wu :: forums
« wu :: forums - outer measure »

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 24th, 2024, 8:50pm

RIDDLES SITE WRITE MATH! Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
   wu :: forums
   riddles
   medium
(Moderators: towr, SMQ, Eigenray, Icarus, ThudnBlunder, Grimbal, william wu)
   outer measure
« Previous topic | Next topic »
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print
   Author  Topic: outer measure  (Read 2955 times)
MonicaMath
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 43
outer measure  
« on: Sep 27th, 2009, 9:38pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

is there an example for a disjoint sequense of sets {A_k} that  satisfies  the countably subadditive (strictly < ) property of outer measure ??
 
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: outer measure  
« Reply #1 on: Sep 28th, 2009, 12:26am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

A simple example is to take any set with more than one element, and define the outer measure of any non-empty set to be 1.
 
If you mean an example for the Lebesgue outer measure, consider a Vitali set V.  All translations of V have the same outer measure c, so countable subadditivity implies c > 0.  But the sum is then infinite, giving strict inequality, no matter the actual value of c (which depends on the choice of V).
IP Logged
MonicaMath
Newbie
*





   


Gender: female
Posts: 43
Re: outer measure  
« Reply #2 on: Sep 28th, 2009, 11:31pm »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

OK, thank you.
But I'm wondering .... does the Vitali set has measure 1 ?? and if so does this contradicts that it is a subset of [0,1] which has measure 1 also?
 
thank you
IP Logged
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator
Uberpuzzler
*****






   


Gender: male
Posts: 1948
Re: outer measure  
« Reply #3 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 4:01am »
Quote Quote Modify Modify

on Sep 28th, 2009, 11:31pm, MonicaMath wrote:
OK, thank you.
But I'm wondering .... does the Vitali set has measure 1

The Vitali set V is not measurable.  The union of countably many disjoint translates of V has positive, finite measure, so there is no way for countable additivity to hold.  But V is outer measurable.  It has positive outer measure, which demonstrates strict subadditivity.
 
The actual outer measure of V depends on V, but it can be any number in (0,1].  See this post.
 
Quote:
and if so does this contradicts that it is a subset of [0,1] which has measure 1 also?

I don't know what you mean.  There are many subsets of [0,1] which have measure 1, for example [0,1] with countably many points removed.  More generally one can remove any set of measure 0, like the Cantor set.
IP Logged
Pages: 1  Reply Reply Notify of replies Notify of replies Send Topic Send Topic Print Print

« Previous topic | Next topic »

Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.4!
Forum software copyright © 2000-2004 Yet another Bulletin Board