|
||
Title: An Exponential Curiosity Post by Sir Col on Jan 29th, 2005, 10:19am Clearly x2/6 = x1/3, or does it? As x2/6 = (x1/6)2 = (x2)1/6... (-1)1/3 = -1, (1[pm][smiley=i.gif][surd]3)/2 [three values] ((-1)1/6)2 = -1, (1[pm][smiley=i.gif][surd]3)/2 However, ((-1)2)1/6 = -1, (1[pm][smiley=i.gif][surd]3)/2, but also 1, -(1[pm][smiley=i.gif][surd]3)/2 [six values] Consider the two graphs below: (i) y = x1/3, (ii) y = (x2)1/6. Spot the difference? ;) [e]Thanks for the correction, rmsgrey.[/e] |
||
Title: Re: An Exponential Curiosity Post by rmsgrey on Jan 29th, 2005, 2:12pm on 01/29/05 at 10:19:29, Sir Col wrote:
I get [pm]i6=-1 and that: ((-1)1/6)2=-1 (and 2 complex values)=(-1)1/3 |
||
Title: Re: An Exponential Curiosity Post by Icarus on Jan 29th, 2005, 9:02pm Impudent monkey indeed. You know very well that exponentiation cannot be extended to domains completely encircling 0 in the complex plane. Yet that is exactly what you attempt here! |
||
Title: Re: An Exponential Curiosity Post by Sir Col on Jan 30th, 2005, 2:15am Cheeky by name, cheeky by nature... But what about the real graphs? Why is the graph of y = (x2)1/6 different to y = x1/3, when (x2)1/6 = x2/6 = x1/3? Does that mean that 2/6 is not equal to 1/3? ::) |
||
Title: Re: An Exponential Curiosity Post by Barukh on Jan 30th, 2005, 6:26am on 01/30/05 at 02:15:15, Sir Col wrote:
Why complicate the question? Consider two functions: (i) y = x; (ii) y = [sqrt](x2) |
||
Title: Re: An Exponential Curiosity Post by Icarus on Jan 30th, 2005, 11:24am More to the point, that (xa)b = xab rule comes with an "x [ge] 0" qualifier. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |