Author |
Topic: 3 Right Triangles (Read 748 times) |
|
Michael Dagg
Senior Riddler
Gender:
Posts: 500
|
|
3 Right Triangles
« on: Jan 22nd, 2008, 12:31pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Up to congruence, show that there are exactly three right triangles whose side lengths are integers while the area is twice the perimeter.
|
« Last Edit: Jan 22nd, 2008, 12:34pm by Michael Dagg » |
IP Logged |
Regards, Michael Dagg
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #1 on: Jan 22nd, 2008, 1:39pm » |
Quote Modify
|
combining a pythagorean triple a=(v^2+u^2) b=2uv c=(v^2-u^2) (where v > u) with heron's formula area= sqrt(s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)), with s=1/2 (a+b+c) = v^2+uv, then twice the perimeter is 4s, so 4 (v^2+uv) = sqrt( (v^2+uv) (v^2+uv -(v^2-u^2) )(v^2+uv - 2uv)(v^2+uv - (v^2+u^2)) ) 4 (v^2+uv) = +/- uv(u^2 - v^2) 4 (v+u) = +/- u(u^2 - v^2) 4 = +/- u (u-v) v > u > 0, u|4, (u-v)|4 4 = u (v-u) u=1,2,4 v=4/u+u = 5,4,5 So, (u,v) is (1,5) or (2,4) or (4,5) and thus (a,b,c) is (26, 10, 24) or (20, 16, 12) or (41, 40, 9) hmm, wait why aren't they all primitive triples... What'd I mess up this time. Oh well, divide as needed.
|
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2008, 1:46am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #2 on: Jan 22nd, 2008, 7:08pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Primitive pythagorean triples require u and v to be relatively prime, and one of them to be even. This is why the first two results were not primitive. Note, though, that Michael did not restrict to primitive triples. He said that there are only 3 answers even with non-primitives. Note also that multiplying by a constant does not preserve the area = 2*perimeter rule. The three answers you gave are easily verified. Your argument shows that there are no other solutions that can be so expressed in terms of u and v. This includes all other primitive solutions, and a great many non-primitives as well. But some non-primitive triples cannot be expressed this way. For them, your argument needs some minor tweaking.
|
|
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ... And e is just as cursed. I wonder: Which is larger When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #3 on: Jan 23rd, 2008, 1:45am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 22nd, 2008, 7:08pm, Icarus wrote:But some non-primitive triples cannot be expressed this way. For them, your argument needs some minor tweaking. |
| Really? I thought every pythagorean triple (regardless of primitivity, thanks for reminding me) could be expressed as (v2+u2, 2uv, v2-u2) Wasn't that the issue here?
|
|
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Icarus
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Boldly going where even angels fear to tread.
Gender:
Posts: 4863
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #4 on: Jan 23rd, 2008, 6:38pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Perhaps I am misremembering, but I don't think so. The general form for triples is (m(v2+u2) 2muv, m(v2-u2)). In the thread in your link, the formula was only proved for primitive triples.
|
« Last Edit: Jan 23rd, 2008, 6:39pm by Icarus » |
IP Logged |
"Pi goes on and on and on ... And e is just as cursed. I wonder: Which is larger When their digits are reversed? " - Anonymous
|
|
|
Eigenray
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 1948
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #5 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 5:00am » |
Quote Modify
|
In fact 'most' integers are the hypotenuse of a Pythagorean triple, but are not themselves the sum of two squares. The smallest example would be (9,12,15). Suppose we asked more generally: how many right triangles are there whose area is n times its perimeter? By solving this problem in two different ways show that d(8n2)/2 = m|2n 2'(m), where d(n) is the number of divisors of n, and '(n) is the number of distinct odd prime factors of n.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
towr
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Some people are average, some are just mean.
Gender:
Posts: 13730
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #6 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 6:24am » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 23rd, 2008, 6:38pm, Icarus wrote:Perhaps I am misremembering, but I don't think so. The general form for triples is (m(v2+u2) 2muv, m(v2-u2)). |
| So, I should have ended up with 4 = m u (v-u), v>u>0, m>0, gcd(u,v)=1, v-u is odd m=1: u=1: v=5 -> fails, because v-u is even u=2: v=4 -> fails, because v-u is even u=4: v=5 -> (41, 40, 9) m=2: u=1: v=3 -> fails, because v-u is even u=2: v=3 -> 2*(5,12,13) = (10,24,26) m=4: u=1: v=2 -> 4*(3,4,5) = (12,16,20)
|
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2008, 6:25am by towr » |
IP Logged |
Wikipedia, Google, Mathworld, Integer sequence DB
|
|
|
Joe Fendel
Full Member
Posts: 158
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #7 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 2:10pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 22nd, 2008, 12:31pm, Michael_Dagg wrote: It isn't clear to me what "up to congruence" means. Certainly we can't scale the triangle by an integer, k: we'll multiply the perimeter by k but the area by k2. I think these words can be removed from the problem statement.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Grimbal
wu::riddles Moderator Uberpuzzler
Gender:
Posts: 7527
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #8 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 2:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
It covers rotations and reflections.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Joe Fendel
Full Member
Posts: 158
|
|
Re: 3 Right Triangles
« Reply #9 on: Jan 24th, 2008, 2:37pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Jan 24th, 2008, 2:20pm, Grimbal wrote:It covers rotations and reflections. |
| D'oh! Of course - I was confusing "congruence" with "similarity". Back to 10th grade for me...
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|