Author |
Topic: Stuck on a radical (Read 1050 times) |
|
TruthlessHero
Newbie




Gender: 
Posts: 40
|
 |
Stuck on a radical
« on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Book says it's -1/6, but I keep getting either -4/3 or -9/3. Any advice? I've done dozens of similar problems and gotten them all right... Err yeah - the equation = 0... Not sure how I forgot to put that in the image
|
« Last Edit: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:06pm by TruthlessHero » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
pex
Uberpuzzler
    

Gender: 
Posts: 880
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #1 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:46pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Are you sure you copied everything correctly? As it stands, you have 2*sqrt(-x+1) - sqrt(2x-5) = 0. I can see neither of the solutions you mention as valid, but I find x = 3/2 as the only solution.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
    
 Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender: 
Posts: 13730
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #2 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 2:50pm » |
Quote Modify
|
(2x - 5) isn't real for x < 2.5 and 2 (-x+1) isn't real for x > 1 So to end up as zero, I'd say they both need to have an imaginary part (because they can't be real at the same time) and so 1 < x < 2.5 Which means, I can't find myself in any of the three suggestions. [edit]I find pex's 3/2 quite agreeable[/edit]
|
« Last Edit: Dec 3rd, 2007, 12:59am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
FiBsTeR
Senior Riddler
   

Gender: 
Posts: 581
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #3 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 3:24pm » |
Quote Modify
|
You might want to make sure that you 1) copied the problem right, 2) copied the answer to the problem correctly from the book, and 3) copied the answer from the correct problem. pex's solution is the one for this particular problem: 2sqrt(-x+1) - sqrt(2x-5) = 0 2sqrt(-x+1) = sqrt(2x-5) 4(-x+1) = 2x-5 -4x + 4 = 2x-5 6x = 9 x = 3/2 Inserting the solution back to the problem tells us that this is a (and the only) solution.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
TruthlessHero
Newbie




Gender: 
Posts: 40
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #4 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 4:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Believe me, I've checked the question and answer at least a half dozen times, and I still see the problem, as stated, with a solution of -1/6. But, I hadn't really looked for a way to disprove it at the time of the posting ( I merely assumed the book was right. ). So I give a collective "thank you" to you three. I will be showing my professor the typo next class.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Sameer
Uberpuzzler
    
 Pie = pi * e
Gender: 
Posts: 1261
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #5 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:12pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I think if you have sqrt(2x+5) in there, the answer will be -1/6...
|
|
IP Logged |
"Obvious" is the most dangerous word in mathematics. --Bell, Eric Temple
Proof is an idol before which the mathematician tortures himself. Sir Arthur Eddington, quoted in Bridges to Infinity
|
|
|
TruthlessHero
Newbie




Gender: 
Posts: 40
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #6 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:24pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Yeah, I noticed that too, and my teacher agrees (emailed her) that that must be the typo.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
   

Gender: 
Posts: 500
|
 |
Re: Stuck on a radical
« Reply #7 on: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:28pm » |
Quote Modify
|
The problem solver made a mistake and solved this problem instead: 2 sqrt(-x + 1) - sqrt(2 x + 5) whose solution is x = -1/6. edit: as Sameer pointed out. You'll discover that there are lots of errors in basic algebra books like this one: over confidence on the part of the problem solver and the fact that this level is generally routine and boring leads to these sort of errors, and it is not true that authors write all the problems or check the solutions either. In fact, a publisher may at the last minute hire a proofreader to read the book when there simply isn't enough time to do it.
|
« Last Edit: Dec 2nd, 2007, 7:47pm by Michael Dagg » |
IP Logged |
Regards, Michael Dagg
|
|
|
|