Author |
Topic: Constant Modulo N (Read 1187 times) |
|
william wu
wu::riddles Administrator
Gender:
Posts: 1291
|
|
Constant Modulo N
« on: Aug 23rd, 2003, 9:55pm » |
Quote Modify
|
For any positive integer n, show that the sequence { 2 , 22 , 22[sup2] , ... } eventually becomes a constant modulo n.
|
« Last Edit: Aug 23rd, 2003, 9:57pm by william wu » |
IP Logged |
[ wu ] : http://wuriddles.com / http://forums.wuriddles.com
|
|
|
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae
Gender:
Posts: 1825
|
|
Re: Constant Modulo N
« Reply #1 on: Aug 24th, 2003, 7:18am » |
Quote Modify
|
I don't think this works in general?! Let uk represent the kth term of the sequence. Let us assume that uk [equiv] b mod n for some k. uk+1 = (uk)2 [equiv] b2 mod n. Now consider n=7. u1 = 2 [equiv] 2 mod 7. u2 [equiv] 4 mod 7 u3 [equiv] 2 mod 7, and so on. That is, it will alternate congruence with 2 and 4, never becoming constant. The only way to guarantee this to work, is for b=0 or b=1 for some k. In other words, n=uk or n=uk–1. For example, the actual sequence (when evaluated) is: 2,4,16,256,65536. 2 [equiv] 2 mod 15 4 [equiv] 4 mod 15 16 [equiv] 1 mod 15 256 [equiv] 1 mod 15, and so on. Have I missed something?
|
|
IP Logged |
mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
|
|
|
hv2004
Guest
|
This is USAMO 1991/3. The solution involves mathematics induction and Fermat-Euler theorem. An alternate and more difficult version of this problem is Putnam 1997/B5. This problem is also similar to Putnam 1985/A4.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
wowbagger
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 727
|
|
Re: Constant Modulo N
« Reply #4 on: Aug 24th, 2003, 8:42am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Aug 24th, 2003, 7:18am, Sir Col wrote:Let uk represent the kth term of the sequence. Let us assume that uk [equiv] b mod n for some k. uk+1 = (uk)2 [equiv] b2 mod n. |
| I don't think that's true, because uk+1 = 2uk. So u4 = 65536, u4 = 2 (mod 7). Don't know whether this helps much in finding the constant n. Or am I the one who's wrong?
|
« Last Edit: Aug 24th, 2003, 8:50am by wowbagger » |
IP Logged |
"You're a jerk, <your surname>!"
|
|
|
Sir Col
Uberpuzzler
impudens simia et macrologus profundus fabulae
Gender:
Posts: 1825
|
|
Re: Constant Modulo N
« Reply #5 on: Aug 24th, 2003, 8:54am » |
Quote Modify
|
Ah, it looked to me as if each new term was being squared. It is not clear from the question if uk+1=uk2 or uk+1=2uk and that would make a difference. As it is taken from a genuine paper, it must have a solution. You must be right, wowbagger. Cheers! Hmm. Back to pencil and paper...
|
« Last Edit: Aug 24th, 2003, 9:01am by Sir Col » |
IP Logged |
mathschallenge.net / projecteuler.net
|
|
|
DH
Guest
|
Suppose this holds true for all numbers smaller than n. The sequence 21 mod n , 22 mod n , 23 mod n ... either converges to 0 or it is periodic and the period is T < n.The period cannot be n because all numbers including 0 would have to be part of the sequence. u(k) = 2u(k-1) u(k) mod n = 2u(k-1) mod n = 2( u(k-1) mod T ) mod n Because T<n we already know that u(k-1) mod T will eventually converge. So u(k) will eventually converge. To complete the induction it's easy to verify that the property holds true for n=1.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|