|
||
Title: Perfect Square Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Nov 5th, 2003, 5:43am Find the shaded area. |
||
Title: Re: Squares Post by towr on Nov 5th, 2003, 5:51am My first intuition is to assign each side a variable, and solve it using gaussian elimination fluff ;) [e]actually, there isn't a unique solution, since any integral multiple of the collection of squares would have the same properties. But I suppose we can choose the smallest possible value[/e] |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by visitor on Nov 5th, 2003, 10:32am [hide]The square can be solved in two parts. First, the upper left hand corner forms a self-contained rectangle that is easily solved to give the mystery square a size of 38, when the smallest square (call it z) is 1. The rectangle then has dimensions of 94 by 111. Plug that into the whole image. If I assign x to the smallest of the remaining boxes and y to the box right above it, I end up with 41x+y=111z. and 4y-11x=94z. And because it's a square, you can also equate 26x+y+94z=3x+2y+111z. So z=1, x=2, and y=29. And the mystery square retains its size of 38.[/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Dec 10th, 2003, 5:09am Well done, visitor. Now that you have the hang of it, what's the area of the large square in the top left-hand corner? |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by Barukh on Dec 10th, 2003, 3:10pm Is the whole thing still a square? |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Dec 10th, 2003, 5:55pm Quote:
Yes, just as in the first puzzle. |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by Barukh on Dec 11th, 2003, 11:43am OK, I think I know the answer: [smiley=blacksquare.gif][hide]50[/hide][smiley=blacksquare.gif]. The solution will follow... |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by Barukh on Dec 11th, 2003, 2:25pm Here's the solution: [smiley=blacksquare.gif][hide] First, I made an assumption – based on the relative sizes of squares – that Z < A < B < C < D. I began by choosing Z, A, C as “independent” quantities. Then, we have T = C+Z, N=2C+Z, M = 3C+2Z etc. Closing on R, I got the following relation: 4A = 2C+Z, which showed that Z must be even. So, the smallest possible assignment is Z=2, A=3, C=5. Next, I turned to the right-bottom part of the big square. Since S = 2*O+B = R+N+C-O, I get 3*O+B = 6C+3Z+3A, that is, B is a multiple of 3. This eliminates the aforementioned assignment for A and C, so I considered the next possibility A=4, C=7. Then, B=6, O=18, P=24, S=42, and the size of the big square is 112. Finally, 2J+D = P+B = 30, and K+G = 2J+3D = 46, so D=8, J=11. The requirements of the problem (each square being of unique size) are fulfilled, and also are the assumptions. The rest is really straightforward. [smiley=blacksquare.gif][/hide] |
||
Title: Re: Perfect Square Post by THUDandBLUNDER on Dec 11th, 2003, 7:45pm Well done, Barukh. :o With all due respect, this puzzle is obviously not as difficult as I had assumed and moderators may feel free to move it where they think fit. But finding such squares from scratch is difficult. See, for example, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PerfectSquareDissection.html |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |