wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3) »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 28th, 2024, 2:44pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: Grimbal, towr, Eigenray, Icarus, william wu, SMQ)
   (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  (Read 10706 times)
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
*****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1291
(2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« on: Nov 8th, 2006, 2:09pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Prove that (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3) is a rational number.
 
Hint 1: I got this problem out of a mathematical olympiad book that I've been reading. In this chapter, we want to use the following trick: a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 3abc if a+b+c = 0. Maybe there are other ways to solve this problem though.
 
Hint 2: Let x = (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3), and then you have an equation with three terms which add to zero. Apply the identity from the previous hint. Now we are getting close.
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2006, 2:09pm by william wu » IP Logged


[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #1 on: Nov 8th, 2006, 3:09pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Are you sure you didn't make any typos? Because I get quite irrational results..
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
*****





   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1291
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #2 on: Nov 8th, 2006, 6:09pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Hmm, well there are real cube roots and complex cube roots. If you take the purely real cube roots of each term, and then add them, the result is rational. Maybe this should have been stipulated in the problem. Admittedly I've never quite known under what conditions it's understood that the strictly real roots are being considered.
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2006, 6:09pm by william wu » IP Logged


[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #3 on: Nov 8th, 2006, 6:25pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Without going into details, if you were to ask me if that was rational or irrational, I would have guessed rational, for much the same reason that (2+i)1/3 + (2-i)1/3 is real.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #4 on: Nov 8th, 2006, 7:54pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

If x = a+b, then
x3 = (3ab)x + (a3+b3).
(Conversely, if
x3 - px - q = 0
then we may find a,b, such that
3ab = p, a3+b3=q.
This is Cardano's method for solving the cubic equation.)
 
Letting w = e2 pi i/3 denote a cube root of unity, notice that the numbers
a+b,  wa + w2b,  and w2a + wb
all satisfy the same cubic equation,
x3 = 3abx + (a3+b3),
and in general the solutions to the equation
x3 = 3wiabx + (a3+b3)
are given by
x = wja + wi-jb,  j=0,1,2.
 
There are 9 possible values of
(2+sqrt(5))1/3 + (2-sqrt(5))1/3,
depending on which cube roots you take, and they each satisfy one of 3 cubic equations.  But only one of these values, namely 1, is real, let alone rational.
IP Logged
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #5 on: Nov 8th, 2006, 10:11pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 8th, 2006, 7:54pm, Eigenray wrote:
If x = a+b, then
x3 = (3ab)x + (a3+b3).

Yes! This immediately gives a method of constructing the radical equal to any prescribed integer.
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #6 on: Nov 9th, 2006, 12:16pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

HA! Fun.
 
Consider  ((1 + sqrt(5))/2)^3 = 2 + sqrt(5).  
 
Can you take it from there?
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Ken_Wiley
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 22
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #7 on: Nov 9th, 2006, 10:11pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Apparently 2-sqrt(5)=((1-sqrt(5))/2)^3 also.  I guess your point is to replace those two original terms with the new forms, after taking cube roots, and end up with 1 which, is rational of course.
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #8 on: Nov 10th, 2006, 3:26pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 9th, 2006, 10:11pm, Ken_Wiley wrote:
I guess your point is to replace those two original terms with the new forms, after taking cube roots, and end up with 1 which, is rational of course.

 
Well yes. If you are only interesting in the rationals (other any other reals) then  
that's all you need and hence, QED.
« Last Edit: Nov 10th, 2006, 3:51pm by Michael Dagg » IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Ken_Wiley
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 22
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #9 on: Nov 10th, 2006, 5:58pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I have a book about identities and formulas but I don't find these in it. There are many other formulats with the sqr root of 5 in them.  I put that formula in to my TI calculator and it simplified.  Really that confuses me because when I put in the original equation it gave me a complex number.  
 
How did you know that formula?
 
 
 
IP Logged
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 500
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #10 on: Nov 10th, 2006, 6:32pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

It is just one of those things you remember and I 'll bet
you'll remember it now!
 
By the way, what complex value did your calculator display?
IP Logged

Regards,
Michael Dagg
Barukh
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 2276
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #11 on: Nov 10th, 2006, 7:15pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 10th, 2006, 5:58pm, Ken_Wiley wrote:
How did you know that formula?

The formula can be derived as follows: Write
 
[a+b sqrt(5)]3 = 2 + sqrt(5)
 
Expanding and equating the rational and irrational parts, we get:
 
a3 + 15ab2 = 2,
3a2b + 5b3 = 1.
 
Multiply the second equation by 2, subtract the first and divide through b3; denoting a/b = z, we get:
 
z3 - 6z2 + 15z -10 = 0
 
Note that the sum of the coefficients of this cubic equals 0, implying z = 1.
 
IP Logged
Ken_Wiley
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 22
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #12 on: Nov 10th, 2006, 7:39pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

I am more than slightly lost with what you did there.
 
Seems that what you did worked up backwards. With the z equation you get the two equations and then the one. But I think I see what you might mean by a formula.
 
The way I did it was to expand it out and it simplifed very easy.
 
I guess the best question to ask is if these formulas are known then why would a problem like this appear?  Is it just to test students about their knowledge or what?  Someone slap me but when I look back at the original problem and read its details I must assume that it is complex but along comes a formula that makes it simple, but in between there are complex discussions and at one point the number 1 is mentioned but then the statment says "let alone rational" which means to mean No.
 
 
 
 
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #13 on: Nov 13th, 2006, 1:14am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

If you have a puzzle with sqrt(5) in it, suspect fibonacci (or at least phi=(1+sqrt(5))/2) is involved. (Unfortunately when I saw this puzzle I didn't set through on that thought)
 
Of course it's more general than that; you can find the rational value for e.g.
(99 + 70 sqrt(2))^(1/3) + ( 99 - 70 sqrt(2))^(1/3)
in a similar way.
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Ken_Wiley
Newbie
*





   


Gender: male
Posts: 22
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #14 on: Nov 13th, 2006, 9:15am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Thanks for the tip. I am learning to see the humor an apparent puzzles within puzzles in between the lines on this forum. I wondered if there was a sqrt(2) analogy to sqrt(5) and you mentioned it!
 
When I first saw ((1+sqrt(5))/2 I thought it looked like something you'd get from the quadratic formula and it is for the equation  x^2 - x - 1.
 
« Last Edit: Nov 13th, 2006, 9:21am by Ken_Wiley » IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #15 on: Nov 13th, 2006, 9:58am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 13th, 2006, 9:15am, Ken_Wiley wrote:
I wondered if there was a sqrt(2) analogy to sqrt(5) and you mentioned it!
I think it works for every squareroot. But after 5 the most popular choice is 2 Tongue
 
Quote:
When I first saw ((1+sqrt(5))/2 I thought it looked like something you'd get from the quadratic formula and it is for the equation  x^2 - x - 1.
Yup, the connection with fibonacci comes from this as well.
The recurrence for the fibonacci sequence is f(0)=0, f(1)=1, f(n) = f(n-1)+f(n-2)  
And you find the closed form by solving  
rn= rn-1+ rn-2.  
Dividing by rn-2 you get the quadratic  
r2= r1 + 1, or r2 - r1 - 1 = 0 ,  
Taking the two solutions  
phi = ((1+sqrt(5))/2 and phi' = ((1-sqrt(5))/2
you have f(n) = (phin - phi'n )/sqrt(5)
 
(It works in a similar way for other second order recurrences)
« Last Edit: Nov 13th, 2006, 10:02am by towr » IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #16 on: Nov 13th, 2006, 5:35pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 10th, 2006, 7:39pm, Ken_Wiley wrote:
I am more than slightly lost with what you did there.
 
Seems that what you did worked up backwards. With the z equation you get the two equations and then the one. But I think I see what you might mean by a formula.
 
The way I did it was to expand it out and it simplifed very easy.

It's easy to check that ([1+sqrt(5)]/2)3 = 2 + sqrt(5), but the problem is, if we don't already know this, how can we compute [2 + sqrt(5)]1/3?  We suppose that the result is of the form a + b sqrt(5), i.e.,
 
(*)  [a+b sqrt(5)]3 = 2 + sqrt(5)
 
and we try to find a and b, if they exist (and they might not: for example, (3+sqrt(5))1/3 is not in the form a + b sqrt(5) for any rational a,b).  Assuming a,b are rational, we can expand out (*) and compare the rational and "irrational" parts, giving two equations in the two variables a,b.  We can then deduce the homogeneous equation
 
a3 + 15ab2 = 2 [3a2b + 5b3],
 
which, dividing through by b3, and letting z=a/b, becomes
 
(**) z3 - 6z2 + 15z - 10 = 0.
 
By inspection, this has the rational root z=1, and since
 
z3 - 6z2 + 15z - 10 = (z-1)(z2 - 5z + 10),
 
we can see this is the only rational root.  That is, if (*) is satisfied, then (**) must be also, and since z=a/b is rational, this means z=1, i.e., a=b.  Thus we need to solve
 
a3 + 15aa2 = 2,
3a2b + 5a3 = 1,
 
which is satisfied when a=b=1/2.  (The fact that a + b sqrt(5) happens to be the golden ratio is just a coincidence; for example
[38 + 17 sqrt(5)]1/3 + [38 - 17 sqrt(5)]1/3 = [2 + sqrt(5)] + [2 - sqrt(5)] = 4.)
 
Quote:
I guess the best question to ask is if these formulas are known then why would a problem like this appear?

Like any problem, the solution is only "known" once you've either worked out, or been shown, how to do it.  So one way to solve this problem is to (figure out how to) explicitly compute [2+sqrt(5)]1/3, and then show that the sum in question is 1.
 
 
To clarify my previous post:
 
Let x = u + v, where u3 = r + s sqrt(d),  v3 = r - s sqrt(d).
 
(So that for the present problem, r=2, s=1, d=5).  Then from the identity
(u+v)3 = u3 + v3 + 3uv(u+v)
we obtain
x3 = 2r + 3(r2-s2d)1/3x.
 
Assume that r,s,d are rational, and d>0 is not a square.  Then by taking real cube roots u,v, we have that x=u+v and the coefficient uv above are both real.  In general the polynomial
 
f(x) = x3 + px + q = x3 - 3(r2-s2d)1/3x - 2r
 
has only one real root, since its discriminant is
 
D = -4p3 - 27q2 = -4*[-33(r2 - s2d)] - 27[-2r]2 = -108d s2 < 0.
 
(Unless s=0, in which case the roots will be 2r1/3, -r1/3, -r1/3, the first of which corresponds to taking u=v real.)
 
So given r,s, the value of x (obtained by taking real roots u,v) is the (unique) real root of the above polynomial f.  It is rational iff f has a rational root, and since f is monic, the only possible rational roots are integer divisors of q = -2r.  In the case r=2, s=1, d=5, we get f(x) = x3 + 3x - 4 = 0, which does have the rational root x=1.
 
 
Now, to compare the two methods.  Clearly, if we can find rational a,b such that [r + s sqrt(d)]1/3 = a + b sqrt(d), then x = 2a will also be rational (this is where we use d is not a square).
 
On the other hand, suppose x = u+v = 2a is rational, with u,v as above, with r,s rational.  Now, any two numbers with sum 2a can be written in the form a +/- b sqrt(d) for some number b.  So for some b,
u = [r + s sqrt(d)]1/3 = a + b sqrt(d)
v = [r - s sqrt(d)]1/3 = a - b sqrt(d).
Cubing both sides, and taking sums and differences gives
2r = 2[a3 + 3dab2]
2s sqrt(d) = 2[3a2b + db3] sqrt(d).
Since a,r,d are rational, the first equation shows b2 is rational (unless x=r=a=0, which is boring).  Using this fact in the second equation then shows b itself is rational.  That is, if x as above is rational, then we can find a cube root of r + s sqrt(d) of the form a + b sqrt(d), with a,b, rational.  (This isn't particularly obvious.  For example, this says that if u,v are distinct real numbers with u3, v3, and u+v all rational, then u and v must both be rational.)
 
So x is rational iff r=0 or [r + s sqrt(d)] is a cube in Q(sqrt(d)).  And x is rational iff the cubic
f(x) = x3 - 3(r2-ds2)1/3x - 2r
has a rational root.
 
 
Problems like this are related to Cardano's method.  For example, suppose we want to solve the equation
x3 + px + q = x3 + 3x - 4 = 0.
Using Cardano's method, we get
x = u + v = (-q/2 + sqrt(-D/108))1/3 + (-q/2 - sqrt(-D/108))1/3
 = (2+sqrt(5))1/3 + (2-sqrt(5))1/3,
where the cube roots are chosen so that uv = -p/3 = -1.  But it's not at all obvious from this "closed form" expression that one of the roots is rational, whereas we can see that x=1 is a solution to the original equation.
 
The situation is even worse when the polynomial has 3 real roots.  For example, the solutions to
x3 - 7x + 6 = 0
are "given" by
x = [-3 + 10i/(3sqrt(3))]1/3 + [-3 - 10i/(3sqrt(3))]1/3,
where the cube roots are chosen to have product 7/3.  Now it's not clear that any roots are rational, but we can easily see from the original equation that they are 1,2, and -3.
 
[If we have an irreducible cubic equation with 3 real roots, however, Cardano's method is in a sense the best we can do, because it's a theorem that then none of the roots can be expressed in terms of real radicals.  That is, the roots are not contained in any root extension consisting of subfields of R.]
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: (2 + sqrt(5))^(1/3) + (2 - sqrt(5))^(1/3)  
« Reply #17 on: Nov 14th, 2006, 12:05am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Nov 13th, 2006, 5:35pm, Eigenray wrote:
(The fact that a + b sqrt(5) happens to be the golden ratio is just a coincidence
Except that we're dealing with a puzzle, not a random problem ;)
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board