|
||
Title: np complete problem Post by kirru on Nov 15th, 2012, 9:00am Ram and Shyam have been asked to show that a certain problem PI is NP-complete. Ram shows a polynomial time reduction from the 3-SAT problem to Pi and Shyam shows a polynomial time reduction from PI to 3-SAT. Which of the following can be inferred from these reductions? A. PI is NP-hard but not NP-complete B. PI is in NP, but is not NP-complete C. Pi is NP-complete D. PI is neither NP-hard, nor in NP |
||
Title: Re: np complete problem Post by towr on Nov 23rd, 2012, 8:00am I'll go with C |
||
Title: Re: np complete problem Post by kirru on Nov 24th, 2012, 7:01am Dear Towr, how can we say that it is in NP? |
||
Title: Re: np complete problem Post by towr on Nov 24th, 2012, 1:00pm Because you can solve it in polynomial time on a non-deterministic machine via reduction to 3-SAT |
||
Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4! Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board |