wu :: forums
        (http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wwu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
      

        riddles >> easy >> Arab Sheikh Camels
        
(Message started by: johnP on Jul 24th, 2002, 1:36am)
Title: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by johnP on Jul 24th, 2002, 1:36am
The wise man probably told them to switch camels. After all, the last camel will win the fortune for its OWNER, so if one brother finishes first with the camel he doesn't own, the camel he owns would have finished last.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by paul pigg on Jul 24th, 2002, 3:31pm
obviously. :)  it's one of those things where the wording of the riddle is the key.  
--paul
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by The Steve on Jul 24th, 2002, 11:54pm
The wise man tells them that he knows that in fact their rich relative is actually deeply in debt, and that the winner would inherit the huge debts.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Mixster on Jul 25th, 2002, 12:40am
I like the first answer, but how about this one...

The person tells them that their father has already passed, and now it won't matter who finishes last (unless someone else verifies the results).  Thoughts?

-Mixster
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Zachary Turner on Jul 26th, 2002, 12:06am
He probably did not actually tell them to switch camels.  Because it said they immediately raced towards the finish line.  They didn't have time to switch camels.  What he probably told them is that were ALREADY riding the other brother's camel.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Daishi on Jul 27th, 2002, 12:41am
But it specified that they lept on the camels (note that it doesn't say "their" camels) and raced to the finish line.

I'm pretty sure he told them to switch.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Scott on Jul 29th, 2002, 4:30pm
Couldn't the wise man have said,
"He who finishes last, finishes first."

I thought I have heard that somewhere before.  Therefore the one who would eventually finish last, will finish first.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Brion on Jul 30th, 2002, 2:49pm
What if the wise man were to tell the sons that their father only used this race as a ploy to friviously spend all their inheritance?  Or that he only used this race as a diversionary tactic to give his inheritance to another?

Cheers!

Brion
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Shaun on Jul 31st, 2002, 3:15pm
The wise man tells the brothers to swap camels, this is the best answer so far.  However, once the first brother crosses the finish line, why would the second brother cross, effectively handing his brother the fortune?  If he wanted to be bitter about it, he'd send his brothers camel a hundred miles in the opposite direction.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Paul Slocum on Aug 1st, 2002, 3:26pm
I think a wise man would tell them to agree to split the money before ending the race.  It seems like the best solution for everyone.   :)

-Paul
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by bd on Aug 5th, 2002, 1:50am
The wise man told them that they have already crossed the line....therefore the first one to go back over the line, is/was the last one to cross the line.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Patrick on Aug 7th, 2002, 9:04am
According to my eleven year old daugher, it was a rich old wise man and he told the brothers that he would give the one who's camel crossed the finish line first, twice as much as the father's fortune.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Mongolian_Beef on Aug 13th, 2002, 8:48pm
"QUICK! STEAL YOUR BROTHER'S CAMEL RIGHT NOW AND BEAT HIM TO THE FINISH LINE!"
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Eric van Gyzen on Aug 23rd, 2002, 3:37pm

on 07/29/02 at 16:30:41, Scott wrote:
Couldn't the wise man have said,
"He who finishes last, finishes first."

I thought I have heard that somewhere before.  Therefore the one who would eventually finish last, will finish first.


"But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first."  Matthew 19:30

Maybe the wise man was Jesus.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by jeremiahsmith on Aug 23rd, 2002, 9:46pm
Yeah. Jesus strikes me as the kind of guy who'd be good at riddles.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by anon on Oct 19th, 2002, 6:55am
"His two sons will ride their camels in a race, and whichever camel crosses the finish line last will win the fortune for its owner."

The wise old man just reminded them what the race was all about. That was, who's camel comes in last, WINS the fortune for its owner. Neither wanted their camels to get the fortune, so they raced towards the finish line.

It was a tricky test by their father.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by TimMann on Oct 19th, 2002, 4:36pm
Hmm, is anon assuming the camel gets to keep the fortune? I guess these are emancipated camels that own themselves.  ;D
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by tymalynj on Dec 9th, 2002, 6:12pm
It seems that the camel who crosses the finish line last still crosses last and still wins, according to the father. I would agree that the idea was that somehow the brothers rode the others camel over the finish line, therefore ensuring that his own camel was the last of the two to cross.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Some random dude on Dec 13th, 2002, 9:35pm
If we assume that both brothers are equally obdurate in their desire, they will stay out in the desert until one of the camels dies.  As such, the that camel will never cross the finish line, and the living camel may only cross first, not last.  Therefore, if they want to wait until the bitter end, then neither will win the contest.

