|
||
Title: Vectors Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Jan 9th, 2004, 12:30am Given a finite set S of 2D vectors whose absolute magnitudes sum to 1, what is the maximum value of x such that for every S there exists a subset of S whose sum has absolute magnitude x? |
||
Title: Re: Vectors Post by towr on Jan 9th, 2004, 12:57am ::[hide]since S is a subset of S, I would say x=1 If you want to have a proper subset (one which is smaller than the original set) then x=0, since S could have just one element, and the only proper subset would be the empty set and a sum over an empty domain is 0.[/hide]:: |
||
Title: Re: Vectors Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Jan 9th, 2004, 6:01am Good point, perspicacious towr. Assume we are considering only non-empty proper subsets of a finite set. |
||
Title: Re: Vectors Post by rmsgrey on Jan 9th, 2004, 7:11am Then Towr's set still kills the problem - it has no non-empty proper subsets, and satisfies all conditions placed on S so there is no such number x... |
||
Title: Re: Vectors Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Jan 9th, 2004, 9:21am I thought that I could write out the question clearly in one sentence, but obviously not. Let a set of vectors {V1, V2, ...Vn} be 'one-summable' if |V1| + |V2 +.......+ |Vn| = 1. Excluding the empty set, a 'one-summable' set with n vectors has 2n - 1 subsets. The k vectors in each subset can be added to get a vector with a certain length m, say. That is, |v1 + v2......+......+ vk| = m (for k = 1 to n) So each 'one-summable' vector set produces 2n - 1 values for m. Let mmax = M What is Mmin? In other words, given a set of vectors such that the sum of the magnitudes of those vectors sums to 1, we need to choose a subset of those vectors which maximizes the magnitude of the sum. What is that maximum? |
||
Title: Re: Vectors Post by Eigenray on Jan 10th, 2004, 12:27am Answer: [hide]1/pi[/hide] : Hint: [hide]Sort the vectors by angle[/hide], then [hide]draw each vector starting at the tip of the previous one[/hide]. Solution: [hide]Complete to form a closed, convex polygon, so that the vectors sum to zero. Then the circumference C of this polygon will be no more than pi times its diameter D. So D >= C/pi >= 1/pi. But the diameter is precisely the sum of a subset of these vectors[/hide]. Conversely, consider [hide]n equally spaced vectors, and let n go to infinity. Then the maximal subset's sum has norm approaching 1/pi[/hide]. |
||
Title: Re: Vectors Post by Barukh on Jan 11th, 2004, 11:27am Let me repeat it again, Eigenray: absolutely brilliant :D ! Don't you agree, THUD&BLUNDER? |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |