wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - guitar string »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 28th, 2024, 2:46am

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   putnam exam (pure math)
(Moderators: Grimbal, Icarus, Eigenray, william wu, towr, SMQ)
   guitar string
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: guitar string  (Read 1744 times)
Larissa_Preedy
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 14
guitar string  
« on: Jun 8th, 2005, 12:11am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A guitar string makes a higher note the tighter the tension in the string. Suppose
 
    * the guitar has length L;
    * the string tension is T; and
    * the mass of the string is M kg per meter.  
 
what is the order of magnitude of the expression for the frequency of vibration of the string?
 
 
i can get it down to 1/s2..but i need 1/s
 
L = metres
T = kgm/s2
M = kg/m
 
T/ML3
 
gives me 1/s2
 
how do i get that down to 1/s?
 
or am i going on the wrong tracK?
 
IP Logged
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #1 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 12:56am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Don't forget that you're working with a sinusoidal wave, so when you derive the wave velocity you would obtain an expression involving a square root (v=sqrt(T/r), where r is mass per unit).
 
Then using the result that the fundamental frequency of a vibrating string is given by v/(2L), we get f=sqrt(T/r)/(2L), where T is tension (kgm/s2), r is mass per unit length (kg/m) and L is length of string (m).
 
U(T/r)=(kgm/s2)/(kg/m))=m2/s2
U(sqrt(T/r))=m/s
So U(f)=((m/s)/m)=1/s.
 
I hope that helps.
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
Larissa_Preedy
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 14
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #2 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 1:35am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

hm, i dnt think it's meant to be so complex...
 
i think we're only meant to use the items given :S
 
IP Logged
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
*****




impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae

   
WWW

Gender: male
Posts: 1825
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #3 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 1:48am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Sadly the word "fundamental" rarely means simple in mathematics and physics, rather it means of significant importance.
 
Simply put, the fundamental frequency of a vibrating string is of the order sqrt(T/M)/L, using the symbolic conventions you were given.
IP Logged

mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
Larissa_Preedy
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 14
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #4 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 2:00am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

that's my probelm though, i cannot have  
 
sqrts  
 
otherwise i would have put
 
sqrt (T/ML^3)
 
but i can't do that Sad
 
that's why i'm stuck
 
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #5 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 2:56am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

What is meant by "order of magnitude of the expression"?
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Larissa_Preedy
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 14
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #6 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 3:01am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

it's dimensional analysis.
 
i have to basically work out a formula from the given 3 identities, and get the answer in hertz..
 
L = m
T = kgm/s2  
M = kg/m
 
i got to "cancel" the things down, to end up with 1/s or hertz
 
as i said, T/ML3 gives 1/s2
 
This is done by
 
kgm/s2*m/kg*m-2
 
the kg's cancel, the m's cancel, leaving 1/s2
 
however, i need to cancel down to get 1/s
 
the only method i can think off is square rooting the final answer, but that is not allowed Sad
« Last Edit: Jun 8th, 2005, 3:01am by Larissa_Preedy » IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #7 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 4:01am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

Is it alowed to use ^(1/2) (to the power 1/2) instead of sqrt? (Even though it's the same thing)
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Larissa_Preedy
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 14
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #8 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 6:48am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

omg, i'm such a fruitcake
 
i think i can do that..i'll try now
IP Logged
Larissa_Preedy
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 14
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #9 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 6:55am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

yeh that worked  Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed
 
so many silly mistakes i make Sad
IP Logged
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Some people are average, some are just mean.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 13730
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #10 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 9:14am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jun 8th, 2005, 6:55am, Larissa_Preedy wrote:
so many silly mistakes i make Sad
Well, this is the best time to make them, better than during an exam. As long as you learn from them.
If you make every possible mistake now, you'll be able to recognize them when it counts Wink
IP Logged

Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****



Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.

   


Gender: male
Posts: 4863
Re: guitar string  
« Reply #11 on: Jun 8th, 2005, 6:29pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Jun 8th, 2005, 2:56am, towr wrote:
What is meant by "order of magnitude of the expression"?

 
From Larissa's statements, I think what it really means is: determine the formula up to a multiplicative constant.  
 
E.g., E = mv2 would be acceptable answer  instead of the actual formula of E = (1/2)mv2.
 
I think the point of the questions is to show students that much of the information they need is available in the units (and hopefully instill in them the realization that carrying the units through the calculation can be helpful, instead of dropping the units at the start, then appending the expected units on the final answer as is their wont).
 
It is a bit risky determining formula by figuring out how to make the dimensions cancel out correctly. There may be contributors that you miss, or others that you included that should not have been included. (For instance, if their was some time quantity around with this problem, you might have been tempted to multiply your formula by it to get rid of one of the 1/sec factors, instead of taking the square root - thus resulting in an incorrect formula). However, this method does provide a good feel for what the actual formula should look like, which can be helpful in deriving it.
IP Logged

"Pi goes on and on and on ...
And e is just as cursed.
I wonder: Which is larger
When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board