That might not spur them on to immediately gallop for the finish line, but it would at least make them have to agree to not let a camel die......

That's the best I can do outside of the 'camel swap' option.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Guest on Feb 8th, 2003, 8:12am

The wise man tells them to witch Camels and whoever finishes first wins the money.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Guest on Feb 8th, 2003, 8:13am

The wise man tells them to SWITCH Camels and whoever finishes first wins the money.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Derek Meadows on Feb 25th, 2003, 2:37pm
There cannot be a LAST to finish if there is not a FIRST to finish.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by bashar haddad on May 25th, 2003, 11:00pm
Couldnt they have just ran backwords, and whoever finishes it backwords wins becuase the other finishes first. soprry sounds confusing.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by smiley on Apr 19th, 2004, 2:50pm
It seems to me that the father wanted the sons to learn to work together.  I think crossing the finish line at the same time, thereby in theory they would both get the inheritence (albeit split in half).

Just my thinking...     ::)
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by gurl from the pacific on Sep 7th, 2004, 9:00pm
He tells them something; then the brothers leap onto the camels and charge toward the finish line.

:-[

they either switched or leaped onto BOTH of the camels together because the passage doesnt say: the brothers leap onto THEIR camels, it says: the brothers  leap onto THE camels.  
or he could have told them the camels water stores (in the humps)had run out and to be quick before they died.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by proccy on Oct 1st, 2004, 2:31pm
Presumably this race is happening in the desert.  The first person to cross the line in the sand could then erase it?
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Corby Gordita on Oct 22nd, 2004, 8:22pm
The wise man told them to walk their camel over the finish line.That way they are first and the camel is last.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by coolnfundu on Oct 24th, 2004, 5:17am
I think the wise man told them that they were already riding each others camels ... thats the best answer ... or maybe not  ::)
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Magician on Dec 27th, 2004, 1:12pm
I have a few answers...

1. He told them to switch. After all, they needed ADVICE for figuring out how to end this. The old man wouldn't tell them their father is blah, blah, whatever. Of course, he gave them advice to END it, which was switching camels to ensure the win.

2. What if the money was already won? The last person to cross the line wins... Well, what if someone had already crossed it and the father had already given the fortune away? What if the father had crossed it last? Look at the wording of how 'last' is used.

3. Whoever previously said one could cross it then erase the line, that sounds good. Using my version of 'last' up above, they would be the last to ever cross it.

4. What if they had to finish the cross in the sand? Last one to "cross" it, so they needed to make another line in the sand over the father's.

I had another one, but now I can't remember. Anyways, hope my thoughts helped.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by watcher on Jan 15th, 2005, 8:17pm
Hi all,
  It's my first time in this forum.
  I liked the idea that they switched camels, but as was discussed about that, the brother coming in last can always take the camel in the opposite direction and ensure that his brother's camel will never cross the finish line, hence rendering an incomplete solution.
  Also, finishing the line together ans sharing the fortune is also probably not possible because the old sheikh intended to give the fortune onlt to one of his 2 sons (as far as I understand).
 I have a different idea (probably useful) to contribute. I checked the meaning of 'last' on, for example, the Merriam-Webster dictionary site (since it was in italics). As a noun, it means "a form (as of metal or plastic) which is shaped like the human foot and over which a shoe is shaped or repaired". Could this be a clue?
1. Probably there is a last (maybe the old sheikh's fortune in the form of a golden last?) at the finish line. Obviously ( to me), the camel which crosses this finish line first would have crossed it first, and its owner can capture it first so that the other camel would be unable to cross it. Of course, they then ride their own camels.
2. Probably a drawing in the sand at the finish line (with a judge) in the form of a last? The wise man probably told them to cross it as soon as possible before another sand storm buries it, in case it has not already done so: the brothers are anxious if either of them will even get it and race towards the finish line to cross it, if it still exists. Here also, the brothers should ride their own camels.
   Any suggestions appreciated. :)
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Qriqet on Jan 28th, 2005, 3:21pm
If I am correct, the riddle never states that the brothers are racing against each other.  It does state that the brothers will race their CAMELS to the finish line however.  This might have a loophole in it but this is what I first came up with.  If one of the sons races his camel to the finish line (while he is on his camel) then the man will finish first because he completely crosses the finish line first.  I know this does leave out the relevance of the son who finishes last.  

