|
||||||
Title: 16 lines Post by eN on Oct 28th, 2004, 3:01am Anyone do this one? you have to draw one line through all the lines once, theres 16 lines. eN |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by Barukh on Oct 28th, 2004, 4:29am eN, your formulation is a bit cryptic. Can you make more clear? Despite this, I tried to guess what was the question, and I doubt [hide]the solution is possible[/hide]. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by TimK on Oct 28th, 2004, 5:05am I think it's the same problem as trying to trace the figure below without picking up your pencil, and without tracing the same line twice - it's impossible. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Oct 28th, 2004, 7:05am I remember wasting hours on this one when I was a little kid. on 10/28/04 at 05:05:37, TimK wrote:
...and yet not very Hard. :) |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by John_Gaughan on Oct 28th, 2004, 7:57am on 10/28/04 at 07:05:31, THUDandBLUNDER wrote:
Of course, children have a unique way of solving problems. Some might call it naive, some might call it creative. I think that by [hide]folding the paper[/hide] one could draw a line intersecting all of those lines. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by eN on Oct 31st, 2004, 3:55am ok ok ok yeah this ones a bitch! ok you can only draw one like through these 16 lines but you cant go through the same once twice i.e. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by Icarus on Oct 31st, 2004, 5:56am A basic and well-known result in graph-theory shows that by ordinary interpretation, this is impossible. The picture shows 6 regions (the 5 rectangles + the outside). These regions have 5,5,4,5,4 and 9 "sides" respectively. Each time the curve enters a region and leaves, it removes two sides from those still needing intersected. Because the sides are intersected in pairs, every region - except those the curve begins and ends in - must have an even number of sides for every side to be intersected. Thus, any puzzle like this can have only two regions with an odd number of sides if it is to be solvable. This picture has 4 regions and so cannot be solved. That said, whoever gave you the puzzle will almost certainly tell you there IS a solution. The trick is, he or she is NOT giving the instructions the "ordinary" interpretation. A minor change in your graph above will "intersect" the missing side, and also close the curve into a loop. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by Grimbal on Nov 2nd, 2004, 3:41am It depends what you mean by "going through a line" ;D |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Nov 2nd, 2004, 3:49am on 10/28/04 at 03:01:22, eN wrote:
...and also on what he means by once? ::) |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by eN on Nov 2nd, 2004, 6:09am im pretty sure it can be done just need some clever way :D and no you cant go through the line like "Grimble" did and yes just one line one try simple as that. eN` |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by TimK on Nov 2nd, 2004, 6:46am Let's see it, Icarus |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by Grimbal on Nov 2nd, 2004, 8:07am Hm... either there is no solution or there is a catch. Do you mind telling us where the 16 lines are, exactly? And can we assume that the thickness of the additional line is conceptually zero and does not, for instance, exceed the size of the whole figure? And can we cross from one rectange to the other through the meeting point of 3 lines without couning as "crossing a line"? |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Nov 2nd, 2004, 8:13am Quote:
Each side of a rectangle has been counted as a separate line. Thus the perimeter consists of nine lines. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by Grimbal on Nov 2nd, 2004, 8:15am on 11/02/04 at 08:13:01, THUDandBLUNDER wrote:
That is your interpretation. Is it also eN's? |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by Icarus on Nov 3rd, 2004, 8:01pm on 11/02/04 at 06:09:46, eN wrote:
Sorry, but as my argument above clearly shows - there is NO way unless you twist the interpretation as Grimbal has done. on 11/02/04 at 06:46:47, TimK wrote:
You already have. Grimbal's solution is the traditional one for this puzzle. (I have come across this one many times. It even exists elsewhere on this site, I believe.) on 11/02/04 at 08:15:29, Grimbal wrote:
It's the interpretation he himself uses in reply #5. |
||||||
Title: Re: 16 lines Post by TimK on Nov 4th, 2004, 4:47am Ah, I didn't notice that the segment at the top goes along the line. That's pretty slick. |
||||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |