|
||||
Title: Hardy Perennial Post by Barukh on Nov 21st, 2003, 12:17am Triangle ABC is isosceles. All the angles' measures are in degrees. Find the angle marked '?' |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by aero_guy on Nov 22nd, 2003, 12:52pm OK, I solved it, though I had to bust out the law of sines. Trickier than it initially looks. I notice now that there are similar triangles involved. The question is how would I have known that initially without going through the mess? |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by Dudidu on Nov 23rd, 2003, 10:03am Barukh hi, Could it be [hide]30[smiley=suptheta.gif][/hide]. If it does then you can read the following explanation: [hide]You can look at the attached file to see a drawing of how I got it[/hide] ;D |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by aero_guy on Nov 23rd, 2003, 2:39pm Dudidu, that is exactly what I got and exactly the way I got it. What I noticed is that the middle triangle is similar (geometrically speaking) to the one that contains it and the one to its lower left. I was wondering if there was a I way I could have found this without using the law of sines (as we both did) to find the angle. |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Nov 23rd, 2003, 3:43pm Quote:
Hint:[hide]Draw a line BD such that D lies on AC and angle ABD = 20 degrees.[/hide] |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by Barukh on Nov 24th, 2003, 5:55am on 11/23/03 at 14:39:20, aero_guy wrote:
The following question is for both you and Dudidu: how did you solve the sines equation? Quote:
I haven't found the way to follow THUDandBLUNDER's hint yet >:(, but here's another way: [hide] Consider the regular 18-gon[/hide]. |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by Lightboxes on Nov 24th, 2003, 7:47am Quote:
I'm confused... ::[hide] If the 70 degrees (both of them are) are created with two lines that intersect, then the remainding angles of the intersecting lines are as follows (I think): 360 - (70+70) = 220. Then 220 / 2 - 110. That means that the triangle to the left has thre angles now. 80+30+110?? But also (110-x) + 50 + ? = 180. That leads to ? = 50. Then the very top small triangle is 20+50+? = 180. Then ? =110. Then 110 + x + 80 = 180? Unless these are not truely lines and bend as they intersect? I think this is the case. [/hide]:: |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by aero_guy on Nov 24th, 2003, 8:10am He messed up, it should be 40 not 80. You find the 40 specifically because you know the 110 and the 30. Barukh, doesn't Dudido's picture show you? T and B, there you go, now that is as nice and simple as it should be. A little bit of mirrored symmetry and you have it. Still doesn't use similar triangles, but I guess that was a red herring. |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by Barukh on Nov 24th, 2003, 8:47am on 11/24/03 at 08:10:28, aero_guy wrote:
Well, what I've got from Dudidu's picture - after simplification - is: [hide]sin(20+x) / sin(x) = 2sin(50)[/hide]. Is there a way to solve it without guessing? |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by aero_guy on Nov 24th, 2003, 2:31pm Using the equations he has at the side gives [hide]sin(x)/sin(160-x)=sin(40)/sin(80)[/hide]. Now I bust out my old analytic geometry book (I very often use the tables at the back but almost never look at the rest) we see that sin(A+B)=sin(A)*cos(B)+cos(A)*sin(B). Combine the two and you should be able to solve explicitly for x. This is of course the ineligant way of doing it. |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by Dudidu on Nov 27th, 2003, 1:00am Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Jan 4th, 2004, 6:42am http://mathcircle.berkeley.edu/BMC4/Handouts/geoprob.pdf |
||||
Title: Re: Hardy Perennial Post by ThudanBlunder on Dec 8th, 2007, 10:17am Here is a nice animation (http://agutie.homestead.com/files/LangleyProblem.html). |
||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |