Author |
Topic: Is p->q->q a tautology? (Read 2859 times) |
|
techno
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Is p->q->q a tautology?
« on: Sep 26th, 2012, 4:36pm » |
Quote Modify
|
note that there are no parenthesis. Thanks for the help
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Noke Lieu
Uberpuzzler
pen... paper... let's go! (and bit of plastic)
Gender:
Posts: 1884
|
Depends on what you mean... Not in this case.
|
|
IP Logged |
a shade of wit and the art of farce.
|
|
|
techno
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?
« Reply #2 on: Sep 26th, 2012, 9:03pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I think that's exactly what I meant. Thanks. But how would you solve it? What I did was this. p->q->q -p || (q->q) -p || (-q||q) -p || (T) T. Can you please explain me where I did something wrong? thanks for the help. Or is it like this? I think this makes more sense but still. p->q->q (-p || q)->q -(-p || q) || q (p && q) || q (p || q) && (q || q) q && (p || q) Thanks for replying so quickly.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
techno
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?
« Reply #3 on: Sep 26th, 2012, 9:06pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Actually I was wrong on the last thing I did. It's (p && -q) || q (q || p) && (-q || q) ( q || p ) && T ( q || p )
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
peoplepower
Junior Member
Posts: 63
|
|
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?
« Reply #4 on: Sep 27th, 2012, 5:18am » |
Quote Modify
|
A self-implication is a tautology, so implying a self-implication is still a tautology. I have personally seen implication as a right-associative operation exclusively, where we have in general p->(q->r) <=> ~pV(~qVr) <=> ~(p&q)Vr <=> (p&q)->r.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
techno
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
|
Re: Is p->q->q a tautology?
« Reply #5 on: Sep 27th, 2012, 8:56am » |
Quote Modify
|
That was my main concern. So it is a right associative operation. Thanks for the help appreciate it
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|