THINK ABOUT THIS...But the wiseman probably told them that BOTH of them could win if they merely rode their horses to the finish line because it never states that the brother that finishes last gets the prize.  It just states that the brother who's camel finishes last wins the prize.  Therefor, leaving both of them eligible.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Mallory on Feb 1st, 2005, 3:26pm
LoL, he told them to shoot their cammels and go home. :P
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Nitin Nidhi on Apr 4th, 2005, 4:13am
I don't assume that there's any silly trick of words. There are three cases in the puzzle:

1. Camel 1 ends last
2. Camel 2 ends last
3. Both of them cross together.

Since both the brothers want to maximize there amount they wouldn't allow there camels to cross their camel before the other one, so cases 1 and 2 are improbable. So we are left with case 3, in which case the money should ideally be equally divided among the two heirs in the absence of any other justifiable consequence. So the two brothers MUST compromise to win the maximum achievable amount and so case 3 is the best solution.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by towr on Apr 4th, 2005, 4:27am
But if they agree to cross simulataneously, what would stop one brother from suddenly holding back, so the other crosses first and he second, and thus winning the total?

It makes more sense to turn it into a real race and just switch camels.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by The Godfather on Apr 4th, 2005, 7:00am
If you kill the other person's camel then bring it to the finish line first, your camel could cross last.

Perhaps the wise man said, "Ride towards the finish line and try to kill your brother and his camel."
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Avo on Apr 4th, 2005, 8:20am

on 04/04/05 at 07:00:02, The Godfather wrote:
If you kill the other person's camel then bring it to the finish line first, your camel could cross last.

Perhaps the wise man said, "Ride towards the finish line and try to kill your brother and his camel."


Then why would they "hurry toward the finish line" other than that they were tired of the race?  I like this answer, but somehow it's lacking....
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by towr on Apr 4th, 2005, 8:31am

on 04/04/05 at 08:20:27, Avo wrote:
Then why would they "hurry toward the finish line" other than that they were tired of the race?
Well, you have to admit. If one brother decides to try and kill the other, the other might be likely to flee to safety (home). Making the persuer second, and winner.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Avo on Apr 4th, 2005, 8:35am
Hmmm I see my own point (I am The Godfather revealed!) ;D
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by rmsgrey on Apr 4th, 2005, 9:23am
I recently told a version of this riddle to someone - with horses rather than camels, and stating that the wise man said only two words to resolve the issue.

When at length I revealed the answer ([hide]Swap horses[/hide]), you could see the light come on in my friend's face.

I feel this is one of those riddles that epitomises riddleness - the answer is almost impossible to come up with through reasoning, but when you hear the answer, it (almost) immediately makes sense, and you know it's the right answer. For me, it's that "hard to find, easy to recognise" property that distinguishes great riddles.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Baakalor on Apr 17th, 2005, 7:45pm
I have to agree that the wise man told them to swap camels.  I just got nearly the identical riddle with the addition  that "the wise man only said two words prior to the brothers leaping on the camels and racing towards the finish line."

Swap camels makes the most sense.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by newbie on Apr 30th, 2005, 8:13pm
the wise man told the sons that if they did not hurry home the king would just die and the third in line would get the riches
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Venkatesh_Babu on Jun 5th, 2005, 11:20pm
Hi guys,

how about this solution,
since both the brother  dont want to reach first  
the wise man can suggest  the two brothers to cross the finish line at the same time so that both can get the  property ( share) , other wise they will be simply wondering aimlessly for days, neither willing to cross the finish line.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Sanj on Jun 6th, 2005, 1:44pm
I like the idea tha NEITHER brother owned their camels.

Therefore if you cross the line last, your share will go to the owner of the camel. So you have to finish first to get your share.

The wiseman must have told them they don't own the camel or asked if they own their camels.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by zymra on Jun 6th, 2005, 2:33pm
The reason they like them thar Camels is cuz they ain't never gettin flat tire.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by JiNbOtAk on Jun 7th, 2005, 3:09am
The wise man told the two guys that their father is getting married that very day. He sent them out for the 'race' becos he knew they'd go against the marriage. They raced back to prevent their father's marriage, since upon his death, the riches would go to the new young wife, and they'd just have two, very exhausted camel.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by BeerBoyee on Jun 19th, 2005, 2:47am
Well, the switch camels sounds pretty good and that would be the only answer that works if that "two word" limit was included in the riddle, but since in the wording of THIS puzzle doesnt state that a good solution is that the wise man said he will kill the one who finishes last so that their father would be forced to will his fortune to the winner.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Snake on Jul 2nd, 2005, 9:04am
Killing him? Do you really think he should get rewarded for bein greedy enough t' kill his brother?
The swap camels one don't make sense either.
MY guess cross together would be two words(even tho that ain't the case here) and it makes sense enough to happen.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by towr on Jul 3rd, 2005, 7:35am

