|
||
Title: Product of distances Post by Eigenray on Jun 4th, 2005, 12:28pm Given n points on the unit circle, let M denote the maximum, over all z on the unit circle, of the product of the distances from z to the other n points, i.e., M = max|z|=1 [prod] |z-zi|. What is the best lower bound for M? When is it obtained? |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Grimbal on Jun 4th, 2005, 1:17pm Intuitively, I would say the points must be equally spaced on the circle. |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Deedlit on Jun 4th, 2005, 11:22pm And it looks like [hide]the answer is 2[/hide], although I haven't come up with an argument yet. Another nifty fact is that the product of the distances from one of the vertices to the other n-1 is n. (when they're equally spaced) |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 5th, 2005, 1:04pm Deedlit is right: the minimum possible value of the maximum is [hide]2[/hide] Here is why: [hideb] Let the n points be zi i = 1 to n. We can rotate the circle so that (-1)n[prod]zi = 1. Now consider P(z) = (z-z1)(z-z2)...(z-zn) We are interested in |P(z)| for various z on the unit circle. Let wi be the nth roots of unity. Consider [sum] P(wi) Since [sum]i wik = 0, 1 [le] k [le] n-1, we have that [sum] P(wi) = 2n. Thus [sum] |P(wi)| [ge] |[sum] P(wi)| = 2n. Hence, for some i, |P(wi)| [ge] 2. It can be shown that for the n points which are equally spaced, the maximum value of |P(z)| is 2. [/hideb] |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Deedlit on Jun 5th, 2005, 8:56pm Sweet! As for proving the bound strict, [hideb] We can use the fact that sin(x) sin(c - x), with 0 <= x <= c, is maximized when x = c / 2. Assuming that the zi are equally spaced, choose z so that it bisects the arc between z1 and z2. The length |z - zi| = 2 sin (theta/2), where theta is the difference between the arguments of z and zi. So, we divide the zi into pairs for which the angles are the same. (when n is odd, there is one zi that is diametrically opposed to z.) For each such pair zm and zn, the value of |z - zm| |z - zn| is maximized by the current value of z, by the lemma from the beginning. And, of course, |z - zi| for the diametrically opposite zi as at its maximum value. So the product of all the |z - zi| is certainly maximized. All that's left is to show that the above product is 2. However, I haven't been able to come up with a slick proof of that. It does follow from the fact I mentioned earlier (that the product of the distances from one of the zi to the others is n.) [/hideb] |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 6th, 2005, 1:20am There is a simpler proof in case of the equally spaced version: [hideb] The given points are wi, the nth roots of unity. P(z) = Prod (z-wi) = zn - 1. (as they are the roots of unity) |P(z)| = |zn - 1| [le] |zn| + 1 = 2. Any root of zn + 1 = 0 will suffice to achieve the maximum of 2. [/hideb] |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Deedlit on Jun 6th, 2005, 9:51pm Yeah, that's a little slicker, although the idea of maximizing pairs of distances is pretty immediate conceptually - it just takes a little longer to write down. And now I see the same method works for the other problem: [hideb] The product of the distances to all nth roots of unity except 1 is P(z) = (zn - 1) / (z - 1) = zn-1 + zn-2 + ... + z + 1. and P(1) = 1 + 1 + ... + 1 = n. [/hideb] |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Eigenray on Jun 11th, 2005, 10:46am Nice job. It just remains to be shown that if M=2, then the points are equally spaced. |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 12th, 2005, 1:27pm Ahh.. there seemed to be something missing.. Here is a demonstration that if M=2, then the points are equally spaced: [hideb] Assume points are z1,z2,...,zn such that their product is (-1)n. Consider P(z) = (z-z1)(z-z2)...(z-zn) = zn + 1 + Q(z) We would like to show that Q(z) = 0 for all z. As before consider the values at w1, w2,...,wn the nth roots of unity. Since M = 2, We have that |P(wi)| = 2 exactly. (because [sum]|P(wi)| = 2n and M=2.) i.e |2 + Q(wi)| = 2 for each i. -- (1) We also have that [sum] Q(wi) = 0. (1) says that each Q(wi) lies on the circle of radius 2 centred at (-2,0). Sum of any points on that circle can never be zero, unless they all are zero. (as all points have non-positive x co-ordinates.) Thus we must have that Q(wi) = 0 for each i. Since Q(z) is a polynomial of degree n-1 we have that it is identically zero. [/hideb] |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Deedlit on Jun 14th, 2005, 1:12am Well done. [hideb] In fact, since [sum] P(wi) = 2n, we have immediately that P(wi) = 2 for all i if M = 2. [/hideb] |
||
Title: Re: Product of distances Post by Aryabhatta on Jun 14th, 2005, 10:17am on 06/14/05 at 01:12:33, Deedlit wrote:
Aah.. if P(wj) = xj + iyj then [sum] xj = 2n. We must also have that |xj| [le] 2. It follows that each must be 2. From which it follows that yj = 0. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |