Author |
Topic: stacking bricks curve (Read 3469 times) |
|
Noke Lieu
Uberpuzzler
pen... paper... let's go! (and bit of plastic)
Gender: 
Posts: 1884
|
 |
stacking bricks curve
« on: Feb 1st, 2012, 8:45pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
So, reading through this I got to thinking about making a curve- essentially stacking infinitely thin dominos- that overhangs in a similar fashion.
Assuming I cut that curve out perfectly, will it stand up, or will it topple? Where's the structure's centre of gravity?
|
|
 IP Logged |
a shade of wit and the art of farce.
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: stacking bricks curve
« Reply #1 on: Feb 1st, 2012, 10:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I think that stacking infinitely thin domino's in that way gives you a horizontal line of infinite length, which isn't what you want.
If you take the stack of normal dominoes and cut off the rough edges on the right and add them to the left, then it would obviously stand up (because you shift the center of gravity for the top to the left at each level).
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler
    
Gender:
Posts: 2873
|
|
Re: stacking bricks curve
« Reply #2 on: Feb 2nd, 2012, 7:59am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Feb 1st, 2012, 10:05pm, towr wrote:I think that stacking infinitely thin domino's in that way gives you a horizontal line of infinite length, which isn't what you want.
If you take the stack of normal dominoes and cut off the rough edges on the right and add them to the left, then it would obviously stand up (because you shift the center of gravity for the top to the left at each level). |
|
...unless you cause the left edge to become unstable.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: stacking bricks curve
« Reply #3 on: Feb 2nd, 2012, 8:46am » |
Quote Modify
|
How would it become unstable? You're removing mass from the side that would tip and add it to the side the prevents tipping, so it should become more stable if anything.
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
rmsgrey
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 2873
|
|
Re: stacking bricks curve
« Reply #4 on: Feb 3rd, 2012, 9:00am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Feb 2nd, 2012, 8:46am, towr wrote:| How would it become unstable? You're removing mass from the side that would tip and add it to the side the prevents tipping, so it should become more stable if anything. |
|
It depends which of the various structures you're looking at - many of them are symmetrical (which makes a certain amount of sense - to provide the maximum moment from the counter-balance, you want to have it as far to the left as possible)
And whole-structure topple isn't the only failure mode - there's also the problem when a brick acts as a lever, lifting at one end so the other end can fall.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
I don't think I quite understand what sort of objection you're trying to make.
In the attached image how would B not necessarily be more stable than A?
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: stacking bricks curve
« Reply #6 on: Feb 6th, 2012, 1:52am » |
Quote Modify
|
Maybe rmsgrey was refering to the multi-layer structures (fig. 4 to 6).
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
SWF
Uberpuzzler
Posts: 879
|
|
Re: stacking bricks curve
« Reply #7 on: Feb 7th, 2012, 7:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Using a coordinate system with y pointing downward and x toward the right. The equation of the left side of this shape should be:
x=w/2*ln(b*y)-w/2
and right side oft he shape is the curve:
x=w/2*ln(b*y)+w/2
The shape runs from y=0 to infinity, and w and b are postive constants that can be used to scale the dimensions of the shape.
No matter where you cut this shape with a plane y=Y, the centroid of the area between y=0 to Y lies at x=w/2*ln(b*y)-w/2, which results in no moment for it to tip over the edge of the portion from y=Y to infinity. This can be verified by doing the integral.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
RIDDLES SITE
WRITE MATH!
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print