on 07/02/05 at 09:04:42, Snake wrote:
The swap camels one don't make sense either.
Why would you say that doesn't make sense?
If they each ride the other camel, then by crossing the lines first, their camel crosses last. So they can win by racing.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by $Sister on Jul 4th, 2005, 7:17am
:P I agree that they swapped camels but what if one brother says that there wasn't a wise and says that the camel he's riding is his
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Cyberniv on Jul 20th, 2005, 7:56am
Each brother sells a half share of his camel to his brother then whichever camel crosses last will result in a half share of the riches to each brother.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Grimbal on Jul 22nd, 2005, 5:54am
One possible outcome is that the old man told them to "kill yours".  One brother understood and killed his camel, smiling at his brother.  The other, first surprised, then did the same.  Then they started to try to drag the other's camel towards the finish line.

Interestingly, the line in question was on the other side of a desert, thousands of miles away.  Each brother could carry only 100 kg of camel at a time.  They had to eat one kg of meat to walk 100 km.  They could leave pieces of camel anywhere in the desert.  It ended up real messy.  Still today, you can hear stories of people who saw the one of the other of the brothers, lost in the desert, carrying pieces of camel around.  The father, who only pretended to be sick, remarried and lived happy ever after.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Steve Banerjee on Aug 4th, 2005, 6:30am
The only possible answer to the Arab chief's Camels is that the brothers try to get on to the other's camel and reide as fast as possible to the finish line. As it is the camel who wins the reward for the owner so the camel who is driven first to the finish line will be the loser.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by coolnfundu on Aug 26th, 2005, 2:34am
not yours ...

thats another thing wise man could have told them ...
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Lozboz on Jun 20th, 2006, 4:57am

on 09/07/04 at 21:00:51, gurl from the pacific wrote:
He tells them something; then the brothers leap onto the camels and charge toward the finish line.

:-[

they either switched or leaped onto BOTH of the camels together because the passage doesnt say: the brothers leap onto THEIR camels, it says: the brothers  leap onto THE camels.  
or he could have told them the camels water stores (in the humps)had run out and to be quick before they died.


Did you know that it's not water in the camel's hump, it's fat and how would a person know if a camel's water was running out anyway?

Also, it doesn't really matter who passes the test because the loser brother can kill the winner before he inherits everything. (I'm sorry it's such a dark outcome.)
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Lozboz on Jun 20th, 2006, 6:18am
Perhaps the father was testing them, later he'd change his decree and give it to the one to finish first because he wouldn't wan't a greedy son to inherit his wealth. (The son to finish first must be generous and understand that his and his brother's lives aren't worth destroying for the money).
It isn't unusual for a fake decree to be made in order to discern the worthiest just look at Azdak's change of decree in The Caucasian Chalk Circle by Bertolt Brecht.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by thehunter on Jul 17th, 2006, 4:41pm
I agree with the "switching camels" answer but isn't the person who wins money often the loser?
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Roy on Jul 20th, 2006, 7:07pm
I was just looking at this thread and saw a guest said something about it could have been that the water storage in the humps had run out. I didn't see a correction, but the humps actually store food, not water. But yes, the switching camels thing is the correct answer.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Lozboz on Jul 20th, 2006, 11:52pm
Roy wrote: I was just looking at this thread and saw a guest said something about it could have been that the water storage in the humps had run out. I didn't see a correction, but the humps actually store food, not water.

Didn't see a correction!!! Hello? Am I invisible?
Nice to know people care what I write!  :(
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Roy on Jul 21st, 2006, 12:38am
Sorry, i've been feeling like i'll collapse lately. Goodbye and goodnight................................
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Grimbal on Jul 21st, 2006, 12:45am

on 07/20/06 at 19:07:26, Roy wrote:
I was just looking at this thread and saw a guest said something about it could have been that the water storage in the humps had run out. I didn't see a correction, but the humps actually store food, not water. But yes, the switching camels thing is the correct answer.

