|
||
Title: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Eigenray on Aug 29th, 2006, 7:31pm Suppose n=a2+b2 is square-free (a,b integers). Evaluate Sum( floor[ sqrt(kn) ], k=1..n ). |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Sameer on Aug 29th, 2006, 9:35pm What does square-free mean? |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Barukh on Aug 30th, 2006, 12:41am on 08/29/06 at 21:35:53, Sameer wrote:
Square-free numbers have no divisors that are perfect squares. In other words, they are products of different primes. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Sameer on Aug 30th, 2006, 10:40am on 08/30/06 at 00:41:35, Barukh wrote:
Ah in short a^2 + b^2 <> c^2 for any c belongs to Z. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by towr on Aug 30th, 2006, 12:46pm on 08/30/06 at 10:40:29, Sameer wrote:
Many non-squares are still squarefree. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Sameer on Aug 30th, 2006, 6:29pm Is it [hide]2*(a^2 + b^2) or 2n?[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Icarus on Aug 30th, 2006, 7:13pm No. Since n >= k, kn >= k2, so the sum is >= the sum of all natural numbers up to n, which is n(n+1)/2. By experiment, here are the values for the first few square-free n: n -> Sum 2 -> 3 3 -> 6 5 -> 17 6 -> 24 7 -> 32 10 -> 67 11 -> 80 13 -> 113 14 -> 130 15 -> 148 17 -> 193 19 -> 240 21 -> 293 [e] just realized that I forgot to limit my list to only those n that can be expressed as a sum of squares. I leave it to you to sort out which ones Eigenray is asking about...[/e] |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Sameer on Aug 31st, 2006, 9:57am Yes, once again thanks for pointing out my obvious blunders with a big thud... For starters we can always compares the answer for n=13 (4+9), sum=113 or n=5(4+1), sum=17 or n=2(1+1), sum=3... back to drawing board... |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Sameer on Oct 26th, 2006, 11:55pm *bump* any hints? |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Eigenray on Oct 27th, 2006, 11:58am Think on the other side of the box. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Sjoerd Job Postmus on Oct 27th, 2006, 4:21pm May I assume it's similar to [hide]2/3*n^2[/hide]? At least it kind-of looks like it... |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Michael_Dagg on Oct 31st, 2006, 4:04pm Nice problem! Experiment with [hide]the sum sqrt(kn)[/hide]. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Barukh on Nov 2nd, 2006, 9:09am The solution to this lovely problem escapes me... I guess I need another hint... ::) |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Eigenray on Nov 3rd, 2006, 9:54pm What is the sum counting? |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Eigenray on Dec 16th, 2006, 12:59pm The solution to the given problem involves only elementary number theory; you don't need to know, for example, that n is the product of primes each 1 or 2 mod 4. And you certainly don't need to understand the following: if we replace n by a prime p which is 3 mod 4, then Sumk=1p floor[sqrt(kp)] = (2p2+1)/3 - h, where h is the class number of the field Q(sqrt(-p)). This is result is much more advanced. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Barukh on Dec 18th, 2006, 11:25pm Eigenray, after you supplied so many hints and gave the answer, I still cannot make any progress. Maybe, this problem is too difficult for me. ::) |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Eigenray on Dec 19th, 2006, 9:39am Maybe I should have been more direct: evaluate Sumk=1n floor[ [hide]k2/n[/hide] ] |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Barukh on Dec 21st, 2006, 10:24am Step by step... on 12/19/06 at 09:39:35, Eigenray wrote:
I was able to show that under given conditions this sum equals (n2+2)/3. |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Eigenray on Dec 24th, 2006, 3:41pm Correct! So what's the answer to the original problem? |
||
Title: Re: Sum(floor[sqrt(kn)], k=1..n) Post by Barukh on Dec 25th, 2006, 9:52am My stupidity really has no limits! Denote: sn(k) = floor(k2/n), Sn = http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/sum.gifk = 1 .. n sn(k) = (n2 + 2)/3 (Eigenray’s auxiliary sum). Then: http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/sum.gifk = 1 .. n floor(sqrt((kn)) = (!) = http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/sum.gifk = 1 .. n-1 k [sn(k+1)- sn(k)] + 1 = n2 - Sn + 1 = (2n2 + 1)/3. Analyzing the blackout, I now understand that it was caused by my willing to derive directly the relation between the two sums: original and Sn (the former being one less than twice the other). To be continued... |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |