Author |
Topic: Towers of 2's modulo n (Read 574 times) |
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
Towers of 2's modulo n
« on: Feb 5th, 2008, 8:45am » |
Quote Modify
|
For n > 2 show that 2^(2)^(2)...(2) } n = 2^(2)^(2)...(2) } n-1 mod n
|
|
IP Logged |
Regards, Michael Dagg
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: Towers of 2's modulo n
« Reply #2 on: Feb 5th, 2008, 2:33pm » |
Quote Modify
|
And a bit more difficult: E(n+1) E(n) mod pn, where E(1) = 2; E(n+1) = 2E(n); and pn is the n-th prime. Thus 2 | 4 - 2 3 | 16 - 4 5 | 65536 - 16 7 | 265536 - 65536 [The smallest prime which doesn't divide E(n+1) - E(n) is: 3, 5, 11, 23, 47, 283, 719, 1439, 2879, ...]
|
« Last Edit: Feb 5th, 2008, 2:49pm by Eigenray » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Hippo
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 919
|
|
Re: Towers of 2's modulo n
« Reply #3 on: Feb 5th, 2008, 2:41pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I thing the reasoning would be the same ... we are investigating the speed of convergence of the same "contraction" (only starting point and allowed length differs).
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: Towers of 2's modulo n
« Reply #4 on: Feb 5th, 2008, 2:52pm » |
Quote Modify
|
But there's a complication due to the fact that k pn+1 does not imply that (k) pn.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Hippo
Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 919
|
|
Re: Towers of 2's modulo n
« Reply #5 on: Feb 6th, 2008, 1:02am » |
Quote Modify
|
Yes, it cannot be simple induction. ... I would study the sequence p_k and phi^{(k)}(n) independently ...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|