In some sense it also stores water.
In fact, it stores fat.  But burning fat releases CO2 and H2O.  The CO2 is breathed out, the H2O remains as water.  In fact, due to the fact that the oxygen makes most of the weight of water and that it comes from the air, the weight of water obtained from burning fat is larger than the weight of fat burned in the first place.  So, storing fat not only stores energy, but is also a more efficient way to carry water than to actually carry water.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by towr on Jul 21st, 2006, 1:35am

on 07/21/06 at 00:45:48, Grimbal wrote:
So, storing fat not only stores energy, but is also a more efficient way to carry water than to actually carry water.
Except that due to the environment, it's a useless way to store water.
Turning the fat into water requires oxygen, which in turn requires breathing; and due to the arid conditions they're in, they loose more water due to evaporation in the lungs than metabolizing the fat yields.
http://www.biol.lu.se/zoofysiol/Djurartiklar/Kamel.html
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by aravindc on Nov 14th, 2006, 4:28am
the wise man asked them to race to the finish line first and claim that the camel they were riding was the other siblings'.

now the father has to believe the son who got there first. since he had no reason to get there first if not the camel were not his. the other son coming second will always say the camel he was riding was his!!
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Lozboz on Nov 15th, 2006, 1:13am
I kno I shouldn't get into a debate here about camel phisiology although I'd love to but I wanted to add the link here to an essay my friend wrote. She does a type of biology and that kinda thing so I believe she is a pretty good authority on the topi of water storage (etc.) in camels.

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=37564492&blogID=118701534&Mytoken=B910B908-DDB2-4016-851F2B33DF1E8C7F31167881

On a different note it is a good point that aravindc had a good point, the father would have to trust the word of his sons, but perhaps the camels had distinctive markings so that it was easy to tell between the two.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by suithink on Dec 27th, 2006, 9:36pm
For me ...the correct answer is ONLY swapping...here it is why?
1. Father proposition is there shd be a race...(this condition need to be satisfied..so all other thinking is out of context)..but the problem is that the sons are not able to find how to race with the given condition.
2.The problem gives the clue to solution stating that 'the camel (NOT the sons!) who finishes last is the winner',this means that camel can be used by other owner also..(The camels are not common )ones but has a 'owner'.
Looking the solution from this context..swapping is the  logical solution which satisfies the criteria say the race,camel,owner ,last...
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Zatanna on Aug 11th, 2007, 6:22pm
I heard this riddle when it involved two gentleman gamblers. Since they were GENTLEMEN, and men of HONOR, they had to finnish the race, no matter how stupid the rules were; so they rode each other's horse. (Camel)
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by robfarries on Aug 2nd, 2008, 11:36am
The wise man reminded them that they are having a RACE.  Therefore, the first person to cross ENDS the race.  The winner is the last person to cross because after he finishes, the race is OVER.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by rmsgrey on Aug 3rd, 2008, 4:46am

on 08/02/08 at 11:36:56, robfarries wrote:
The wise man reminded them that they are having a RACE.  Therefore, the first person to cross ENDS the race.  The winner is the last person to cross because after he finishes, the race is OVER.

An interesting argument, but less satisfying than the traditional answer that allows the brother who owns the slower camel to inherit.

Besides, in many races, the race continues until the last competitor crosses the line - allowing them to at least set a time for completion - in situations where competitors can drop out during the course of the race, completing the course rather than dropping out carries some honour.
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Icestone on Jun 2nd, 2009, 1:00am
The wise man said,

" Hey, aren't the two of you the Sheikh brothers? When is your dad going to pay me back his debts?
To date, the outstanding amount is 100mil inclusive of interests."

Debt > Fortune and hence the one who inherits will turn bankrupt.  ;D
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by Smokeykurt on Jun 8th, 2009, 12:27pm
Ok guys, the answer to this one is so incredibly simple I'm surprised NO ONE has thought of this:


[hide]Ok, i think the key to this puzzle revolves around ethnicity[/hide]


and let me tell you why

// blatently offensive "solution" removed by moderator. --SMQ

i know this is an out there answer, but it is by far the best, and when i say by far, i mean in the most bestest most amazingistnissit way possible.



this is like the best site ever though....and i mean that in all seriousness   :-*
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by berserk on Oct 28th, 2009, 6:17am
The wise man asks dem to exchange der camels!! so d one who reaches first wins as his camel reaches last.....
Title: Re: Arab Sheikh Camels
Post by berserk on Oct 28th, 2009, 6:18am
The wise man asks dem to exchange der camels!! so d one who reaches first wins as his camel reaches last.....


Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board