|
||||
Title: People Rankings and their Applications Post by amichail on Jun 5th, 2005, 12:56am Strangely, publicly available people rankings are not that common. But we have for example this: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/mostcited.html With rankings such as these, we can build interesting applications. For example, when searching through usenet postings, we might rank the results in a way that takes into account how successful the poster is -- as might be determined by the number of citations in the research literature say. I am actually thinking of building a ranking of open source developers. Such a ranking might be determined by seeing how successful their applications have been (e.g., # downloads). Of course, if an application is built by many developers, we have to address the credit assignment problem. Namely, who is primarily responsible for the success of the application? We might examine the CVS repository to see who wrote what. In any case, once we have this ranking of open source developers, we could then consider various applications: * usenet search that takes into account how good of a developer the poster is * code search that returns code fragments written by particularly good developers Do you think building a ranking of open source developers would be worthwhile? Do you think the applications mentioned would be compelling? |
||||
Title: Re: People Rankings and their Applications Post by towr on Jun 5th, 2005, 9:18am Doesn't sourceforge already have a ranking of the open source devellopers on their site? |
||||
Title: Re: People Rankings and their Applications Post by amichail on Jun 5th, 2005, 2:59pm on 06/05/05 at 09:18:09, towr wrote:
I can't seem to find these rankings on sourceforge. Do you know the URL(s)? Also, I'm looking for a ranking that is not based on peer review but is objectively computed in an automated way. |
||||
Title: Re: People Rankings and their Applications Post by towr on Jun 6th, 2005, 1:51am on 06/05/05 at 14:59:42, amichail wrote:
Quote:
|
||||
Title: Re: People Rankings and their Applications Post by amichail on Jun 6th, 2005, 2:31am on 06/06/05 at 01:51:04, towr wrote:
I think it might be interesting to see what most popular software is really like. I suspect that the code quality of popular word processors (e.g., TeXmacs, LyX, AbiWord) would be quite high. However, the code quality of popular chat clients might not be very good. I think it has something to do with the size/complexity of the application and the number of developers. So perhaps the measure would combine popularity with some of these characteristics to identify likely talented programmers. |
||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |