Author |
Topic: test functions (Read 3263 times) |
|
Jen
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
test functions
« on: Apr 15th, 2010, 12:55pm » |
Quote Modify
|
we know that any real valued function f can be written as f= (f+) _ (f_) , where f+ and f_ are two non-negative real valued functions. Now I wanna prove that we have the same result for test functions in D (the space of test functions), that is: any real valued function f in D can be written in the form: f= (f+) _ (f_) , but here we have f+ and f_ are both non-negative real valued functions in D. Moreover: Is there an example for a real valued function f in D for which f= (f+) _ (f_) but f+ and f_ are not test functions? this is my first time I use this forum and I hope someone will help me Thank you
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Obob
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #1 on: Apr 15th, 2010, 3:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Apr 15th, 2010, 12:55pm, Jen wrote:Is there an example for a real valued function f in D for which f= (f+) _ (f_) but f+ and f_ are not test functions? |
| Yes. Just let f(x) be a bump function around the origin (so f is smooth, positive, compactly supported, and f(x) = 1 for x close to 0), and let h = xf(x). The functions h+ and h- are clearly not smooth at x=0. For the other question, here's a hint. It's enough to find a positive test function g such that f+g is positive everywhere.
|
« Last Edit: Apr 15th, 2010, 4:13pm by Obob » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jen
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #2 on: Apr 15th, 2010, 9:43pm » |
Quote Modify
|
ok, I'm thinking of a function g to be g=( the above bump function).((max value of f)+1) - f then f+g= ( the above bump function).((max value of f) +1) which is a test function and positive : clearly g is positive, right !! (of course we extend the bump function so it has the same support as f has) but I'm not sure if it is a test function?
|
« Last Edit: Apr 15th, 2010, 9:47pm by Jen » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Obob
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #3 on: Apr 16th, 2010, 4:15am » |
Quote Modify
|
The bump function should be 1 on the support of f. Of course f+g is a test function.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jen
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #4 on: Apr 16th, 2010, 4:46am » |
Quote Modify
|
so: our g would be g(x)= (maxvalue of f+1).b(x) - f(x) where b(x)=1 : if x in support of f, and 0 otherwise and this function will do the jop?! why we cannot use exp(- x^-2) supported over [-1,1] instead of 1 in part 1 and 2 above? also why the argument in 2 doesn't contradicts our example in 1?
|
« Last Edit: Apr 16th, 2010, 4:49am by Jen » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Obob
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #5 on: Apr 16th, 2010, 6:15am » |
Quote Modify
|
No, b(x) isn't 1 if x is in the support of f and 0 otherwise. b has to be smooth. So b is 1 if x is in the support of f, it is smooth, compactly supported, and positive. This doesn't uniquely specify b. Actually constructing such a function b is a whole other exercise.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jen
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #6 on: Apr 16th, 2010, 6:19am » |
Quote Modify
|
why the argument in 2 doesn't contradicts our example in 1?
|
« Last Edit: Apr 16th, 2010, 7:04am by Jen » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Obob
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 489
|
|
Re: test functions
« Reply #7 on: Apr 16th, 2010, 9:01am » |
Quote Modify
|
What argument? What you asked is if we can write any test function f as g-h, where g and h are positive test functions, and indeed we can. This doesn't mean you can always take g and h to be the function g = f+ = max(f,0) and h = f- = -min(f,0): f+ and f- typically aren't smooth.
|
« Last Edit: Apr 16th, 2010, 9:01am by Obob » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|