta on Aug 5th, 2007, 2:03am Method 1: [hide]Substituting h = 40o, 80o, 160o in turn, we observe that: cos 3h =-1/2, for each of the foregoing values, and accordingly: 8 cos3h – 6 cos h + 1 =0 Therefore, cos 40, cos 80 and cos 160 are the roots of the cubic equation 8 y3 – 6 y + 1 =0; for y = cos h and so, their respective reciprocals sec 40, sec 80 and sec 160 correspond to the roots of the cubic equation : y3 – 6y + 8 = 0, and therefore: The sum of the roots of the cubic is 6. Consequently: [EDIT] sec 40o + sec 80o + sec 160o = 6[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: prove Post by ThudanBlunder on Aug 5th, 2007, 4:19am on 08/05/07 at 02:01:22, K Sengupta wrote:
Yes, it has happened more than once (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=riddles_medium;action=display;num=1184282061;start=2#2). As for the problem, it would be more interesting and harder if he asked to solve secx + sec2x + sec4x = 6 The above property of http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/pi.gif/9 is not on Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigonometryAnglesPi9.html) (although Morrie's Law (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MorriesLaw.html) is). |
||
Title: Re: prove Post by JocK on Aug 5th, 2007, 5:02am Cute problem. on 08/05/07 at 04:19:19, ThudanBlunder wrote:
Thinking about it, I'd like the formulation: Prove that the three numbers cos40°, cos80° and cos160° have arithmetic mean 0, harmonic mean 1/2 and geometric mean -1/2. |
||
Title: Re: prove sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 Post by tony123 on Aug 5th, 2007, 2:28pm K Sengupta Method 1: i think its rong and cos 40 + cos 80 + cos 160 not= 6 the problem is sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 |
||
Title: Re: prove sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 Post by JocK on Aug 5th, 2007, 2:44pm on 08/05/07 at 14:28:41, tony123 wrote:
Actualy, Sengupta is right: the stated follows from applying Viete's formulas to the cubic equation in cos(x) resulting from expressing 2cos(3x)+1=0 in terms of cos(x). It's just that in the very last line of his post a triple typo ('cos' instead of 'sec') pops up. |
||
Title: Re: prove sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 Post by K Sengupta on Aug 6th, 2007, 8:32am on 08/05/07 at 14:44:06, JocK wrote:
True. I was careless and made the typo of triple cos instead of sec. I confirm having corrected the foregoing anomaly. |
||
Title: Re: prove sec40° + sec80° + sec160° =6 Post by K Sengupta on Aug 6th, 2007, 8:56am I furnish hereunder, a second proposed method giving the solution to the problem. I am not certain if this corresponds to the author's official solution. Method 2 [hide]sec 40 + sec 80 + sec 160 = (cos 40 + cos 80)/(cos 40*cos80) + 1/(cos 160) = (2*cos 60*cos 20)/(cos 40*cos 80) + 1/ (cos 160) = (cos 20*cos 160 + cos 40*cos 80)/(cos 40*cos 80*cos 160) = (cos 180 + cos 140 + cos 120 + cos 40)/ {cos 40*(cos 240 + cos 80)} = (-1 - 1/2)/{(1/2)(-cos 40 + cos 120 + cos 40)} = (-3/2)/(-1/4) = 6[/hide] |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |