|
||
Title: Wasted Space Post by Noke Lieu on Feb 19th, 2009, 6:05pm (seems like an obvious question, but couldn't find somethign like it) Make a net of 1x2x3 rectangular prism. Bound that net with a rectangle. Which net wastes the most space compared to its rectangle, which the least? (to help clarify, an example with tetrahedron nets) |
||
Title: Re: Wasted Space Post by towr on Feb 22nd, 2009, 8:50am So by "net", do you mean an unfolded surface of those objects? I'm not familiar with the term (but obviously once has to be the first time). |
||
Title: Re: Wasted Space Post by rmsgrey on Feb 22nd, 2009, 8:58am on 02/22/09 at 08:50:30, towr wrote:
Yes, "net" is a standard term for a planar shape that can be folded to form the surface of a 3D object. |
||
Title: Re: Wasted Space Post by Grimbal on Feb 22nd, 2009, 1:57pm Something like this? |
||
Title: Re: Wasted Space Post by Noke Lieu on Feb 22nd, 2009, 9:30pm yes. and no- nets (from what I understand...) require 1 polygon per face... nice solution though. Been struggling with showing why what I think is the answer is the answer... but that's why I left it in easy. |
||
Title: Re: Wasted Space Post by ThudanBlunder on Feb 23rd, 2009, 7:26am on 02/22/09 at 13:57:50, Grimbal wrote:
I thought it would be obvious the answer to this self-descriptive problem is that nets of zero (or imaginary) dimensions waste the least space. :P If anybody gets awkward and insists on 3 dimensions, we can always compactify them while they are not looking. Welcome to the world of dimensional dementia. |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |