|
||||
Title: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Sep 15th, 2003, 8:49am In the diagram below, each different letter represents a different Black or White chess unit. For each letter find which unit it represents. (As usual, White is playing up the board.) |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by BNC on Sep 15th, 2003, 11:24pm Mind clarifying for me -- Black pawn and white pawn -- are they represented by different letters? |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Sep 16th, 2003, 1:19am Black and White pawns, if any, are represented by different letters. :) (I have changed the original wording from 'chess piece' to 'chess unit'.) |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by BNC on Sep 16th, 2003, 2:39am This is probably wrong (I'm a really bad chess player), but here is my guess (if, by some off-chance it's true, I'll explain my reasoning): ::[hide] A: Black knight B: White pawn C: White king D: White knight E: Black king And the black knight at D3 just made his mate move. [/hide] :: |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by wowbagger on Sep 16th, 2003, 3:38am on 09/16/03 at 02:39:23, BNC wrote:
Not that being a good chess player would be of much help... ;) Quote:
At first sight, I also came as far as your A's, B's, C and E. After taking a closer look at you proposition, I claim that the position would be illegal. That's because [hide]before Black's move (which doesn't mate by the way: cxe3/exd3) White must have made a legal move. But which? It can't have been with the King or any Pawn, and all squares where the Knight could have come from are occupied[/hide]. So I guess a little more thought is needed. Really intriguing riddle by the way, T&B! :) |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Sep 17th, 2003, 4:05am Your solution is correct, BNC. But some explanation of your method would have been nice. :) Quote:
That Sherlock Holmes book seems to be taking a long time to arrive, wowbagger. :) K on b1 to c1 is OK. Part 2: Move the A on g1 to b1. |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by wowbagger on Sep 17th, 2003, 5:13am on 09/17/03 at 04:05:05, THUDandBLUNDER wrote:
Well, I haven't ordered it yet. And I wouldn't have time to read it for the time being anyway. Quote:
Silly me! :-[ *scolds himself for not having installed a browser that does not crash using javascript with this forum, leading to cumbersome search for appropriate smiley code* |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by BNC on Sep 17th, 2003, 8:21am on 09/17/03 at 04:05:05, THUDandBLUNDER wrote:
Hehe. All-righty now! Start by counting the pieces: 7 A's, 7 B's, 1 each of C,D, and E So the 2 kings must be C,D or E. D is exculded, because 2 kins can't be next to eachother, so we know C and E are the two kings. Let's look at B now. What piece can it be. It can't be a rook, because it checkes either king, and it couldn't have just moved in, because it's blocked on line 3. It can't be a knight, because for either color, there are two night checking a king. The same is true for bishop, and ofcourse queens. Black pawns are excluded for the same reason, so we know: B=White Pawn A now. A could be either a rook or a knight. Since A=rook would put one of the kings in a check prior to the last move, A must be a knight. If A-knight and E-king are different in color, E would be in "double check", so color(E)=color(A). For similar logic as before, D must be knight too. Since color(E) is taken by A, we get color(D)=color(C) Giving colors to A,E and C,D was just a guess. I don't see a reason they can't be reveresed... |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by wowbagger on Sep 17th, 2003, 8:46am Well done, BNC. on 09/17/03 at 08:21:43, BNC wrote:
Minor nitpick: A could also be a queen, but it's the same argument as with the rook of course. Quote:
I do! ;D There are [hide]too many A's to be compatible with the B's, or in other words: Only Black can have promoted five pawns to knights[/hide]. |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by BNC on Sep 17th, 2003, 1:49pm on 09/17/03 at 08:46:47, wowbagger wrote:
Why, ofcourse... it was staring me in the face, and I didn't see it... My turn to :-[ |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Sep 18th, 2003, 7:31am How about Part 2?: Same diagram, but with the A on g1 moved to b1 |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by wowbagger on Sep 18th, 2003, 8:46am on 09/18/03 at 07:31:44, THUDandBLUNDER wrote:
Well, the reasoning for B and C/D/E still stands, but [hide]if A were a black knight, C would have to be the white king (square e1 is in double check) and we have no legal last move for white. (I hope this time I'm right.)[/hide] So A is [hide]a black rook or queen[/hide] and, consequently, C is [hide]the black king and E the white king[/hide]. The last move would have been [hide]by the black rook, capturing on f1[/hide]. Before that, [hide]a white rook could have moved from g1 to f1, so I don't see a restriction regarding the colour of piece D: it could be a black or white knight[/hide]. |
||||
Title: Re: Identify the Chess Pieces Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Sep 19th, 2003, 7:47am :[hide] That's strange! The Answer says that the capture Rxf1+ rules out D being a White knight! But, like you, I don't see how. After all, White has a legal previous move. eg, Black checked on h1 with the rook, White moved N from g3 to f1, and then Black played Rxf1+. [/hide] |
||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |