Author |
Topic: Body or mind? (Read 295 times) |
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender: 
Posts: 6991
|
 |
Body or mind?
« on: Apr 3rd, 2018, 5:26am » |
 Quote  Modify
|
?
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #1 on: Apr 4th, 2018, 10:06am » |
Quote Modify
|
Depend on whether you're hungry for sustenance or knowledge. 
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 6991
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #2 on: Apr 4th, 2018, 12:58pm » |
Quote Modify
|
So what You are trying to say is that it is a matter of time. Every nanosecond is a moment in time - once it has elapsed. If you consider the present as a moment, rather than the present time, that is to say, as the current nanosecond, having in mind precision and punctuality, tell me: can you be hungry for sustenance or knowledge in this nanosecond which, apparently, allows you to be alive and exist, or both sustenance and knowledge are out of reach, considering little time at our disposal? If life is defined as the present time, life makes more sense; however, w/o the past, the present means nothing regarding life, which fully exists, as such, in the present nanosecond, being devoured by the Langoliers when day becomes yesterday, and yet, always traveling to the future, having temporal paradox: our memories and imagination, in mind, with the future ensuring continuity of spacetime, inviting both hunger for sustenance and knowledge. But, all this is academic. My answer ensures a union, like that of spacetime, where one cannot exist w/o the other.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 4th, 2018, 1:55pm by alien2 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #3 on: Apr 5th, 2018, 6:10am » |
Quote Modify
|
And sometimes you are hungry to know where is the nearest pizzeria.
BTW: "It is a matter of time"? I am sure that if you manage to create matter out of time or just prove an equivalence between time and matter you are set for the next Nobel prize. They might even take back an already awarded prize to give it to you.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 5th, 2018, 6:15am by Grimbal » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 6991
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #4 on: Apr 5th, 2018, 8:17am » |
Quote Modify
|
That may well be. However, time is not what it used to be, that is to say, time loops are constantly resetting, thus the loop starts again, and although you retain the memories from the previous loop, not all is well in Switzerland, forwhy you might be a bigamist in the next emanation and your wife might leave you. So, considering time loops, for all we know, the Big Bang happens over and over again endlessly after, say, 15 billion years. So we are talking about possible futures and alternative timelines likewise memories that, although interchangeable, show certain similarities, and so do not represent the truth and nothing but the truth, thus no ones testimony can be admitted in any civil court of law. So, in a sense, lie IS the truth, your truth that, from an another observer's point of view, whose consciousness might be an independent variable, is colored by the personalities of witnesses that present them from their OWN point of view. So, maybe we were communicating on Wu forums countless times before, but that means only one thing: we did NOT communicate at all, forwhy there is no anchor, continuity of our correspondence that has no integrity to preserve from the point of view that is compatible with the truth continuum. So, if you say a lie, it is not necessarily so, and it might be, as a matter of a fact, the ultimate fluctuating truth.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 5th, 2018, 8:22am by alien2 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 6991
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #5 on: Apr 5th, 2018, 8:45am » |
Quote Modify
|
“One reads poetry. I myself sing it. Is the Word more important than the Voice? Do we gaze at poetry w/o uttering a sound? Does poetry belong to eyes more than it does to ears? When one hears a poem through his eyes, the Word is close again, when a reader's and poet's heart will become one and then travel back through time like two tachyon particles to witness the birth of the universe.” — I happen to be a poet as well
Depending on whether you're hungry for sustenance or knowledge, every nanosecond is a moment in time - once it has elapsed. If you consider the present as a moment, rather than the present time, that is to say, as the current nanosecond, having in mind precision and punctuality (or machines for that matter), tell me: can you be hungry for sustenance or knowledge in this nanosecond which, apparently, allows you to be alive and exist, or both sustenance and knowledge are out of reach, considering little time at our disposal and limited organic memories stored in different, interconnected brain regions? If life is defined as the present time, life makes more sense; however, w/o the past, the present, with our recent, daily impressions to consider likewise long-term memories (talking about temporal incursions and penetrating the past), means nothing regarding life which, fully exists, as such, in the present nanosecond, with the following question in mind: “What becomes of day when it becomes yesterday?” and yet, while time travel happens all the time into the future (say, at the rate of one second per second), considering the following temporal paradox: our memories and imagination, where with the former we penetrate the past, while with the latter we realize ourselves through technocracy likewise technological progress, with the future ensuring the continuity of spacetime, inviting both hunger for sustenance and knowledge. But, all this is academic. ‘Our’ perception, from a certain (human) observer’s point of view, ensures a union, like that of spacetime, where one cannot exist w/o the other.
Albeit there is equivalence between time and matter, mayhap there is more to it, having in mind a thought-provoking premise of creating matter out of time. To even consider this seemingly impossible task, time is not necessarily what it seems, that is to say, time loops, if there are any, are constantly resetting, thus the loop starts again; and although you retain the memories from the previous loop, there are discrepancies in the next emanation. Having time loops in mind, for all we know, the Big Bang happens over and over again endlessly after, say, 15 billion years. So, we are talking about possible futures and alternative timelines likewise memories that, although interchangeable, show certain similarities, and so do not represent the truth and nothing but the truth, thus no one’s testimony can be admitted in any civil court of law. So, in a sense, lie IS the truth, your truth that is, from an another observer's point of view, whose consciousness might be an independent variable, colored by the personalities of witnesses that present them from their OWN point of view. So, maybe we were communicating on the Naked Scientists website countless of times before, and perhaps I wasn’t clueless back then, even though my username IS ‘clueless’, but that means one thing only: ‘we’ did NOT communicate at all, not really, forwhy ‘you’ and ‘me’ are susceptible to time loops and, there is no anchor, continuity of our correspondence that has no integrity to preserve from the point of view that is compatible with the truth continuum. So, if you tell a lie, it is not necessarily so, forwhy it might be, as a matter of a fact, the ultimate fluctuating truth, based on changes that concern the biggest picture: space, the final frontier.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 24th, 2018, 2:18am by alien2 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 6991
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #6 on: Apr 5th, 2018, 9:59am » |
Quote Modify
|
And, what IS time, as WE know it? having in mind a challenging idea of creating matter out of time. The flow of sand in an hourglass represents the present as being between the past and the future. But, is ‘the upper bulb’ getting emptier and emptier, suggesting that ‘stuff’ is slowly disappearing in the past, with moments, that are but temporal grains of the sand of time, being irretrievably lost, or are ‘they’ empty at first but, once they, constantly flowing, reach the present from the past, which proves that traveling to the future is possible, memories, that are accumulated in the present, are imprinted on them, when these grains of sand become substances meant for storing memory.
But, now we have but a paradox, forwhy these grains of sand flow into the future; so, is the memory of time, stored in its fabric, actually in the past, or is it in the future? Is the future, or at least an aspect of it, equivalent of the past forwhy time flows linearly in one direction: into the future, and so its memories MUST be stored deeper, and deeper into the future, forwhy the passage of time is not reversible from linear time point of view.
I call this theory the cosmological arrow of time paradox which, points in the direction of the universe's expansion, where continuum relies on memories thus remembers its entire existence deeper, and deeper into the future, forwhy w/o memories, that are not indigenous exclusively to organisms like humans (need I remind you that computers have memory too), the mechanism of spacetime cannot be; otherwise, it'd be a meaningless, an entirely chaotic system w/o not any order whatsoever, forwhy order depends on memories in order to preserve its integrity otherwise — there isn’t any (God does not play dice. We do.). Universe is not ‘brainless’ and w/o memories. Its richness grows like an organism where there are often changes because of the evolution or, mayhap, unfortunate devolution. Time is often referred to as a fourth dimension, along with three spatial dimensions. But now, we just might be aware that, dynamics of the passage of time is necessary, considering a formula of all creation, likewise essential for the creation of matter and anti-matter, and an integral part in a dynamic model of accelerated expansion of the universe.
Furthermore, since the present is the mother of all the past, w/o which history cannot exist and is but a myth, forwhy the present, as we perceive it, once belonged to each and every passed nanosecond/day, one ought to conclude, or at least consider, that the present sends two type of temporal waves, with one of them being tachyons, back into to the past, with tachyons suggesting the presence of anti-time which, in turn, happens to be the past, that is to say, the spaceanti-time continuum, recalling that anti-time has a relationship to time analogous to the relationship that antimatter has to normal matter. So, the fabric of the past is significantly different than the fabric of the present, where spacetime, compatible more with matter, creates and gives birth, from the present, to anti-matter in the past and the past itself, where anti-matter is more likely to exist in the past, by utilizing tachyons which are, following the same line of thought, more associated with anti-matter than matter. In a sense, if you consider the present as an aircraft, where its diesel engine propels it through air by creating smog, time engine, on the other hand, produces tachyons that propel it — into the future. And since tachyons have but linear travel, though in the opposite direction of the present which strives to travel into the future in order not to compromise linear time, one ought to conclude, or at least consider, that the past, the Bing Bang especially, is yet to occur considering tachyon particles likewise anti-time temporal waves, having in mind multidimensionality of the above temporal paradox.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 10th, 2018, 7:54am by alien2 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 6991
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #7 on: Apr 6th, 2018, 7:17am » |
Quote Modify
|
From this I conclude, that the present travels in two directions: into the future, by utilizing temporal waves I call futuryons, and also into the past, by sending temporal waves tachyons. So, since the Big Bang is yet to occur, likewise the Big Crunch, with the cosmological arrow of time then reversing as gravity pulls everything back into a Big Crunch, we ought to conclude that there are two presents, that is to say, the present and the anti-present, which suggest two seemingly entirely opposite timelines, + and -. So, the beginning of the spacetime and the spaceanti-time continuum was not the Big Bang, rather the beginning of the present and anti-present, each belonging to a different universe: two parallel universes that comprise the multiverse, and in a sense, between one another, like the upper and lower bulb, where the lower one is being filled with time, and the upper with anti-time, that is to say, the bulbs could be considered as parallel universes, where the ‘upper’ bulb is NOT getting emptier. One might say that present and anti-present are traveling at an identical constant speed, possibly that of light, seemingly away from one another, with the present traveling in one direction: into the future, and the anti-present traveling in the opposite direction: into the past.
Considering the initial conditions in the early universe/s, what then, I ask, created spacetime and spaceanti-time displaced into two parallel universes, as a matter of a fact, that were born at the exact moment in time and anti-time? What was the catalyst likewise a creator of futuryons and tachyons? Who sends these temporal waves, seemingly in complete opposition? That'd be, my cyber friends, the true center of the multiverse, consisting of the beginning of both parallel universes, where one has time and the other anti-time. So, the Big Bang is not Alpha, as in the beginning likewise the center of the universe, rather, just like the Big Crunch, the middle of time/anti-time; in other words, the Big Bang and the Big crunch will one day collide — long after the Big Bang and the Big Crunch occur at the exact same moment in time likewise anti-time, when the explosion of the Big Bang will reverse anti-time (belonging to the past) into time, with analogy being either Loschmidt's paradox or simply rechargeable battery as its current flow is reversed when plugged into an electrical socket with alternating current. At the very same moment in time (anti-time, likewise), sort to speak, time that considers the present (which flows into the future) will become anti-time reversed by the Big Crunch, thus futuryons will become tachyons (and vice-versa in spaceanti-time), similarly to converting negative polarity to positive, and positive to a negative. And while the reversed timelines now traveling 'towards' one another collide, THEN it'll be the end of the multiverse, forwhy futuryons are harmless when travelling in the opposite direction of tachyons, otherwise differences, usually, attract one another. But, when they travel towards one another, that is to say, when the present that reaches the Big Crunch and the anti-present that reaches the Big Bang reverse their roles likewise direction of travel, when the present and the anti-present finally meet (oh no!), annihilation will occur, similar to ‘rendezvous’ of matter and antimatter, when energy will be released mostly in the form of gamma radiation, a type of radiation with a very short wavelength that passes through most solid objects. Emphasis is on 'short' wavelength forwhy the multiverse, when it reaches its end and final stage, comprised of what once used to be the, seemingly, infinite universe and anti-universe, will exhibit similarities to two very small — Singularities, occupying the very same space as parallel universes. However, the gamma radiation, that will be able to pass through both Singularities, will stimulate both which, just might produce, just like before (in the ‘true’ beginning), casual loop, where independent variable can only be — — — God.
And now, if you'll excuse me, I think I will accept that Nobel prize.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 10th, 2018, 7:54am by alien2 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Nobody
Newbie
Posts: 10
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #8 on: Apr 9th, 2018, 8:41am » |
Quote Modify
|
By the way, do you know who won the 1948 piece Nobel prize?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
alien2
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 6991
|
|
Re: Body or mind?
« Reply #9 on: Apr 9th, 2018, 10:26am » |
Quote Modify
|
It was a long time ago. I can't seem to remember.
|
| « Last Edit: Apr 9th, 2018, 10:26am by alien2 » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print