|
||||
Title: soccer tournament Post by black_death on May 6th, 2008, 12:06am In a soccer tournament n teams play against one another exactly once. The win fetches 3 points, draw 1 each and loss 0. After all the matches were played, it was noticed that the top team had unique number of maximum points and unique least number of wins (that is all other teams win more matches than the top team). What can be the minimum possible value of n ? (n>1) |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by rmsgrey on May 6th, 2008, 9:45am on 05/06/08 at 00:06:14, black_death wrote:
1 |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by ThudanBlunder on May 6th, 2008, 11:33am on 05/06/08 at 09:45:43, rmsgrey wrote:
How do they play 'exactly once'? :P |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by Qaster Qof Qeverything Q42 on May 6th, 2008, 1:05pm [hide] 2 [/hide] |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by black_death on May 6th, 2008, 6:57pm i think the question should be clarified further .... minimum number of wins mean that all the team win more matches than the top team |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by rmsgrey on May 7th, 2008, 5:10am on 05/06/08 at 11:33:51, ThudanBlunder wrote:
They play each and every other team exactly once each |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by FiBsTeR on May 7th, 2008, 2:40pm Why not zero teams? I say that each team plays each other exactly once, for, if not, there would exist some team that played another team less than or greater than once, which contradicts the fact that there are no teams. I say that the top team has the maximum number of points and the least number of wins, for, if not, there would exist either a team with more points or a team with less wins, which contradicts the fact that there are no teams. Thus having zero teams fulfills all the requirements, and there clearly can't be a negative number of teams, so zero is the minimum. :) |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by ThudanBlunder on May 7th, 2008, 2:53pm on 05/07/08 at 14:40:09, FiBsTeR wrote:
Why not? I don't think, and I'm sure rmsgrey will back me up here, this has been ruled out in the problem statement. ::) And who said the number of teams must be real? For example, there might be i teams. In which case we would have http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/frakcu.gifhttp://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/frakn.gifhttp://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/frakr.gifhttp://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/frake.gifhttp://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/fraka.gifhttp://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/frakcl.gif Tournament. |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by black_death on May 7th, 2008, 6:47pm he he guys ..... ok the number of teams are greater than 1 ;D |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by Qaster Qof Qeverything Q42 on May 8th, 2008, 4:10am on 05/06/08 at 13:05:50, Qaster Qof Qeverything Q42 wrote:
ahem |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by rmsgrey on May 8th, 2008, 5:28am 2 teams is impossible. With 1 match, either it's a draw, in which case there's no unique winning team, or one team wins, in which case the unique winning team has more wins than some other team... |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by ThudanBlunder on May 9th, 2008, 9:47am But getting real, let top team win w times. Then top team has (n-1) - w draws. Now if top team has k wins less than another team then top team must have at least 3k+1 more draws than the other team in order to end up with more points. More draws requires more matches, which require more teams in the tournament. So assume minimum is achieved when top team has just one less win than every other team. Then top team must draw at least 4 more games than every other team, in order to end up with more points. And some other teams have drawn at least one game (eg. with top team). So n - 1 - w > 4 n > w + 5 .........................................(1) And if all except top team score w+1 wins then total number of wins = total number of losses = n(w+1) - 1 And top team has n - 1 - w draws. So considering total number of games we get 2n(w+1) - 2 + 2(n-1-w) http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/le.gif n(n-1) or n2 - (2w+5)n + 2w + 4 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/geqslant.gif 0 (n - 1)(n - 2w - 4) http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/geqslant.gif 0 And n = 1 gives us rsmgrey's deep observation. :) Otherwise n http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/geqslant.gif 2w + 4 Putting w = 1 gives n http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/geqslant.gif 6 But n > 6 by (1) Finally, putting w = 2 gives n http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/geqslant.gif 8 Team 1: W - W - D - D - D - D - D (11 points) Team 2: W - W - W - D - L - L - L (10 points) Team 3: W - W - W - D - L - L - L (10 points) Team 4: W - W - W - D - L - L - L (10 points) Team 5: W - W - W - D - L - L - L (10 points) Team 6: W - W - W - D - L - L - L (10 points) Team 7: W - W - W - L - L - L - L ( 9 points) Team 8: W - W - W - L - L - L - L ( 9 points) It's nice to get one all to myself. And I'm glad I managed to finish it before Hippo arrived. :) |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by black_death on May 9th, 2008, 11:57am Perfect TB :D |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by Hippo on May 9th, 2008, 12:10pm on 05/09/08 at 09:47:16, ThudanBlunder wrote:
Except the number of points of last two teams on 05/09/08 at 09:47:16, ThudanBlunder wrote:
:) I have resign to write answers (and even to solve) such an amount of riddles ... at least few first days |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by ThudanBlunder on May 9th, 2008, 12:37pm on 05/09/08 at 12:10:56, Hippo wrote:
Thanks. Now corrected. on 05/09/08 at 11:57:03, black_death wrote:
There is a small step missing. I haven't yet proved that n=7, w=1 is not possible (and it doesn't seem to be - it leaves too many draws). |
||||
Title: Re: soccer tournament Post by ThudanBlunder on May 10th, 2008, 6:38pm on 05/09/08 at 12:37:40, ThudanBlunder wrote:
OK, I think I have it. The top team draws n - 1 - w games and they draw at least 4 more games than every other team. So no other team can draw more than n - 5 - w games. So the total number of draws (times 2) must be less than or equal to (n - 1)(n - 5 - w) + (n - 1 - w) = n(n - 5 - w) + 4 And total number of draws (times 2) = total number of games (times 2) - total number of wins - total number of losses So we have n(n - 1) - 2n(w + 1) + 2 http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/leqslant.gif n(n - 5 - w) + 4 And this simplifies to (2 - w)n http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/leqslant.gif 2 And we know that n > w + 5 or n = 1 When n = 1, w = 0, trivially. And n > w + 5 leads to (2 - w)(w + 5) < 2 and so w http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/YaBBImages/symbols/geqslant.gif 2 QED |
||||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |